Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Arbault

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Arbault (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails Wikipedia:Notability (academics) and WP:GNG a search for sources only provides Wikipedia mirror copies of this article. Joseywales1961 (talk) 17:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There's a photo of him with Thom, Serre, and Reeb in the Notices of the AMS (August 2000), p. 761 (the same one we have here). MathSciNet lists seven publications from 1943 to 1957 (all single-authored), and Google Scholar lists 5 citations for one of them and 44 for another. That's not enough to form the basis of a verifiable article and it's not enough for academic notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As argued in the !vote above, he doesn't appear to attain wiki-notability as an academic. In addition, the term "Arbault sets" does not appear to be widely used among mathematicians. XOR'easter (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.