Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life in Perpetual Beta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. henrik•talk 21:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Life in Perpetual Beta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film is not the subject of substantial coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. It exists, especially in the bloggosphere, but it fails both WP:BASIC and WP:NFILM by a long way because its coverage does not indicate any significance. JFHJr (㊟) 02:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While before commenting here, I myself performed cleanup to the article... taking the three paragraph stub that was first nominated[1] and turning the stub into a weak start class article[2] per MOS:FILM, I was unable to find sources outside the bloggosphere that spoke about the film in any detail. If reliable sources for such do come forward, I will reconsider. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, absence of reliable sources. Cloudz679 06:03, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.