Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilly Bollekens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lilly Bollekens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that she received any significant coverage in non-database reliable sources. I found one newspaper article where one result is given (as "Mevr. Bollekens"), nothing else. Fram (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No non-database coverage is apparent in the article or in searches. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No reliable sources. Multi7001 (talk) 01:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It can be recreated if sources (probably offline) turn up. As it stands there isn't enough to base an article on. Pawnkingthree (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: For all the reasons outlined above. MaskedSinger (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Belgian Chess Championship. It's not much but I found a full sentence here. It adds the amazing biographic detail that she was from Brussels ;-) Sufficient for a redirect. Should help later on keeping Pawnkingthree's excellent point in mind. Creator makes the same point on the talk page (and I made the same, e.g. in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Nevens). gidonb (talk) 10:20, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please don't redirect. The target article doesn't mention her, and it's better to let people know "we don't have an article on this person" than "she may have something to do with the Belgian Chess Championship, but you won't find out what!". Fram (talk) 08:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't meet GNG. Avilich (talk) 15:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.