User talk:TheDJ/Archive 7

Thanks for taking care of the editprotected requests. Detection is now running on some 20 templates, and the last instances of these deprecated parameters will soon be removed. Todays requests were the last ones that had to be done. Debresser (talk) 12:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Remember that it will take a LOT of time before all the pages with this problem are added to the category. This is one of the lowest priority jobs in the mediawiki software if I'm not mistaken. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edit to {{div col}} broke it. Do mind figuring out what went wrong? Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 14:35, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

On it. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Do you have a specific example ? Because it's working in the pages that I checked. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. For some reason nonbreaking spaces, were ending up in the HTML code, which broke the styling. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Are you sure that's fixed? a single curly bracket in that if statement looks odd... Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

/me drinks more coffee. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

For you to fix the report vandal script in the VoA helper tools.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

It does not appear to have worked on my end yet.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

There it goes. It does not appear that the page you are on is redirected to AIV after the script has been used though.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Correct, and it doesn't handle errors or anything either. But i'm going to bed now. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi there DJ, I'm looking to pick your brain. I've constructed a plan for an A-class review in my sandbox, which involves contacting each editor who commented in the recent PRs, GANs and FACs, and asking them to comment in a new PR. I've put up a draft of the message I'll send to each editor and the wording of the PR request in my sandbox, and I'd be grateful if you'd have a look over them.

On a similar theme, I could do with a fresh set of eyes to look over the automated peer review page (here) for the article - it's stating a few errors which I THINK I've dealt with (with the obvious exception of the ToC), but I'm so institutionalised by the code for this article I'd like it if you could go over it and see if I've missed something or if the reviewer is throwing up issues which aren't there.

Many thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 10:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting my Vector.js page. Could you do the same for my monobook.js too? The reason I ask is because I'm having trouble seeing certain tools on a page's edit history and someone suggested that it might be custom CSS or JS pages. If you're interested then take a look at this thread on the village pump page. I thought that none of us had the tools, but it seems that some do, and when I log out and access as an IP, I do too! Thanks again. ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 17:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

  Done —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 17:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks again :o) ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 17:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

What is it like being a wikipedia admin?Accdude92 (talk) (sign) 17:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey DJ, I've recently begun making some changes to a personal copy of Remember the dot's ISO date format unifier script, and have run into an annoyance - please tell me there's some more compact way of writing something like this (and that it can be used in a variable declaration):

if (formattingAmericanStyle) {
    formattingStyle = "MDY"
} else {
    formattingStyle = "DMY"
}

Thanks in advance for any help you might offer! *wishes this were TI-89T BASIC, where all that would be necessary is when(fmt_us_s,"MDY","DMY")→fmtstyle (then proceeds to curse TI-89T BASIC for its 8-character variable name limits and case insensitivity)* 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 19:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

This should work I think.

formattingStyle = (formattingAmericanStyle) ? "MDY" : "DMY";

—TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

All right, I'll give it a try. Care to offer any other suggestions while I'm here? 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 19:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

It's been a while, but I would be grateful if you would either respond to my demonstration of consensus at Template talk:Navbox Musical artist#hCard microformat, or make the requested edit. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 12:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

revisiting —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

I hope it is ok to leave you a message here about popups. When I click revert, it no longer automatically saves the page, it does the same as undo, and has me click save. Is this new, or a variable that needs fixing on my end? Thank you, CTJF83Talk 16:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

File:100 7341.jpg is a picture (of part) of the Cluj-Napoca New City Hall, formerly County Council Hall. As a result I suggest "Cluj-Napoca new City Hall". ES Vic (talk) 07:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Obama_Joker_Poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Borock (talk) 06:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Borock (talk) 06:14, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi - Re: this - I thought the user was asking if it was possible to put an off-WP script directly into an article. Is that really possible? Seems like a huge risk to allow anyone to embed a script into any page where the script is hosted off-WP at a potentially malicious website. Either way, thanks.  7  23:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Since you are one of the template's primary contributors, please see my discussion when you can, thanks. Gary King (talk) 06:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I recently suggested a name for an the image File:P1010049.JPG, which I leared was for the Municipal Building in Champaign, Illinois. Upon your renaming of this file, the former name suddenly applied to that of a church in Berlin, Germany. Needless to say, I added the renamed image and got rid of the redirect. This incident has made me wonder how many other images share the same random, numeric, and cryptic names. In any case, keep up the good work. ----DanTD (talk) 14:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

It is something I try to check, but sometimes I forget about it. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 17:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

If you're curious, this was caused by an image on Commons having the same name as the image here. There should be a bot that tags these conflicting images... 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 19:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

There should, or there is, but you don't know what it's called ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

I could swear there is, but damned if I know what its name is... =/ 「ダイノガイ千？！」^{? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000} 20:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'll tell you this; I vaguley remember that at some point I had attempted to upload File:Unionstation2.jpg into the commons, when I got a warning that there was already another file with the same name, and there is. Naturally, I backed off on the upload, but I'm now considering tagging the commons file for renaming. ----DanTD (talk) 13:56, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision history of File:Fry's Electronics in Renton, Washington.jpg This is acutally of Downers Grove, IL not Renton Washington. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.228.99.223 (talk) 03:17, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

I'd log in as myself but I long since lost the password and I registered before I had email. I am the original author of the photo. The location is incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.228.99.223 (talk) 03:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

  Done corrected —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Television program has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 16:54, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for sorting that out. Most appreciated. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

The "move" dialogue suggests that if the target pages exist, but are empty, then the move will work.

Also, I have done other moves in the past on to redirect pages, and they have worked.

