Wing

Hi Ting,

A year ago I ran across your webpage describing demosaicing algorithms for raw Bayer output on your webpage at Stanford. I was building a web-based implementation of Bayer demosaicing and mostly based the algorithms on the description on your page. I wanted to reference your Stanford page but it now seems to have disappeared. Have you moved it anywhere?

I did find a pdf copy of your original paper, but I remember you had a webpage for it with better images.

http://vigir.missouri.edu/~gdesouza/Research/ColorCCD/ColorInterpolation.pdf

If you are interested in the site, it is:

http://thedailynathan.com/demosaic

Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejastheory (talk • contribs) 21:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations!--Finalnight (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Exceptional! Congratulations on being elected. Regards, Rudget (logs) 18:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

'Grats, mate. .seVer!Ty^- (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations. Davewild (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Woohoo! Good luck! - Face 19:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 19:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations on your election. Best of luck to you! Eusebeus (talk) 21:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations. Haukur (talk) 22:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you to you all for the congratulations and good wishes. I will do my best not to disappoint your trust.--Wing (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just chiming in to offer my congratulations as well. I'm sure that you'll do very well on the Board! Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC).Reply

Congratulations from me! :) Acalamari 15:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! — E ↗^TCB 02:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

(Another) Congratulations! —paranomia^{happy harry's high club} 21:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just adding that I think you've done a really great job on the board. It's great see the international following Wikipedia has24.107.128.227 (talk) 10:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I noticed on the questions that you said this was a priority. There are some ideas which have been discussed, but don't seem to be gaining much traction. I'll copy a section from my userpage:

• Bugzilla:12796 -- allow us to create a "base" footnote, so that we can use named footnotes in-text. Reduces distracting clutter in the prose significantly. Discussion permalink.
• Bugzilla:7988 -- create a list of primary contributors to a page (preferably by size as well as edits)
• History options -- these are extremely necessary; see our discussion over at Persistent proposals (permalink).

The first one is extremely simple, yet could have enormous effects. All the reference text could be left at the bottom, out of the content text. People could use CTRL-F to jump around to the references.

The next is more complicated, but extremely powerful for increasing transparency and regulating changes. History options need to be updated -- there's a wishlist in that link. I'm particularly interested in sorting edits by contributor and size. If we could sort edits by size, it would make it much easier to discover major changes -- both good and bad. We should also be able to sort User contributions similarly -- see all the articles edited, then pick a particular article and see all the edits, and sort those edits by size. These technology upgrades would increase transparency. In the future, rather than simple edit counts, we might consider total kilobytes edited (both cut and added) as a proxy for how much people contribute (though there is one obvious trouble with that -- when you cut a lot and add in the same edit, it sums to a lower number). Currently PARC researchers over at Wikidashboard has been working on increasing transparency. They may be willing to help us implement these greater changes. Certainly it is possible; the data on kilobytes is there. II | (t - c) 13:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the prompt reply. I'm afraid I'm not much of a programmer, although I'm hoping to learn some. Working on Python at the moment, but perhaps I should be working on PHP. As far as those new programs -- the first of those was already basically programmed by User:Wtmitchell. He said that it basically just needed to be reviewed and plugged in. It would be nice if the developers' communicated to us what they were working, so we could give them feedback on whether it would help us or not. II | (t - c) 01:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you noticed RFCs showing up on your watchlist? I have most of the RFCs watchlisted, but none of them seem to show up on my watchlist. I've opened a discussion on this ([[1]]), but I'm worried it is going to get archived before anyone really notices. Am I the only one experiencing this? RFCs are a key part of the Wikipedia process, and they I don't think they'll work as well if they aren't showing up on watchlists. II 09:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help! :) Rockfang (talk) 02:52, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Wing :) --BlackKnight (talk) 16:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

for this. Seraphim♥ 16:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Wing,
On behalf of Wikivoices, a community podcast based on the English Wikipedia, I would like to invite you (and all the other Board of Trustees candidates) to a round table interview on Skype to be held at 10:00:00 p.m. Friday July 24, 2009 in UTC. The format of this interview will be question-answer style whereby interested members of the community will pose questions to one or all of the candidates involved. If you would like any further information about the process or Skype, please contact Durova or myself on the English Wikipedia. Please be advised that spaces are limited and the sign up page can be found here. We look forward to your attendence at this event. Cheers   «l| Promethean ™|l»  (talk) 05:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, ive already written this in stu's discussion, however, i feel u are more active. Plz, I need help here:

)== HI == Im really really sorry for bother you here, i know u must got a more important business, however i repeatly have been object of abuse of authority in es.wikipedia. They ban me now, saying that im a problematic user, a user i have never talk to. The last ban is because, i created a new article: http://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Latinoam%C3%A9rica_en_la_crisis_actual&action=edit&redlink=1 . An user named Amadis, http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Amad%C3%ADs , deleted saying that i copyvio and totally copy a page from a forum: http://razonyfuerza.mforos.com/549918/8559668-crisis-de-la-economia-mundial/ . However this is the story: I have been collaborating to an article "crisis economica del 2008 - 2009" however, i felt that current latinoamerica's situation didnt fit well in the article. So i passed all the referenced information I PUT ON THAT PAGE and create a new one: Latinoamerica en la crisis actual. I have to say that my article was created in march 2009, that the crisis started in 2008, but they say i copyvio an article created in 2005! That's not true, those forums copied my articles! And i told him, like I explain here: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_Discusi%C3%B3n:Amad%C3%ADs#Disculpa.3F.3F.3F . Not only he didnt answer me, but it made that his friends ban me. I put an anouncement because i thought it must be an error, however they have ban me for being a problematic user. They will tell you a lot of things, because they didnt like me, but i have all the proof, and this is not the first time it happens, I went to en.wikipedia to look for help. This are all the answer for everthng i thought, and the apologies for the mistakes i made mostly because they never answer when i look for help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Griffinofwales/Archive_1#Momoelf This are Griffinowales opinions: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_Discusi%C3%B3n:Griffinofwales.

This stress my a lot. Firstly i really contributes and i can proof it: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Contribuciones/Momoelf This is my page: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_Discusi%C3%B3n:Momoelf#.C2.BFOtra_vez_plagiando.3F All the attacks i have proved it to be false, and the faults of ettiquette i have apologized and recognize i was stupid. Plz, for justice Jhonatan--Momoelf 02:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC) "Reply

Congratulations on winning the election. -->David Shankbone 19:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

• 祝贺您！--思源如宁 (talk) 14:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ting,

in order to unblock the situation of Wikimedia CAT chapter, we have clarified and simplified the proposal at m:Wikimedia CAT.

We would highly appreciate that you could take a look at it and kindly give us your opinion at Survey. If you consider so, you can also express your support.

Thanks in advance. --CàlculIntegral (talk) 07:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_field

copyright violation, atack people and businesses ..please help, the creator of the page uses harassment tactics and atack scientists for already 4 years now.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.233.93.182 (talk) 09:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mr.Chen:

Congratulations on your reappointment as Chair of the Wikimedia Board! I am 阿pp(enwiki and zhwiki) and I am currently an employee of NetEase Inc.. I would like to invite you to create an account on our micro-blogging website 网易微博 to communicate with Chinese netizens. If you are interested in this matter DO please reply me via my talkpage on either zhwiki or enwiki.

陈先生：

祝贺您连任维基媒体理事会主席！我是阿pp(英文维基百科、中文维基百科)，目前是网易的雇员。我想邀请您开通网易微博账户，以和中国网民进行交流。如果您对此兴趣，请您在我的讨论页上回复，中英文维基百科均可。

--阿pp (talk) 09:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Someone uses the filter to hide images featuring X. That matches their personal preferences and what they regard as their local cultural norm. Now they visit a different Wikipedia than they usually use, developed by people from a culture where X is cherished: pretty much nobody there would hide images with X. The page they visit has several images featuring X. Should the images be hidden to this visitor without making it very clear to the visitor that this does not correspond to the norms accepted in the culture that created and maintains this Wikipedia? 94.223.181.44 (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

