Seans Potato Business

Welcome back. Glad I could help. :) Enjoy! – ClockworkSoul 20:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see that ClockWorkSoul has been faster than me, so I think that he will help better than me. But if you need help with something else, don't hesitate in contacting me. See you! - eu:Lankide:Theklan

According to one editor, rotten apples are carcinogens. So please do not eat any more of your banana bread. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 06:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It wasn't rotten so much as bruised. Besides, carcinogens build character... Thanks for the warning though :) --Seans Potato Business 19:10, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not post nonsense on the ref desk. Friday (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, okay then... --Seans Potato Business 19:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Sean! Your "barnstar from the blue" made me wonderfully happy; I'll be glowing all day. :) You should be proud of your own contributions, too, an amazing list that's helped me learn a lot of molecular biology; we're all lucky that you're here. Looking forward to your next contributions in the MCB-verse, Willow 17:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've replied to your topic on the Village Pump with some information you might find useful. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask them at my Talk page. --Slowking Man 21:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Annnnnnnd I finally got around to replying to the message you left. Terribly sorry about the wait; I've been busy with school lately, and my mind has a bad habit of letting things slip. --Slowking Man 09:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey Sean, the usernames which I trialled at WP:RFCN were Poo Poo Masta (talk · contribs), Poo Poo Gang (talk · contribs), Poo Folk (talk · contribs) and the copy of the RFCN comments can be found here. Can I just be nosey and ask why you want them? hope they help anyway! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 20:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I was just concerned with Jesse that he was going to plough through the list of usernames and take every single one to AIV. Many inactive inappropriate usernames have been created that have never been blocked and never been used, if they were all put to AIV, it would put massive strain on admins where there isn't a real need to. With regards to his Rfa, as you say, its definately not a reason to oppose, in my personal opinion it shows he would look out for the wikipedia community.

As for my edit count, its bad - I'm just addicted to wikipedia! My friends keep reminding me that I've got a degree to pass this year! Can I just say, I really respect you for researching this Rfa to the degree that you have done, many people simply support ot oppose based on other peoples comments without looking at the editors conrtibs - well done! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 22:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

That wording has been expressly left out. Kindly inform yourself fully of the nature of how that new section came into existence. You can start with Wikipedia_talk:User_page/UI_spoofing followed by WT:UP#JOKE. (→Netscott) 22:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also see Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Straw_poll. (→Netscott) 22:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes that cite you've made is a good one particularly as it applies to article space. What the "new message" joke banners is about is practical jokes in user space. (→Netscott) 01:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Funny but your editing seems somewhat out of discord with this userbox:

This user would rather write articles than play wiki-politics.

(→Netscott) 03:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Only recently. I'll get back to it pretty soon. --Seans Potato Business 10:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've added a response to your query on this Science Reference Desk topic. As the original query has already been archived, you might want to look for it there. -- FWIW, Deborahjay 04:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

" All my contributions are signficiant, godamnit! " [I am forgetting how I can automatically sign off my name, and failed! It's been a while since I came to WP]

Thanks. To sign your name you can type four consecutive ~ symbols or click on the squiggily icon at the top of the edit box (the one to the right of the one with red in it). --Seans Potato Business 07:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

According to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(headings), only the first word and proper nouns should begin with a capital letter. Would it be possible to differentiate between names and other proper nouns and non-proper nouns? Perhaps it could check a dictionary and if it's listed as a regular noun, it gets marked for decapitalisation. If a word were entirely capitals, then it would be left as an acronym. --Seans Potato Business 20:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sean, thanks for the suggestion. It's a good idea, but I suspect not quite so easy to determinte what's a proper noun as it might first appear (eg Potter, Cooper, Smith, Archer). Also, what if you had something like an embedded movie name, like "The public debate on 'Mortal Combat'", or an official title, such as "Reaction to the Director General's report"

For what it's worth, my bot already does 'case normalisation' for some common headers, such as 'External links', 'See also', 'Plot summary', 'Track listing' and so on. Hopefully this is enough for the moment. Thanks again, CmdrObot 20:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

You asked on the help desk aboout feelings about anon editing. You may be interested in m:Anonymous users should not be allowed to edit articles, a meta proposal that has been commented on by many users (the majority opposing). Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 19:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mr. Seans,

On [1] you wrote:

"If I have a paragraph consisting of three consecutive sentences backed by the same source, should I put the reference at the end of every sentence? This seems like a good idea, since further editing could lead to the addition of facts not supported by my source but which may appear to be, if the source is cited only on the first or last sentence. I think this should be addressed on the project page."

