Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Roberts Gillan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of independent notability provided. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Roberts Gillan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

People article is only one paragraph about famous people’s siblings; her “notability” is only derived from family members. I can’t find significant coverage / reliable sources for herself and career. Trillfendi (talk) 15:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You’re gonna be hard pressed to find it, and even if you do, all “notability” still falls on Julia. (And 10 of her “roles” were in Julia’s films and tv appearances for what it’s worth.)Trillfendi (talk) 19:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I couldn't find a review that gave significant consideration to her in a non-family sense. She can't inherit notability so can't qualify that way. She is rather google unfriendly (since her sister blocks out most consideration, but is always mentioned so can't be cut out). Nosebagbear (talk) 21:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.