This is a question about implementation. And these implementation details are what the referendum was for: to clarify these details. As the result of the referendum is still in analysis and the implementation would be a work of the staff, I cannot answer your question now, because I simply don't know the answer.--Wing (talk) 06:21, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Wing, did I understand correctly that despite major opposition to the image filter on de.wikipedia you support the implementation for all Wiki projects regardless of majorities opposing the implementation in some of them? Rgds. --Gereon K. (talk) 15:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, this understanding is not correct. I suppose you ask because of an answer I made on foundation-l. In that case the original question was not about my personal preference. What fell short in my answer (I was still on meeting that day) was what Arne and Sue pointed out later, that the board would pursue a solution which can get support from all projects, and that solution is probably quite different from the original prototype design.--Wing (talk) 15:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Wing,
the UK National Archives requested a translation of a Chinese text on two images. Would be great if you could add a translation and the original chinese caption for this and that image. Thanks in advance. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 19:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Epic support and fast reply. Thanks a lot. Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 21:34, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

 RexRowan  Talk  17:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

As there is a Wikipedia article about you, you are cordially invited to contribute a short audio recoding of your spoken voice, so that our readers may know what you sound like and how you pronounce your name. Details of how to do so, and examples, are at Wikipedia:Voice intro project. You can ask for help or clarification on the project talk page, or my talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:06, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

thank you very much for the request. I found the following voice file on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wing_Board_08.ogg --Wing (talk) 09:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I have added that to the article about you. However it would still be good to have the requested recording, as it would be much shorter, and we'd hear you say your name. You could also provide one in German, and in any other language you speak. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

在下长话短说，阁下可以看在下在中文维基页面中的讨论页的申诉。乌拉跨氪管理员滥权封杀在下，在下通过讨论页申诉，他就叫Jimmy Xu禁止我编辑我讨论页，我通过邮件向其他管理员申诉，他就禁止我邮件功能，搞得我现在都没办法和其他维基人联络了，怎么有这样子欺负人的？

无奈之下，在下只有到尚未被封禁的英语维基页面向你控告他的滥权行为，还请阁下还在下公道，该管理员竟然将所有在下申诉渠道全数封杀，还好天无绝人之路，他仅仅是中文维基的管理员，封不了其他维基页面，谢天谢地！--守望者爱孟 (talk) 15:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mr. Chen,

Concerning the article zh:晨光文具 about the pen manufacturer, currently there are two Mainland Chinese reliable sources: the QQ News article and the 163.com news article. I am aware that M&G is one of the major manufacturers of pens in China (the other is Baoke and I am not aware of any others). There is a need to get more info about mainland China on the Chinese Wikipedia and I would like to know what I need to do to secure the article's place on there and have the notability tag removed. I did a Google site search and see a few articles about this company on 163.com's "money" division: https://www.google.com.hk/#newwindow=1&q=%22%E6%99%A8%E5%85%89%E6%96%87%E5%85%B7%22+site:http:%2F%2Fmoney.163.com&safe=strict - Would these be sufficient?

Also, do you believe the existence of M&G's Singaporean operations is evidence that the company is likely to have sufficient reliable sources?

You may be interested in this discussion: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_China#How_to_find_news_articles_on_these_companies.3F

Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alabama map turtle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Yesterday you deleted a new page which was the beginning of a translation of an English page about the company (博枫基础设施合作伙伴) Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. The deletion was based on the perception that the article was advertising. But I wonder if you can help me understand how I can put up a translation of this company's Wiki article so it is not seen as advertising. This is why I hope you will help me: Brookfield is a company on the English Wikipedia and given its global relevance believe the pages belong on the Chinese Wikipedia. I started slow with a stub about Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, but ideally I want to translate the whole page into Chinese and put it on the Wikipedia Chinese project. Please tell me how I can change the writing so the article will better comply with G11. As far as the notability of the company, that is beyond doubt. There are other companies on the English Wikipedia page that I hope to also translate into Chinese in the future. I hope you can help me with that. Thank you so much: Jeremy Harrison (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply