- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Pet Bottle Ningen. SarahStierch (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nonoko Yoshida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks Notability. References fail to establish notability. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. FallingGravity (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I've added one reliable source citation. Bondegezou (talk) 15:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Reaspectfully Disagree Article and subject still do not come close to meeting notablity standards as per WP:MUSBIO. Being mentioned in a local paper does not establish credibility. My favorite pizza shop has a stronger claim than the article subject.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSBIO. The four sources may look adequate at first glance until once examines them more closely. One is a dead link, one does not mention her name, one just lists her name with no additional comment, and one simply mentions her name in passing. This does not constitute the level of in-depth coverage required to demonstrate basic notability. --DAJF (talk) 06:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Pet Bottle Ningen, it will help that article as well. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.