Are you able to tell me what was different about this situation that required you to delete the pages before the move would work?

Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

The pages also can only have 1 edit in their history if I remember correctly. I think when you blanked the redirect, you made it impossible to move another page over it. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmmmm. Self inflicted confusion! Could I also ask you to move Steven Baker (disambiguation) to Steven Baker please? (i.e. Steven with a "v" rather than "ph" on this occasion.) Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Per your addition on the Teena Brandon Discussion page...:

"{{editprotect}}

  Not done due to lack of consensus —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Please don't repeatedly make deployment requests for edits, when there is clearly more time required to prepare or discuss such an edit..."

Gotcha, and understood.

How about now? "of Ukraine" would be unnecessary, all Plast organizations worldwide use the same emblem. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 03:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Does hotcat works with IE8? How can I confirm this? I think it does. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 01:54, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Re WP:VPT#Auto-complete unclosed bracket redux - did you get an answer about the performance impact? Rd232 ^talk 12:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

The project now has a more defined idea of what we plan to do. Basically, we're calling for individual proposals on how to improve Wikipedia. Please help by posting your new ideas! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC) (Cross-posting)

Hi there. I'm afraid I can't locate the image again on flickr and have no idea what the details were. Is a very old image. You are the second user to come to ask me, though unfortunately I can't remember who the first was now. Sorry! SGGH ^ping! 18:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I would like your advice on the syntax for {{if pagename}}, since we are now deploying that template among others in the {{cat handler}}. I have written up my question and some examples at Template talk:If pagename#Pattern syntax, if/when you feel like it take a look.

--David Göthberg (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Spitfire^Tally-ho! 11:54, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

The help desk regularly gets questions from users who say they have disabled a special mobile Wikipedia version and don't know how to get it back. The latest is at Wikipedia:Help desk#Mobile version. I don't have a mobile device for testing and don't know how that version works. Is there something to tell them regarding Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 66#Accidentally disabled mobile Wikipedia on iPod Touch or other solutions? Can we tell them that clearing all their cookies will solve it? PrimeHunter (talk) 13:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that will solve it. I have also created Wikipedia:Enable mobile version. If we add the following code to MediaWiki:Common.js mobile code, then we will have a quicker way to re-enable the mobile version.

addOnloadHook( mobileLinkTest );
 
function mobileRmCookie() {
  document.cookie = "stopMobileRedirect=false";
  document.location = mobileSiteLink();
}
 
function mobileLinkTest() {
  var mobileLink = document.getElementById( "mw-mobilelink" )
  if( mobileLink ) addHandler( mobileLink, 'click', mobileRmCookie );
}

You think that will be a good idea ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

The javascript redirect code will later be handled by mobileRedirect.php, but atm, I can't find that in our source repo. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm not qualified to evaluate that code. I got the impression from different places like Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 66#Accidentally disabled mobile Wikipedia on iPod Touch and the lead of Wikipedia:Mobile access that it was difficult to reenable the functionality of the mobile version after permanently disabling it, but I'm unable to test it. Is it really enough to click a link to http://en.m.wikipedia.org/ like at Wikipedia:Enable mobile version? PrimeHunter (talk) 15:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

No, you need that javascript to remove the cookie. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

As a matter of fact. I figured out a trick to do it with just a link. Now visiting Wikipedia:Enable mobile version and following the link will enable the mobile website again. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Great! Apparently it worked for the user at Wikipedia:Help desk#Mobile version. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

I have developed an "Are you sure" page for the mobile server now. Hopefully that will reduce the cases of accidental disabling. The code still needs review and deployment, so likely to take a couple of days, but it is coming. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Contact me in your afternoon about that WSJ comments page. DS (talk) 01:07, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

 Template:Vacation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû 08:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I assume the copyright is held by Wolters Kluwer (a niet-natuurlijk rechtspersoon) and that in that case the copyright would be valid 70 years from date of publication. I could be wrong on that, though. —Ruud 17:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey TheDj, I updated my article Tvtv Services, it would be great if you could comment on the nuetrality. Cheers, --Orangegray (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Quick question: what is the advantage of using {{Start date}} over #time? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, or who has contributed to the article recently, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Featured Article Candidacy with any suggestions you have for article improvements (and being bold and making those changes), whether or not you feel any issues you have previously raised have been dealt with, and, ultimately, if you believe the article meets the Featured Article guidelines. This is the fourth FAC for this article, and it'd be great to have it pass. Many thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for making the edit. Only issue now is that the dab link to Copenhagen global climate summit was left out accidentally. Could you restore the link? Thanks, again. Viriditas (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi DJ, I just saw your response on the village pump to my question last week about citation templates and loading times. That information is very helpful, thank you. SlimVirgin 21:36, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Had I realized you weren't actively following the topic, I would have dropped you a note :D —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:45, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Your baby's learning Navajo > nv:Wikiibíídiiya:Áłah_náʼádleehdi#HotCat. :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 23:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The new code isn't borken. The protected template of Project:Route diagram template comprised of a series of modular templates which transclude the {{BS-overlap}}. We have already prepared the sandboxes for the related templates (unprotected) which are directly transcluded by the articles. But we can not move until the revision of the protected BS-overlap. So please again replace the BS-overlap with the new code. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 13:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Thx. I'm now updating the related templates. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 13:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you help me, I want to create a javascript for my monobook. Can you help me? Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-= 20:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

So? Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-= 02:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Please be more specific. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:42, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Well I wanted to make a javascript that's a tab that will scroll down when pass the cursor over it. Basically it will create a insect page based on Family, Genus, and Species like an "easy start". When you click on Family, it will create the page your currently on with User:Bugboy52.40/sandbox1 (used <pre>), Genus: User:Bugboy52.40/sandbox2, Species: User:Bugboy52.40/sandbox4. Thanks in advance, this tool would make life easier! Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-= 17:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Any ideas? Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-= 16:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

why not just use {{subst:templatename|options}} ? You can also make requests here: Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Requests. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi TheDJ,
File:FrankMorphscapePose2.jpg got renamed to File:Frank Klepacki on an insert photo of his Morphscape album.jpg on Commons. File:FrankMorphscapePose2.jpg is in use only on Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 5, 2007 but I can't change it because I'm no sysop on en.wikipedia. Can you please change it for me?
kind regards --D-Kuru (talk) 16:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

  Done —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:33, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Please use a higher delay. I deleted an image after moving it to Commons, and before my edit for the article to fix the name went trough, I got into an e/c with the bot. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Wouldn't it be better for you to upload the image to Commons, fix the name, and then delete the local version? That way, someone coming across the article while you're in the process of moving the image will never see a broken image. --Carnildo (talk) 01:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 07:13, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from the Junk mail folder. Will look at this later today. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Can tell me what the status is of HotCat, as a userspace-based script? Is an approved script on WP? Are there guidelines for its use? I should explain that I don't have concerns about the script itself, only how it is being used by other editors, and I want to clarify the situation. --Kleinzach 22:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

There are no 'approved' scripts. Basically, anything that is not approved will be removed. Having said that, HotCat is a gadget, and as such featured in the Preferences of users. That does say something about how well accepted it is within the community. And for HotCat and ANY other script the rule is: "... you take full responsibility for any action performed using [script]. You must understand Wikipedia policies and use this tool within these policies, or risk being blocked." —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. --Kleinzach 15:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help, DJ - I've got a horrible feeling that, despite the fact we obviously have a consensus, that Sandy or Karan will use this Tony bloke's unhelpful statements as a reason to fail it again. I swear, if that happens, I'm actually going to go insane. Colds7ream (talk) 15:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Don't fuss about it. It's difficult to get this article featured. Probably one of the most difficult articles around (long, current, dynamic). I have long since concluded that it is almost impossible to get any substantial article to FA status unless you are an FA reviewer with 2 years experience yourself. If this one fails, I suggest you stop trying to get this article FA. Instead focus on bringing more space related articles to GA, and perhaps opening up a discussion on the Village Pump about FA standards. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:31, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

I am not sure what you were trying to do with {{Extra musicsample}}, but experimenting with the live version of the template is not a good idea. The width, etc., that you were changing was tested on various browsers and with {{Infobox song}} and {{Infobox single}}. Is there something wrong with it that you are trying to fix? — John Cardinal (talk) 02:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it wasn't required. The width is set by the File syntax, as is the centering. The template probably predates when those options could simply be passed to the player. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 11:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

See also: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Audio_player_display_weirdness —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 11:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I restored your changes thinking that they improved things even though you said they weren't required. Then I noticed that the audio player was very wide, and displayed starting at the left-offset of the centered image before the player appears. I reverted to the old version, but that didn't change anything: the player is still very wide. (I thought that "Image" vs. "File" might influence the player choice.) Is there some way to fix this? I think the first issue is the width of the player, and if that can be solved then getting it properly centered or adjusting the layout some other way is the next issue. What say you? — John Cardinal (talk) 16:41, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The width of the new player cannot be changed at this point of time. Changing {{extra musicsample}} won't solve that. It only solves the broken centering of the player. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I think the indentation you observed is the problem described in the original VP/T topic. You probably hadn't purged the page, so it was using the old (non-fixed) version of the template. (I'm working under the assumption here that you enabled mwEmbed yourself, but I'm not 100% sure of that). —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) I didn't purge the page; I refreshed an article page in the browser and I've usually observed changes to templates that way, but perhaps I didn't see it. As for mwEmbed, it was not enabled when I did the tests yesterday. I just enabled it. I think I am going to turn it off to avoid seeing the wide player.

Who decided to implement a new player that requires so much width? For audio samples that are required to be low quality and 30 seconds or less, we should have something with few controls, perhaps start/stop only. — John Cardinal (talk) 15:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

This is work by Michael Dale. Video was the first priority here. I think the idea of a special mode for audio only has been proposed already, but it's still under development. Can you give information on which browser you use where you saw the problem ? I'd like to further investigate, because that current HTML styling is awfully broken. I'd like to further track down this issue and get it solved properly. A screenshot of the problem might be useful as well. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I'll gladly upload a screenshot or two, but where? Can I upload to user space? Never came across a need to do this before... — John Cardinal (talk) 00:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

You can use something like http://imagebin.ca —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 00:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

OK. I thought there might be some location on WP. Here are three links to screenshots. Each was made using the "Ticket to Ride" article.

• mwEmbed off, prior to clicking play button So far, so good.
• mwEmbed off, after clicking play button Player extends beyond right-border of {{Infobox song}}.

• This is the new native Firefox 3.5 player. It too has a minimum width that is rather large. The offset to the right is because the width of the new player is set to 140, but it does not listen. The box of 140 is centered (causing the offset), the overflow of width is at the right of the 140px wide and centered box. My change does not affect this problem. The Cortado JAVA player is the only player that listens to the 140px width statement. You can change to it by using the "More.." link under the player. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

• mwEmbed on, prior to clicking play button Player extends beyond right-border of {{Infobox song}}.