Unless you knew already, you may be interested to know that that sort of problem is addressed by an alternative style of referencing that has never really made it. It involves having a separate talk page, named e.g. "Talk:Bill Clinton/Facts" where facts stated in the article can be individually referenced with as much or as little "granularity" as is needed. Examples of it can still be found in some dark corners such as here and here, but it is probably frowned up these days.

Yours, Anon. (May 17 2007.)

the updated nucleosome image looks great; thanks for letting me know it was updated! i'll take your advice and leave feedback on the user pages next time... honestly, i felt a little bit of a jerk for telling so many people that their otherwise excellent images had mistakes... anyhow, nice work and thanks for the update! --chodges 06:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mr. Sean,

First of all, I really admire your Wikipedia dedication. I removed G418 as a gene for counter selection in the yeast two-hybrid article. I have some experience with G418, also known as geneticin, from my research as well its "cousin" nourseothricin. Should G418 be listed as a gene that can be used in counter selection screens? First of all, it is not a gene, even though it is written as such in the review. It is a compound that is toxic to fungi. Resistance is conferred by the kanMX cassette that is transformed into the yeast. This is often used to create knockouts of genes. I am not aware of any compound that counter selects for the kanMX cassette or any gene that is counter selectable by G418. The article cited in the review is, judging by the abstract, about selection, rather than counter selection.

However, the other counter selection markers mentioned are valid. URA3 and CAN1 are well known and especially URA3 is quite common. As far as I can gather CYH2 works but is not widely used.

I hope this is useful to you!

Kind Regards

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Halfdanb (talk • contribs)

Hiya - are you sure the IP user's userpage is the correct place for a vandal template? Was it your intention to report the user to WP:AIV? Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 22:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alien language? Doesn't look like vandalism to me - the diff is here [2]. Have a look - the paragraph you reverted the vandalism on (capital letters, random "Dad" at the end) was already there when they made their edit - all they did was (correctly) capitalise a "With", unless I'm much mistaken. Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 22:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

No worries. Interesting name, by the way. Do you actually have a potato business? If so, any chance of a pound of Jersey Royals?  :-) Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 22:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nice one. You may mock with the "9V potato" but I did once buy a girlfriend a potato clock. It was crap, though, and disintegrated about two weeks later. As did our relationship. Well, it was her Christmas present. Anyway, I digress. Happy editing! Giles Bennett ^{(Talk, Contribs)} 23:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sean: Your user name, absent one apostrophe, at any rate, appears to be the name of your business. As this is one of the reasons new user's name choices are blocked on a speedy basis, I am wondering if anyone has ever questioned yours. Perhaps, if there has been something like an RFC on it, you might point me to it. If there hasn't, I 'd be pleased to learn your rationale for keeping it in light of the "spam" guidelines. I'll keep a watch here for anything you can tell me. Thanks Bielle 01:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't actually own a real potato business. It's kind of a joke. I have a website (www.seanspotatobusiness.com) but it's not actually possible to buy anything. My edits are very seldom in any way potato oriented, and when they are, I try to refrain from forcing my skewed POV. I hope this exempts me. --Seans Potato Business 08:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh dear! So I guess that means you won't be interested in buying my collection of photographs of potatoes that bear an uncanny resemblance to rude parts of the human anatomy then -(thank you, Terry Pratchett).? Or the Wayne Newton lookalikes? Oh well. Thanks for the explanation. I will be keeping you on my watchlist, however; you can never yell when a POV-editing attack will manifest itself. :-) Bielle 15:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

To add to your empty awards box - you deserve it. :) Have a great day! Spawn Man (talk) 01:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Awesome! What were you doing, sneaking around my userpage in the first place?? --Seans Potato Business 14:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Trying to steal a potato for a stew of course! I think I saw a link to your page off some blocked guy's user page with the title "Cool user names" or something like that. See you around. :) Cheers, Spawn Man ^{Review Me!} 03:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I came across your plea to fix your image backgrounds - while I believe the background color is dependent on the skin, you can change it in your monobook (at least that's what Google says, no guarantees!):

