This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like nonsense. If by some bizarre twist of fate it is true then it's unverifiable/non-notable. Xezbeth 16:12, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)