• My change was to fix this problem of offset and going beyond the border (NOT to fix the width). —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

The new audio control is too wide. — John Cardinal (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

That cannot be helped at this point in time. It is on the TODO list and I made a request for an audio only mode (Which i suspect Michael was already planning, but now the request is formal). The Firefox player issue is a bug in Firefox that they are aware of. I have reenabled the changes. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:34, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

--Funandtrvl (talk) 16:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi DJ

I'm sorry to have to trouble you about this but I tried to install your QUI script before and I just can't get it to work and have no idea what I'm doing wrong! I've installed the script on my monobook.js file and also at User:5 albert square/Status but it keeps saying my status is unknown and it's not picking up on it? I've tried clearing my browser cache, logging out and back in and still no difference.

Before I give up on it, any ideas what I'm doing wrong?

--5 albert square (talk) 01:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

OK I've managed to get it working now after a lot of fiddling with code. I'm just wondering, is there any way I can get my status to update automatically rather than having to do it manually each time? --5 albert square (talk) 01:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Please see discussion here: User_talk:TheDJ/Archive_5#QUI_timer.3F which answers some of the same issues. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks for that :) --5 albert square (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I created the article Toward the Blues, but there appears to be some errors. Not sure how to deal with it as the ref list and the categories won't show. -Reconsider! 10:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I fixed it. The Reference was not closed. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 11:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Can't believe I missed that. groan. -Reconsider! 11:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

• [File:Plastico.jpg] - PLEASE, RESTORE THIS FILE
• [File:951-core.jpg] - PLEASE, HELP TAG THIS FILE

I hereby assert that I am the owner and holder of (surrender of) Rights of use and exclusive copyright of this cd-copy, scanned by the owner and slight-crop manipulated by me [1] and of [File:951-core.jpg|this image],

both granted to Wikipedia by signature from the object & owner.

I have mailed to the permission-mailbox earlier, as I was instructed to do

I agree to publish that work under whatever source suiting the terms for CD COVER-SCAN RECEIVED BY ME FROM THE VERY AUTHOR OF THE CD ITSELF

He is reachable at: (+972)3-5666901; natmmel(at)bezeqint.net

HE HAD GRANTED ME PERMISSION TO USE ALL IMAGES UPPLOADED WITHIN WIKIPEDIA FOR THE WIKI NEEDS

HELP US FIND THE APPROPRIATE LICENSING, BUT PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THE FILES , WHOSE USE IS FULLY LEGAL

Pleasr refer there and help me better my use of WikiPedia and its Commons.

Thanks 82.166.53.7 (talk) 16:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

(Halleluja?)
Please see and respond if you can. /Orrling 82.166.53.7 (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I note that you disabled the editiedprotected on Template talk:Environment saying that there is nothing that needs doing. I am trying to get the two task forces activated on the the template which is yet to be done. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

{{editprotected}} is not a general attention beacon in places of inactivity. It's function is to attract the attention of an administrator to execute a change that has already been prepared by others. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I was wondering whether you'd seen this as I hadn't noted your reply. The image isn't redlinked, so I gather it's still there. As I say on my talk page, I really don't care that much, but it seems silly to discount an image that was freely given on account of bureaucracy. cheers ... aa:talk 04:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi TheDJ  :-) I don't know if I did something wrong. I'm just going on on a work we started montsh ago. There are a lot of covers of CDs in the category Album covers thata are not understandable by themselves. So I sterted to request the change of those names to have files listed by authors. This has been made by bots, manually I ask just for the "right" (IMO) name. In this way we'll have all the cover of an artist listed under "ARTIST NAME - TITLE OF THE ALBUM". I think this will help in managing all those files. I hope I did not something wrong, if so, please accept my apologies. :-)

P.S. I found that there are a lot of files (Album covers) that are not used in any page. Do we have to keep them? Thanks and have a nice day.

Please, let me know if I can go on with those requests or if I have to stop. --Marco Perticarini (talk) 14:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, it's me again. I don't want to bother, but I think we have a problem: files that I suggested to rename previously of March 2009 have been moved with bots. In the files that you moved I see the "sort key". In example [[Category:Album covers|...ish]] in the file File:Doctor Who - ...ish album cover.jpg. This make all this work completely unuseful because the moving is intended to have finally the file listed under the name of the artist. I mean: that file should be listed under "D" "Doctor Who", contiguous to all the other Doctor Who album cover, not under ".". How can we do? --Marco Perticarini (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

The target image has also been rename-tagged as slightly incorrect. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

The move has been made to create a title of a non-existant entity. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, as it is just the name of a picture of our logo on Wikipedia after all, but the old name was technically the correct one. DiverScout (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Could you please check out the message I posted at Talk:IIPM today? Here's a backstory, if you will. Until a couple of months back, IIPM went to Indian Institute of Planning and Management. One user, wifione, created a disambig page and populated it with other orgs using the name IIPM. Which is fine. But given the guidelines of primary topic for disambig, I think IIPM should link to Indian Institute of Planning and Management and the disambig page should be linked at the top. What do you think? Makrandjoshi (talk) 14:33, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Greetings, DJ. You are advised that File:Royal Robing Room, Palace of Westminster.jpg, which is transcluded in User:TheDJ/Sandbox5, is under Parliamentary copyright and therefore its use outside the mainspace is prohibited under non-free content criterion #9. I therefore suggest that it should be removed from said page.

On another note, I am sorry you had to spend so much time trying to locate the source of the spare curly brackets in Palace of Westminster. I must confess that was aware of the error, which was the result of this edit, but forgot to fix it in the course of the following days due to— What are you doing? DJ, put that knife down! Waltham, The Duke of 14:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Is there any possibility that qui cloud work with the beta Wikipedia?, I've tried it, and it just disappears. Thanks --Koman90, A+ (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I use it under the beta every day. Your bugreport is incomplete btw, you forgot to mention which browser you are using. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi DJ :) I've added a new proposal for discussions here. Do give your suggestions there. Thanks ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 04:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Recently the section links (→ links in talk page edit summaries) have started pointing to incorrect urls. For example, if I view the revision history of village pump via popups, and click the section link of this edit, it goes to this broken url instead of this. Could this be related to the recent edit you made to MediaWiki:Gadget-popups? --Zvn (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, weird hadn't noticed that in testing. Checking. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The problem should be fixed now. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

hi, the images tht are useful for wikipedia (i.e they are not orphan ) have their proper licensing. There are several images uploaded by me during discussion with several co-editors to illustrate things, i didnt added any license to them because they were of temporary use, so feel free to delete all those images of mine tht are not tagged properly because they are use less. الله أكبرMohammad Adil 20:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I didn't quite understand what u've asked me to do, so can i just post the website from where i found the image? otherwise the info about the painter and Year of painting isn't mentioned.

-User:Nirvaan.wikitalk, 9:28, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi TheDJ, just checking if there really was "solid opposition" to your "shortlived" proposal to introduce flagged revisions across the board, as the Signpost article claims. Your proposal makes sense to me, and if the Signpost article misrepresents matters, we should fix it and take that sentence out. Cheers, --JN466 12:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your explanation and for your help with the template. Sometime soon I'll sit down and put the doc together. Best, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure, it's what I do for our common goals. :D —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 02:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

hi thedj - can you reply to my comment in the islam section please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.42.66 (talk) 00:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I think you need to consider adding an opt-out list and notifying users when someone adds them to their list. Someone I am not friends with is now trying to use it to track me onwiki. I don't think that is something we want to be promoting here.--Terrillja _talk 04:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Qui is as efficient as a window with your contributions open at all time. It doesn't know anything more (nor does it really refresh all the time or anything. it only pulls information when the user explicitly chooses "show friends" in the menu). And you can use Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Terrillja/QuiWatchers to see who is using Qui to follow you. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Sure, they could just refresh a window with my contributions and use that to keep track of me, but my comment is that for a tool which is supposedly used to track friends, I think there should be a way to prevent it from tracking you if you aren't friends and it is instead being used to stalk you. The user who added me has added everyone who has raised any sort of issue on their talkpage, not their friends and it is thus being used as a stalking tool, regardless of your intentions. Though I see where you are coming from, I think you are underestimating the potential (or current use) for abuse here. I'm well aware of who is following me, but there is no effective way to prevent them from doing so, which I don't think is right. I think if you had the script add a note to the talkpage of a user when they are added with a link to a page where they can opt out, similar to the blacklist pages, my concerns about privacy would be somewhat alleviated. --Terrillja _talk 13:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

As stated on the Qui page, such behavior is a bad faith usage of the tool, which would make the user eligible for blocking. Warn the user to stop usage, and if not disabled per immediate use, an admin can remove his "QuiFriends" page, block recreation and if needed even block the user himself. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey TheDJ,

Just thought you may want to know, an alternate account deleted my poorly worded and naive invitation on your talk page. Some editors disagreed about these deletions.[2] and also went to ANI about it.

I actually appreciate this deletion because I completely rewrote the template. The template was inviting you here: here. Ikip 04:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for answering my request on the Domino's Pizza Talk page. I've posted a response there -- awaiting your reply again, and I hope we can continue improving the article further. Cheers, NMS Bill (talk) 16:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

You commented on the talk page of the {{documentation}} suggesting we move the /sandbox and /testcases links to the bottom of the template. I have coded up an example, and I think I like it. I'd like your comments on it, see Template talk:Documentation#Documentation/links.

--David Göthberg (talk) 02:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

I've put up some screenshots at imageshackand I've made a web slice enabled page at User:Smallman12q/Main Page Web Slices. Let me know what you think.Smallman12q (talk) 03:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict)

With regards to this file, I think you may have deleted a similar size file revision but the deleted one may be lighter (easier to see). If this is indeed the case, would you be willing to delete the current/darker one and restore the more visible one?--Rockfang (talk) 02:03, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I deleted restored the one file I think you might have been referring to, though in my opinion all versions of this file are rather poor. Clearly taken from a rather old and highly compressed divx file or something. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the assistance.--Rockfang (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I posted this in the village pump, but no one seemed to notice it. So I decided to ask you, since you seem to know your tech stuff.

Special:LongPages seems to have a problem, because it says that "There are no results for this report". I did a bit of research on Help:Special page, and Special:AllMessages, but I'm still not sure what happened to it. Could you explain what happened? and do you think you could fix it? Brambleclawx 22:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Many of that type of Special pages are disabled on the English Wikipedia, due to performance issues. Not sure about the exact situation on this one, but I suspect that is it. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:15, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

What do you mean by performance issues? Thank you, Brambleclawx 22:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Processing all pages of the English Wikipedia at regular times would have the risk of bringing down the website. It is just too big and there are too many edits per minute. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:21, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh ok. I get it now. Thank you! If you ever find out specifically what happened, please tell me. (The page still worked in late November last year). Thanks again! Brambleclawx 22:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

There is more up to date information available here: Wikipedia:Database reports/Long pages. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

