Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamille McKinney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kamille McKinney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's nothing to be said about her. No significance. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A sad matter, but nothing suggests lasting significance. Just another of many murders this year. Clearly WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. WWGB (talk) 10:10, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment See my comment below. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 16:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Strongly Keep This murder is significant as it had brought international media attention. The UK [1], Germany [2], Canada [3], Australia [4], Italy [5], Brazil [6] France [7], Russia [8], Mexico [9], Poland [10], Indonesia [11], New Zealand [12], India [13], the Czech Republic [14], Belgium [15] and China [16] SpinnerLaserz (talk) If anyone from Alabama could improve this article that will be fantastic. 16:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many of those sites just rehash text from Associated Press or NBC, in order to provide content for the 24-hour news cycle. Per WP:GNG, "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability". WWGB (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The abduction and murder was a sensational event, but not enough is known about the facts to justify an encyclopedic article. And if additional reporting does justify an entry, it ought to be rewritten as an account of the event, not as a biography. An example might be the "Disappearance of Natalee Holloway" which was also nominated for deletion, but later became a featured article. --Dystopos (talk) 18:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as presented, there's nothing beyond common sensational coverage and fails BLP1E. As mentioned, if there is more than transitory coverage reframing the article scope and recreating seems fine. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 14:14, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.