Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen S. Hopkinson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Glen S. Hopkinson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hopkinson is not a notable painter. The only source in the article is his personal website. A search on google came up with no reliable sources, and nothing coming even close to indicate meeting the notability requirements for artists. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This artist exists and he is marketing his paintings as verified by primary sources he controls. However, he fails our notability guideline for artists. He doesn't even come close. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I found one source, the Herald-Whig http://www.whig.com/story/27993267/wyoming-artist-to-be-featured-speaker-at-untold-nauvoo-stories that has some biographical info. I don't think that suffices to meet WP:GNG, and I see nothing that satifies WP:GNG. Mduvekot (talk) 03:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.