This serves a slightly different purpose: Special:LongPages only listed pages in the mainspace. Brambleclawx 22:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I have noticed something: Pages that, as you say, are disabled have this message on them: "Updates for this page are currently disabled. Data here will not presently be refreshed.". Special:LongPages does not. Does that make a difference? Brambleclawx 18:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I notice you removed an "editprotected" template on Template talk:Infobox musical artist which was inserted by another user. I understand why you removed it, but I couldn't see any follow-up message to the other editor explaining what happened. I've left him a message on his talk page. (Actually I left the message intended for him on this talk page first. Oops!) Since removal of content from talk pages is almost never done, and this wasn't a vandalism problem, the user should have been notified. The message was left at User talk:Editor 410. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 14:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

When I replaced the message, I also took out your reply saying it was the wrong message. So I saw your reply. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 14:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in making the edits. --06:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi TheDJ, thank you for renaming my map. Have a nice day. Anotherclown (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I asked a more specific question here: on the Navpop page. Thanks for your time. --SomaticJourney (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Can you please tell me the purpose of this edit? Articles aren't supposed to have links to the user space. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

It's a tracker, to figure you how much an option is used (see Special:WhatLinksHere/User:TheDJ/Tracker1 ). Thanks for pointing it out, I had totally forgotten that I had been working on the Annotated image template. I'll finish the work later today and will remove the tracker. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I would like to translate your tools to Hindi, and therefore request you to please provide me with the necessary terms that I need to translate. Currently I have finished translating Soxreds Edit counter to Hindi and am doing Huggle to Hindi. I have friends who are collaborating for other languages including Marathi, Samskrit and Malayalam. Please do let me know, if it is okay with you.. Regards, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

1. Proposal to Close This RfC
2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Done. Hyacinth (talk) 17:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for writing the tech report! Are you going to mention the new video player? I liked your blog post about it, and hadn't been aware of the new player before reading that.--ragesoss (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Damn, completely forgot about that. When do you want to publish ? I need to eat now, but i can have something around 9 CEST/8 UTC I think. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 17:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Probably within the next few hours. If by 8 UTC you mean 20:00 UTC, then that's fine. Otherwise, I can add something myself (I added a placeholder for it in "In the news" earlier, since it seemed worth mentioning even if there wasn't a full tech report).--ragesoss (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Done, please make changes where you see fit, i haven't been able to re-read everything that much. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

In IE8 (on WinXP), I get the following error:

Message: Expected ')'
Line: 339
Char: 104
Code: 0
URI: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:TheDJ/Gadget-HotCat.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript

It only started today, and looking at the page history, I see that you made a change a bit under 4 hours ago!

Safari 4.0.3 just says "/w/index.php?title=User:TheDJ/Gadget-HotCat.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript:339SyntaxError: Parse error" in the Error Console

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

F, sorry about that, should be better now. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for converting this from BMP to JPG -- I had no idea that I had accidentally uploaded it as a bitmap. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

no problem. You are not the only one, things like that happen. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I just read the long thread at:

• MediaWiki talk:Common.css/Archive 9#Header color in wikitables

I've stumbled into this issue during the last few days, having worked on maybe 20 filmographies attempting to clean-up poor markup and styling.

I think the time has come to sort the issue of non-standard styling in the name of a wikiproject. The whole initiative originating there reeks of article ownership, wikiprojects as "governing" bodies, and impeding site accessibility in the name of meretricious appearance.

I think the appropriate outcome is filmographies either implemented as bog-standard wikitables, or a suite of templates/css that allow central control of the styling (i.e. to site-wide conventions).

The current point of discussion is at:

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers#Filmography

I hope to see you there.

Cheers, Jack Merridew 00:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

• The thread above has rolled well-along and I've a request at WP:AN#Stuck RfC @ WT:ACTOR#Filmography asking that it be reviewed. Cheers, Jack Merridew 03:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

This page Wikipedia:Gadget/proposals hasn't been seen by an admin for months. I posted a request here a month ago, and it didn't get any response till I posted at VPR. You've been commenting there before, so could you please review the entire page? Half the discussions are in limbo over there. Thx. ManishEarth^{Talk • Stalk} 03:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Please check the archives, too. The bot archived some unresolved stuff. ManishEarth^{Talk • Stalk} 09:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

I need new eyes at User:Gadget850/SandboxA. I just can't figure out how to fix this, but I have been looking at it too long. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 03:53, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Weird. It looks like a limit in the references extension. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I've asked Dragons flight— a lot of this is his code. One fracking article left to clear out the daggers and I hit this. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 13:26, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

See User talk:Dragons flight#LDR bug?. Guess this needs to be documented somewhere. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 22:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

As you do alot of moving file name move request, I wanted to ask what are your thoughts about deleting the redirects after all article and talk page / user page links have been corrected to the new name. Do you feel the redirects should stay or should be deleted per CSD R3 if the prior name was something such as an example of file:34547484hfgd.jpg? Thanks in advance Calmer Waters 04:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion, they should stay, to make the history of a file as transparent as possible. However, if the file is from a point that often sees uploads (due to the location being a common camera filename for instance), it is probably better to remove them (considering possible Commons conflicts). —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 09:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good. Thanks again. Calmer Waters 09:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I recieved the following message from you:

"BSIcon uploads Hi, you have a whole set of BSicon uploads and there are all duplicates and files with the wrong file types (bmp uploaded as SVG). What is the purpose there ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 01:49, 12 March 2010 (UTC)"

I made a mess while trying to do some uploading. I would like the BSicons deleted, but I do not know how. If you know how, then go ahead and delete them.

Thanks,

DK Dkpintar (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi DJ,

Canadaolympic989 has similarly orphaned my File:Torbay.JPG by replacing it with File:Torbay NFLD logo.gif. I don't know what is best for the articles. Both my files and Canadaolympic989's files are town seals, but mine are photos of wood carvings of the town seals while Canadaolympic989's are digital images of the town seals. It would be redundant to keep both on the articles, but that necessitates the deletion of the other. Any thoughts?

