User talk:TheCatalyst31/Archive 13

Hi-the Padua, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 13:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Wyche, Virginia article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 23:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Gillum, Illinois and the Yuton, Illinois articles nneed info boxes-many thanks-RFD (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Kerrick, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Sabina, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Fletcher, Illinois article needs ab info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Hi-the Red Bluff, South Carolina article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 23:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Estiffanulga, Florida article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

hi-the Tokalon, Arkansas article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

That bundled AfD is clearly contrary to WP:BUNDLE. Not sure how to get a procedural close. The nominator can then do each AfD separately if they choose. Thoughts? Magnolia677 (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm not entirely sure either. Presumably we'd want to get an uninvolved admin (which I'm obviously not) to weigh in, but short of escalating this to a noticeboard, there's not an obvious way to do that. I know a few admins who have been aware of these sorts of mass nominations in the past, but at the rate these nominations are going, reaching out to them might be seen as canvassing. For what it's worth, this wouldn't be the first recent mass nomination of communities to be closed for procedural reasons, but the nominator withdrew in that case; this time, the nominator isn't even the one who bundled the articles, and the article that was originally nominated isn't actually notable so there's no reason to close that. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 15:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pyke, Idaho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyke, Idaho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 03:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beer Bottle Crossing, Idaho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer Bottle Crossing, Idaho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you don't want to be bothered by these notices, just say so and I'll stop. When I omitted them (because the person was supposedly retired) I got nagged at length. Mangoe (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you get a moment have a look at Parks Place, Mississippi. It is unique because it has been marked by GNIS as "historic", which means someone had to scrutinize the entry to be sure it's not only a populated place, but an abandoned populated place. A second source to support the existence of this ghost town was a map showing the place. This AfD seems to suggest that GNIS is completely unreliable as a source. I think I may broadcast this AfD to get a wider input. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Mangoe: Please do keep notifying me - partly because I want to rescue articles like this if I can, partly since I want to pay attention to how these AfDs turn out for future reference. As I mentioned in one of the AfDs, my personal standards for when to create these articles have changed through the years, and I want to make sure they're in line with the community.

@Magnolia677:} I'll take a look at Parks Place. Though I'll want to dig around for sources there, since I've seen cases of the GNIS marking plantations and the like as populated places before. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Hi-the New River, Tennessee article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiloh Church, Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiloh Church, Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 22:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovery, St. Mary's County, Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovery, St. Mary's County, Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 22:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaney Ranch, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaney Ranch, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three V Crossing, North Dakota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three V Crossing, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 18:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabney Estates, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabney Estates, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 20:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midnight Thicket, Delaware is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midnight Thicket, Delaware until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 01:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-Thank You for helping with the unincorporated communities articles and other articles also. I am sad that some of the unincorporated communities articles were deleted for different reasons. I just signed up with the Women In Red project. For the last few years I help with articles involving women who served in public office in the United States. Some examples: Mary Beattie, A. Lucille Matarese, Kelly Timilty, and Arlene Stringer-Cuevas. Thank you for your service and work with Wikipedia-RFD (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you too! I'm also a member of Women in Red, and it's always good to see new members. (I should write more biographies of women - I don't write that many biographies to begin with, so I haven't been doing much for the project lately, but it's good to have an excuse to fix that.) TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 12:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parker Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 00:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate you comments at the AFD. -- Dolotta (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uf. Since you had some involvement with the Uf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 04:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

BYE BYECoal town guy (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Battle Mountain, Nevada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Battle Mountain, Nevada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cxbrx (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Troy, Iowa article needs an infobox-many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and thank you again for your help. I have been trying to add missing properties into NRHP listings by myself, eventually. Here, here, here, here and here. If you are fine with everything, I guess I'll be good enough to keep going without further assistance! Whatever, I'd still like someone else to create the list and template for Redwood National Park, which should include the six entries found within Catégorie:Registre national des lieux historiques dans le parc national de Redwood plus I guess Old Requa and Prairie Creek Fish Hatchery, which I believe are out of the legal boundaries of the park but once again deeply associated with it – just like Backus-Marblemount Ranger Station House No. 1010 and others that you've keeped in National Register of Historic Places listings in North Cascades National Park. Would you mind trying that? Two counties are involved so the situation for Redwood NP is not to be compared with the one of Crater Lake National Park. Thierry Caro (talk) 00:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The new additions look good to me. If you get tired of updating the listing numbers manually, there's a user script that can do it for you after you add the listing. I'll make a list for Redwood when I get the chance. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 01:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Redwood is done. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. Thierry Caro (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crestline, Nevada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crestline, Nevada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

You recently deleted Prince Welf Ernst of Hanover. The page has the following redirects, Welf of Hanover, Prince Welf of Hanover, and Vimalkirti that also need to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:B610:40F8:9318:5ED5:A6C4 (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Done, thanks for reminding me. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 16:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

hallo, I am not sure if u r the right person to ask to or if it is the best thing to do. I started this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#serious_issue_with_another_user and now I would like, if it is appropriate and possible delete it. not because I don't think I am right but because my opponent has called all the people I had a controversy with and now I look like a villein and I fear I will be blocked (boomerang).

just to be 100% honest the same day I started this ANI I lost the grip and insulted and swear to Gleeanon409. I got a warning because of that so I deleted the messages. I am sorry I did it but this is what Gleeanon409 does, he is getting on my nerve to make me react so he can make me kick out of wikipedia.

I know I will never win that discussion as they keep dragging me away from the real and only reason I started it: since my stats proves I am not making disruptive AFD nominations then Gleeanon409 should stop accusing me of that in every discussions we meet. argue the nominated article not the nominator. but, as u can see, Gleeanon409 pinged a lot of people he knew that for one reason or another have a problem with me (when u make delete more than 20 porn bio u have a lot of people who don't like u) so now I am accused of mostly anything and I don't want to defend myself any longer. English is not my mother tongue so to me comunicate precisely and effectively can be hard.

thank you for listening and I will appreciate if u can help. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

With only a quick review of the situation, can't you just withdraw your issue at ANI and walk away? If the stress is really getting to you, then you could avoid the other person (at least for a while) so you can calm down. Perhaps reading Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot might help you. (Talk page stalker) Royalbroil 20:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I left a more detailed comment at AlejandroLeloirRey's talk page, but in short, the discussion has turned to an examination of his behavior, and withdrawing the original issue wouldn't allow him to shut down that discussion. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 20:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Do you have any other information on the Sommerheim park site? Im trying to find more info about points and objects found there and have found no sources from original excavation nor susbsequent investigations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LarsTheFirst (talk • contribs) 18:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi the Caseyville, Mississippi and Norfield, Mississippi aricles need maps-Many thanks-

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Hi-the Kernan, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opportunity Farms, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opportunity Farms, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 20:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Branch, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Branch, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 20:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilda, Benton County, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilda, Benton County, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 20:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Windsor Junction, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windsor Junction, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 21:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cole Camp Junction, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Camp Junction, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 21:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walkers Corner, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walkers Corner, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knob Lick, Estill County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knob Lick, Estill County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clem, West Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clem, West Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the McBrayer, Kentucky and West Hill, Pennsylvania articles need info boxes-many thanks-RFD (talk) 15:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_States/Requested_Articles#Cities_and_towns I saw you made some of these towns and I was wondering if you could help finish them off, thanks Bigmike2346 (talk) 21:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I was planning to finish off more of those when I got the chance. I'm not sure I'll do all of them, since some of the places don't seem to have much of anything left there, but I'll definitely be doing more. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 22:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you don’t mind could you also do the Utah Municipal Courts article Bigmike2346 (talk) 23:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

That one's a little more out of my wheelhouse, since I don't have any particular connection to Utah and don't often write about court systems, so I probably won't be able to do that one. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 23:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you know of any important US attorneys of football coaches that need articles let me know because that’s what I’m good at Bigmike2346 (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rogers, Logan County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogers, Logan County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilltop, Logan County, Kentucky, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilltop, Logan County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

As you may have noticed, I've been trying to go through Kentucky to weed out some of the articles created on communities that aren't really there. I'm looking at this one, and I'm not sure if it's an actual community or not, but it's kinda hard to search for, given the common name. This is an annotated USGS listing from a guy named Rennick who went through Kentucky several decades ago (with Morehead State maybe?) cataloging most of the place names, and that's calling this Needmore (county code is 21031) as a locale, unless I got my lines mixed up. His directory for Butler County doesn't mention a Needmore. A newspapers.com search just brings up passing mentions for this one that I found, but there's quite a bit of noise for Needmore, Boyle County, Kentucky, which is definitely notable, I'd say. I don't want to nominate this one for deletion if there was something real here. Do you have any information I didn't come across? Hog Farm _Bacon 16:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The context behind the Needmores is that another user asked me to create them several years ago. There are actually five places named Needmore, Kentucky (plus one renamed place), but a third user wrote articles on the other ones. From my own research, it looks like the ones in Ballard, Boyle, and Caldwell counties (and the renamed place) are definitely notable, and I was at least able to find evidence of people who lived in Owen, but I found close to nothing about the Needmore in Butler County. I have no objections to deleting it. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 18:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for responding. I'd already gone through Ballard and Caldwell counties and determined those Needmores are notable and the Boyle is definitely notable. The Owen County one is probably fine, too. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Needmore, Butler County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Needmore, Butler County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirtley, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirtley, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Caroline Mark Home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:GEOFEAT, article lacks significant in depth coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~RAM (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Mark Home is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Mark Home until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~RAM (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilltop, Grayson County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilltop, Grayson County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi-the Iselin, Pennsylvania article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moutardier, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moutardier, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 03:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you've been adding {{commonscat}} to NRHP articles, which I appreciate. Per the advice at Template:Commons category, a few comments:

• If the infobox is longer than the article text, or there isn't already an external links section, {{commonscat-inline}} under an external links heading is best. This helps avoid it being lost under a long infobox or causing whitespace in the references. New York Central Railroad Passenger and Freight Station is a good example of both of those.
• It is preferable not to hardcode the Commons category name, as the template automatically uses Wikidata to make the link. This prevents the link from breaking in the event the Commons category is renamed.

Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

The first point makes sense; I usually default to not adding a new section if there isn't one, but you're right that the template gets lost more often than not in that case, so I'll start adding one. As for the second point, that's a good idea when everything's in Wikidata, though unfortunately that isn't always the case. (I suppose I could just link the two in that case, of course - I may just be jaded about Wikidata's data quality from all the mistagged Commons categories I've had to unlink.) TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 02:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi - is your script working for you? I know Evad37 recently updated {{NRHP row}} based on some of my suggestions - is that breaking this script for everyone, is there something else, or is the problem just on my end? ɱ (talk) 00:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I just ran it on a couple of lists, and it seems to be working fine for me. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 14:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

How about at National Register of Historic Places listings in Columbus, Ohio, which uses the new wikidata ID parameter? ɱ (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's not just you, I'm seeing the issue there too. It probably is an issue with the new parameter. I'll look into what's going on. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 01:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Ɱ: the problem was the row for Krumm House, which was using Template:NRHP row/sandbox; the regex that the Commons script uses to identify rows doesn't match the sandbox template. I swapped it out for the standard row template, since we probably shouldn't be using the sandbox template in mainspace in the first place. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good catch, was testing out coordinate and mapping options at the time, missed fixing that one somehow. Thanks! ɱ (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply