Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMK Negeri 10 Bandung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (procedural keep) due to lack of any valid AfD rationale, and no reply in 7 days to requests to elaborate on said rationale. Daniel (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SMK Negeri 10 Bandung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i don't want to write a page of smk Negeri 10 Bandung for now Ariandi Lie (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Indonesia. Shellwood (talk) 13:29, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep. The article has been contributed to by other editors, so CSD criterion G7 doesn't apply: the original editor cannot just request deletion. I do not see any underlying fundamental flaw in the notability or sourcing, so I don't see a valid reason for deletion. The article needs cleaned up, but so do a sizable number of other articles. I was very close to just closing this nomination outright as a speedy keep, but I'll allow a chance for the nominator (and other editors) to comment.
    @Ariandi Lie: Is there some other reason the article should be deleted? Bear in mind that if it's deleted, you would not be able to recreate the article in its current state; it would have to be in draft until the concerns identified here are addressed. —C.Fred (talk) 14:00, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the justification to delete is not easy to understand. Further clarification about the reason to delete would be helpful. CT55555(talk) 14:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.