Neelix (talk) 02:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I've commented at the discussion. Cheers! A.C. Norman (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

They've mentioned your blog post here ManishEarth^{Talk • Stalk} 04:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know ! :D —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Nice blog! I'm subscribing to it!ManishEarth^{Talk • Stalk} 03:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 00:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

no problem ! —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 00:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Dear TheDJ, That's my copyright and I have the full authority as it's in the book of my uncle "From Plassey to Pakistan" By Humayun Mirza. Son of Iskander Mirza / my great uncle. Regards. Humayun Mirza Jr

• sorry don't remember my password* But iDangerMouse is my other username. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.55.221 (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that is not enough. Please read Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials. This gives all the information about donating permissions of copyrighted works. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

It's fine I don't really care about it anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.36.189 (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Did you see the discussion at User talk:TheDJ/HotCat#Shorter_edit_summaries_for_HotCat.3F??

I was wondering whether you could give an indication whether you might be able to implement this. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:28, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I reckoned it would be quite easy, and it was: see User:BrownHairedGirl/Gadget-HotCat.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You can see from the history that I also added another small fix, for something related which had bugged me. Sometimes HotCat's suggestoion box seems to autocomplete category names a little over-enthusiastically: If I wanted "Category:Foo" but there is also "Category:Foo fighters", sometimes it seems to auto-complete by adding the " fighters" even if that's not what I want. It's not a big deal, and I simply type a few extra spaces at the end of the categ I want to stop any further auto-completion: so I enter "Foo   ", and click OK. That works fine, but the edit summary then includes an un-needed note that it has resolved "Category:Foo   " to "Category:Foo". One of my fixes cures this, though not very elegantly; there may be a better way of doing this. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll try to look at it sometime this week, but it doesn't have priority because i'm dealing with some family issues atm, and because I try to focus the little HotCat work I don, on the next version. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 23:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

You're quite right to put your family first, and this is not urgent. Take your time! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:15, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

The file is not protected by copyright protections. Ergo, a FUR is not required. It IS trademarked and the general disclaimer protects such logos from certain uses, but basically not within Wikipedia. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

While removing a category from blocked users I've seen this once or twice now... just wondering if the extra space that is left or the carriage return is causing the problem and if there is anything that can be done to prevent it. Thanks for all your great work.  7  13:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Or perhaps this is a Friendly change to keep from mixing the cats and the users sig...  7  23:37, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems a lot of your upgrades from jpeg to png are being nominated for deletion (by people who are just following the rules without looking any deeper) because they "aren't being used anywhere". While such nominations are technically accurate, they aren't seeing that the files are indeed in use through redirects. While you haven't done anything actually wrong, in the interests of peace between inclusionists and deletionists, it would probably be best to replace the file extension in articles where you make such upgrades. This will make searching for files with "improper" FURs a little easier. Alternatively, you could also tag them with something to categorize them into something that can be excluded from such searches in the future. — BQZip01 — ^talk 06:02, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I have opened bugzilla:23002 for this btw. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

You last edit broke the list styling on {{Cnote2 Begin}}. I did a sandbox to the previous version at {{Cnote2 Begin/sandbox}} and testcases at Template:Cnote2 Begin/testcases. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 22:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

User:IBen/TB mono 21:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for replying to my question. Much appreciated!
DeltaFalcon ^{talk / contribs} 08:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

This warning about the purge is rather disturbing. Some other site could quickly access a very large number of such URLs, creating a very large number of thumbnails. It seems like they could DOS the entire server this way, couldn't they? Wnt (talk) 02:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Debating this with Tim. Thanks for noticing that. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey, could you also fix up Template talk:User committed identity#Disambiguate SHA hash functions? -- intgr [talk] 13:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi there,

on the page MediaWiki:Monobook.js it lists you as a maintainer of the small "icons"
(the protection locks and featured stars)

so that they move when either sitenotice or centralnotice is being used

i have coppied the page (and other pages like common.js & .css), but i can not seam to get it to work on my wiki

could you help?

many thanks, Sghfdhdfghdfgfd (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC) When replying, please reply under User:Sghfdhdfghdfgfd#Small_Icons_Above_Line

Thanks for your work on File:MarinersChurchRepairs.JPG At the time the air was full of dust, it was difficult to get a picture. It is a lot better now File:MarinersChurchTwo.jpg. Thanks again ClemMcGann (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

You are welcome :D —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear TheDJ, We have been use this js for our wiki. We are facing a short issue. "Category" is in bengali "বিষয়শ্রেণী". When we apply remove Category start with bengali content Category(বিষয়শ্রেণী), "catagory "xxx" not found,may be it is in a template" messages comes. And when it content start with english "catagory:" ,its works fine. And also we can add cat nicely. I am trying with below changes,but its not works

var newcatstring = '\n\[\[Category:' + cat_add + (cat_key != null ? cat_key : "") + '\]\]';

change to

var newcatstring = '\n\[\[বিষয়শ্রেণী:' + cat_add + (cat_key != null ? cat_key : "") + '\]\]';

Please help us for that. Thanks in advance.You can find our js Mediawiki:Gadget-HotCat.js

- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 18:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

