- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep for lack of a rationale. If you'd like to nominate the article again, please discuss it with me (or at WT:AFD before proceeding, so we can make sure you have a sufficient rationale for a debate (and to prevent a speedy close like this one). FWIW, I concur that the article could use some TLC, if one were so inclined - but that's not a deletion thing. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Elise Estrada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DeletionRequestedByUser Tarroyo1 (talk) 08:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Tarroyo1 (talk) 08:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello, Tarroyo1. Could you please include a rationale of why you think this article falls under the deletion policy? Otherwise this nomination will likely be speedily closed — Frankie (talk) 09:59, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - singer seems completely notable (multiple charted singles, nominated for 3 awards, one of which she won), and there was no reason for deletion given by the nominator. The article is a tad messy and needs work, although I think the citations tag at the top of the article seems a bit out-of-date. Lukeno94 (talk) 10:35, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.