Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haseena Malik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; redirected to Maddam Sir per WP:ATD. BD2412 T 01:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Haseena Malik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's just a fanmade article of fictional character Haseena Malik played by actress Gulki Joshi in Maddam SirPri2000 (talk) 10:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The creator didn't made articles or list article for any other important characters like Karishma Singh, Santosh Sharma, Pushpa Singh, Amar Vidrohi and Cheteshwar Chaturvedi played by Yukti Kapoor, Bhavika Sharma, Sonali Naik, Savi Thakur and Priyanshu Singh respectively. The creator made article only for protagonist character.Pri2000 (talk) 11:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Articles for fictional characters are allowed. See Gil Grissom or Byomkesh Bakshi, for example. In this case the article doesn't meet WP:GNG though. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Topic fails WP:GNG due to lack of reliable sources. Retention of content does not appear it would improve the main article. TTN (talk) 15:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Though a fictional character's article is accepted but there's no significant coverage in this case. ManaliJain (talk) 07:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: does not have significant coverage. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Poor sourcing, fails GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.