At the top of the file is "hotcat_cnames=" this is a regexp used to detect Categories. You will need to adapt that. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you DJ.Its working.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 19:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I know there wasn't an overwhelming response to this idea, but there was one person at VPT saying it was a good idea, and no other comments. And I think it's a no-brainer really. Do you think you could finalise your script and propose adding it at Common.js, and then add if no-one oppose? Rd232 ^talk 10:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I initially tried svg, but it did not render well at all. Has svg support improved? Ken. MusicScienceGuy (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't know. Someone who knows more about SVG files will probably have to look into that. That's why I marked them for review. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Ooops - I got it backwards - most system support SVG, which is, I believe, a compact, open format and therefore preferred. Except Wikipedia. I switched to JPG, which has bigger files and does not scale well. Perhaps I should delete these SVG files, but now I note that they render much better. Where would I find out what the plans are for SVG & Wikipedia? MusicScienceGuy (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AWikiProject_Australia&action=historysubmit&diff=357594848&oldid=350192285

and

• http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board&action=edit&section=19

cheers SatuSuro 12:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC) Wow that was quick - thanks SatuSuro 12:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion here. Funandtrvl (talk) 13:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}}) --Funandtrvl (talk) 13:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear TheDJ, I noticed your note to Fabritius on the 'Massimo' family article talk page.

If I may, I would like to ask for your advice, as a far less experienced editor than yourself.

When this page was protected, admin Nick D asked Fabritius and myself to start a discussion regarding the disputed last paragraph of the article. As I indicated in the note I left on Nick D's talk page (see this post), and a subsequent note I left on the 'Massimo' article talk page (see this post), I am happy to lay out the arguments and discuss the differences with Fabritius in a calm, fact-based and non-personal way.

By way of background, while the page was blocked for repeated 'edit warring' over the last paragraph, I would like to point out that I have never actually added any content to the article that wasn't already there for years before I first edited. I have only reversed the new 'vanity' edits by made by 'Fabritius' in Jan 2010 (and subsequently) and added authoritative, original online sources to back up the original paragraph. The paragraph in dispute has remained essentially unchanged since 2006 (see the edit by 'CARAVAGGISTI' on 28/09/06 in this version, para at bottom), until Dec 2009 (see the edit by LeilaniLad on 2/12/09 in this version, para at bottom), apart from 'non-structural' changes (such as a person passing away and being replaced by their heir). Between Sept 2006 and Jan 2010 many editors have altered content on the page, but the paragraph in dispute remained essentially the same. I am not trying to push my own content or views, I am simply trying to revert the article to the state it was in before my first edit, after a sustained and repeated attempt by an editor with a clear conflict of interest (Fabritius has admitted that he is a member of the family and writing about himself - see conflict of interest link below), from changing the article to focus on himself, without providing the source back-up required.

I saw your advice to Fabritius about familiarising himself with and following the dispute resolution process, and trying to achieve consensus. I agree with you and have begun to lay out my arguments in a researched, sourced and referenced way - easy even for someone unfamiliar with the topic to understand - on the 'Massimo' talk page. For example, I have answered Fabritius's key argument - that only he is entitled to the Princely title and the other members of the family are not - with a detailed response, with multiple references and links to an original and universally-recognised source. Fabritius presented his key arguments in the following posts: his request for an edit to the protected page (see this post), and his second request for an edit (see this post). In response, I have replied with a comprehensive answer (see this post for full details of my research) which I believe comprehensively supports my argument.

I am genuinely trying to have a civilised discussion, based on scholarship and facts, but I am not getting a reasonable response on the other side. Instead of Fabritius providing me with his counter arguments and trying to reach a solution, I am the subject of insults - being called a 'liar' (see this post), 'ridiculous' (see this post), and 'biased' (see this post). I am genuinely trying to work according the the Wiki guidelines on dispute resolution, yet I am finding it hard to have a reasoned exchange.

I fear Fabritius's clear conflict of interest (see this post on 'Fabritius's conflict of interest' for details) is making him unable to make clear, concise arguments based on real research and sources/references. Fabritius has been very active since the article was protected, repeatedly trying to appeal to Nick D directly on his talk page to just revert the edit (see these posts), yet since I have posted my detailed response to his questions well over 24hrs ago, he has been silent. As the 'conflict of interest' link above explains, I am a neutral editor, am categorically not a member of the Massimo family (despite Fabritius's strong insinuations) and do not have a conflict of interest. Given Fabritius has a clear conflict of interest, by his own admission, should he be allowed to edit this page at all?

Despite this obvious issue, I would welcome a debate with Fabritius in order to find a solution. I would also particularly welcome comments from other Wikipedia editors on the points I have made and the sources I have used to prove that my reversal of the last paragraph in the article to its original form is correct.

My concern is that 5 days is not enough time for this discussion to take place, and I am convinced that if/as soon as the protection is lifted, Fabritius will simply start reversing the current edit again, having ignored the detailed arguments put forward on the talk page.

I am minded to ask that the protection on the article to be extended back to 'indefinite' (as Nick D originally protected it - see this link), in order to allow enough time for a proper discussion, ideally with Fabritius, but perhaps more importantly with other editors, so that a reasoned consensus may be reached.

I would very much welcome your thoughts and advice on my talk page.

Kind regards, Historybuff1930 (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

@Historybuff: as usual you're clouding and evading the issue. - Fabritius (talk) 12:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Massimo article. I responded to you on the Massimo discussion page. Here follows my answer.

@ TheDj: if the other editor is biased (Historybuff1930) do you think an agreement can be found? And, if nobody else intervenes where does the consensus come from? I already gave the solution, nobody is judging in this dispute. - Fabritius (talk) 11:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Could you please have a look at what I answered to Historybuff and give me an answer? The issue is about authoritative sources and he's always confusing and ducking the issue. If nobody else than the biased editor answers will there be a judge at the end of the 5 days? - Fabritius (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

No, there will be no judge. I don't really want to get into this case, but I can direct you to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)