Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Ann Jackson (architect)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Ann Jackson (architect) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently this article is sourced to Ms. Jackson's linkedin profile and to websites for her companies/projects. Looking for sources, I found a few different versions of a promotional profile [1][2][3], a news article which quotes her as an expert on accessible design[4], two news articles about her winning a competition[5][6] and some other mentions [7][8][9][10], another award[11], and some publications of hers [12][13][14]. I don't think that this is sufficient biographical coverage to warrant an article. Cheers, gnu57 15:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu57 15:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. gnu57 15:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. gnu57 15:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no coverage by reliable sources. WildChild300^Talk 16:32, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO, appears to be a perfectly competent architect but not wikinotable (ie. no wikisignificant awards won, or coverage), i note that article was created by Tara rmitstudent, a WP:SPA, and is/was probably a fan of this architect hence the promotional, cv like nature of the article. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree that reference list is too narrow. Awards and exhibition list is unsourced. Looking at other entries in Category:Victorian_(Australia)_architects, does not appear that this one has enough merit to require an entry. Teraplane (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.