Welcome!

Hello, Tricolours, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 

Khalidkhoso 22:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


License tagging for Image:1909-Stuntz.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:1909-Stuntz.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Sydney Roosters player statistics

edit

Where abouts are you getting all the numbers that you are loading onto List of Sydney Roosters players? Nice work so far. --mdmanser 05:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


The Points, the maches, field goals etc. are listed in the book 'The Enclopedia Of Rugby League Players'.

License tagging for Image:Rosnfld2.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosnfld2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:RASShieldWeb.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:RASShieldWeb.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

'Rorke's Drift' test

edit

The article you wrote, 'Rorke's Drift' test, is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the article.Eli Falk 12:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

edit

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by PocKleanBot (talkcontribs) 02:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

suburbs teams

edit

You have recently created a bunch of articles on rugby teams. They do not meet wikipedias standards. Before making naymore please see Wikipedia:Tutorial and Wikipedia:Manual of Style. They need to read like lists and have something that asserts their notability. --Tainter 02:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


A tag has been placed on Fred Grabber, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 06:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

[[Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg<]]

edit

This image is likely to be deleted because you are mis-using a fair use image. You cannot put fair use images of the team, in articles about players - the people who are concerned about copyright will remove the image if it is overused in discussing topics other than the organisation which owns the logo (in this case, it would be appropriate for the NRL, NSWRL, and Sydney Roosters - but not for "minor" players of those teams / organisations).Garrie 00:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Fitler-56.JPG

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Fitler-56.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Bruce Stewart(rugby league footballer

edit

A tag has been placed on Bruce Stewart(rugby league footballer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 08:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

H. McNamara

edit

A tag has been placed on H. McNamara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --VS talk 10:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Sydney Roosters 2007.jpg

edit

Hello Tricolours, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Sydney Roosters 2007.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Tricolours. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 21:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

More on this

edit

Hi Tricolours, could you fix something for me. The image mentioned above is Fair use, which means it can only be used at the articles given in the rationale. There are only two and the rest have to go, straight away unfortunately. If you could fix up these up by clicking on the image and checking the section "file links" at the page you can track them all down. I will fix a few, do you mind fixing the rest. It is pretty important by all accounts. Cheers ☻ Fred|discussion|contributions 20:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merging 2002 Grand Final article

edit

I've placed a suggested merge tag on the National Rugby League 2002 Grand Final article and am proposing the page link be redirected to National Rugby League season 2002 as the same information is covered there. Florrie 03:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Eastern Suburbs 1972 Season. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Xiaphias 03:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edit Summary & Previews

edit

Please describe your edits with the Edit Summary box. It is located just above the Save button you use. This makes it easier to understand edits when reading the page's History of edits. Also, please use the Show preview button to enable you to combine edits and reduce the number of Saves that you do. This avoids bulking out the edit History with lots of small edits. The Show preview button is located just to the right of the Save button that you use. Thanks. Hu 17:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

See above

edit

There is an important message about image use above marked "more on this". This requires attention, ta. ☻ Fred|discussion|contributions 20:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

L. Abott

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on L. Abott, by Tim Fellows (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because L. Abott fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

duplicate article with L.Abbott (rugby league player)


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting L. Abott, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Rugby league

edit
File:Walther PPK.jpg WikiProject Rugby league
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed you have made some edits relating to rugby league. May I interest you in joining the Rugby league WikiProject, which aims to greatly improve the rugby league articles on Wikipedia. You may wish to seek some help about the WikiProject, if so please ask your question here. If you need help on general Wikipedia place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question. SpecialWindler talk 08:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arthur Katinas

edit

Hey, I'm not sure whether you're still an active user, but this article already exists under Arthur Kitinas, which is the correct spelling of the name. I'm proposing deletion of this article and merging of any content (which isn't much at the moment) to that article, because he's definitely notable enough to stay. Thanks, Damanmundine1 (Talk) 09:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Sorry about that, Kitinas. the other was a spelling mistake. so yes delete it. tricolours (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Eastern Suburbs 1954 Season

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Eastern Suburbs 1954 Season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SmashvilleBONK! 05:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Easts articles

edit

Hi Tricolours - I see you are working on adding Easts players' articles and I wonder if you can add a bit more when you are making up the page to save me, or someone else, having to edit the info in later? It'd be a great help! There are two templates that need to go on the discussion page of each article:

{{WikiProject Rugby league|class=stub|importance=low||needs-infobox=yes}}
{{WP Australia|importance=low|class=stub|nrl=yes}}

Just edit the info as needed.

Also, when you are doing your categories, would you mind using the default sort format? It's quicker than having to type the player name in each time:

{{DEFAULTSORT:Lastname, Firstname}}
[[Category:Australian rugby league players]]
[[Category:Sydney Roosters players]]

There's a format for the Whiticker and Hudson that I copy and paste to save time and I notice you use the same book as a reference so you might find this handy:

==References==
<small>
* {{cite book | last=Whiticker, Alan and Hudson, Glen |title=The Encyclopedia of Rugby League Players |year=2007 
|publisher=''Gary Allen Pty Ltd'' |location=[[Wetherill Park, New South Wales]] |isbn=9781877082931 |pages=609}}</small>

Thanks! Florrieleave a note 03:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

No Problem tricolours (talk) 06:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Roosters Line Up 1934

edit

Don't suppose you can help with NSWRL 1934 Final Wests v Easts ? Needs match report & Roosters team line up -Sticks66 (talk) 10:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Harry Pierce

edit

A tag has been placed on Harry Pierce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyRy5 talk 07:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Well, you have to remember that you cannot just stop when the article is to short, you have to wait when the article is big enough to be worth keeping. Thanks!--RyRy5 talk 17:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Important vote at wiki-project rugby league

edit

Many people have been working hard on getting a new infobox up and running and we would like to have your thoughts on the subject here.  CorleoneSerpicoMontana  07:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs

edit

  Hello Tricolours! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 295 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Robert Laurie (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Corey Stewart - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. John Andrew (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of W Watson for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W Watson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W Watson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 12:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of C. Nash for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article C. Nash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Nash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of L. Abbott for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article L. Abbott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Abbott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of A Allen for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article A Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of L. Brown for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article L. Brown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Brown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of F Denholm for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article F Denholm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F Denholm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of F. Foran for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article F. Foran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F. Foran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of V Kennelly for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article V Kennelly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V Kennelly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of T. Oates for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article T. Oates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. Oates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of H. McNamara for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article H. McNamara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. McNamara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of E. Russell for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article E. Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of G. Payne for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article G. Payne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Payne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of A. Nicholson for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article A. Nicholson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Nicholson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of H Kaufman for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article H Kaufman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H Kaufman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 1972 Grand Final

edit
 

The article 1972 Grand Final has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unneeded unusual disambig.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dicklyon (talk) 10:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply