Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakoma Golf Resort
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:49, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nakoma Golf Resort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable golf course. Article is totally referenced on itself and reads like an advertisement. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable as a golf course. The main notability issue seems to be the Frank Lloyd Wright designed clubhouse. The original design was in 1923 for the Nakoma Golf Club/Nakoma Country Club in Madison, Wisconsin, but was built in California in about 2000 and the Nakoma name was reused. Seems to be missing from List of Frank Lloyd Wright works#Posthumous constructions. See also: King Kamehameha Golf Course Clubhouse which focuses on the clubhouse, not the golf course. Confusingly the article is called "Nakoma Golf Resort" but the resort seems to be called "Nakoma Resort". I have added a note about this AfD to Talk:Frank Lloyd Wright. Nigej (talk) 10:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Might be notable, but needs a good stick of dynamite under it first, with a new article written from scratch using proper sources. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.