/* Makes the background of a framed image white instead of gray. */
/* Only visible with transparent images. */
/* See #Framed_image_background_color */
div.thumb div a img {
    background-color:#F8EABA;
}

Note that this will be site-wide: I'm not sure if you can make it only apply on one page, and if so I have no idea how. -Wooty [Woot?] [Spam! Spam! Wonderful spam!] —Preceding comment was added at 12:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're a contender, along with User:Zimbardo Cookie Experiment. Happy holidays -- Raymond Arritt (talk) 20:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've replied on the maths Reference desk.  --Lambiam 20:31, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your recent recommendation on wikipedia subheading format. Sounds fine to me. I think that convention is called downstyle or sumthin. Anyway, cool. Happy New Year Tombadog (talk) 19:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I will change the distortion in the picture, but I just got a new laptop and don't have photoshop on it yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklemon67 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I took the outline of the mouse, and did "Path - break apart", and then deleted the inner path. Then I gave the outside path a dynamic offset, and moved it inwards until the tail was a line. Then I did "object to path" on that, and thickened the path up to the the thickness of the ears. I also did a gradient fill so that you could see the change. Just because I could, I combined the whiskers into a single path, and gave them round ends.

Feel free to put a {{db|obsolete}} tag up once you have downloaded the file. --Slashme (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

That was very kind of you to fix the alphabetization problem; I had also asked in the IRC channel, so I wasn't sure how it got fixed! This is my first time using Wikipedia, so I also wasn't sure how to reply to your message, so I thought it would just be deleted, like e-mail. I appreciate your help, and now I know how to reply to messages as well! Have a nice day/night, and thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Profroush (talk • contribs) 03:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is the conversion of a PNG to an SVG compatible with the fair use rationale which says something about low resolution (arguably doesn't exist in the world of SVG)? I guess it's tricky 'cause the law makers didn't envision the SVG. Although when you look at an SVG at wikipedia, it is of a limited size, this (as it says in the text below the image) is arbitrary since it can be enlarged as many times as person likes. --Seans Potato Business 18:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The "low resolution" criteria does not apply to vector images. Basically, if an image can be vectorized then the image is simple enough that raising or lowering its resolution doesn't have an impact on our claim of fair use. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 19:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your question here: Why the limitation to German native-speaking users? That limitation I do consider as somewhat impolite or at least confusing, pending an explanation. Dorfklatsch 17:15, January 6, 2008

Why would you be interested in the French cultural perception of such forwardness? Because the probability of two Germans, two French people and a mixed German-French team displaying the exact same sensitivity, and the exact same standards as to what constitutes a civil and polite suggestion are exactly the same. If you think otherwise, then you are simply prejudiced against Germans for no good reason, based on a sample of one single person. Dorfklatsch 19:33, January 6, 2008 (I hope my English is good enough to get this point across, though it would be really hilarious if not :D)

I assure you I'm not offended at all, just curious. And German. And the issue of English language skills is indeed very important to myself. If you ever come across a suboptimal mainspace (or even talkspace) contrib of mine, by all means please notify me. I know my English is not the best, but I for one am always eager to learn more, because I love the English language. Dorfklatsch 19:40, January 6, 2008

Yes, thank you. If you're interested in my opinion: Don't overthink it. There are (almost) no general rules pertaining to national/language communication patterns, at least not via hypertext. Just tell 'em, and if they don't like it, then you did at least try your best, in Wikipedia's best interest. Dorfklatsch 19:56, January 6, 2008

The best way to protect your article (for a short time) while you work on it is to put an {{underconstruction}} tag at the top of it. I've done that for you. JohnCD (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that is a problem with {{underconstruction}}. The one you want is {{inuse}}. But in the longer term, read WP:OWN - other people probably will edit the article in due course. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nice user page!

What's the matter with the TOC? If the issue is that it's too large, the best approach of course is to archive or delete a few messages ;) The technical way around it is to add __NOTOC__ at the top of your page, which will remove the TOC altogether. See Help:Magic_words#Table_of_contents. --kingboyk (talk) 23:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's fine here, in Firefox... --kingboyk (talk) 00:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I moved your userboxes into a, well, box. Hope that's what you were wanting. Lara❤Love 03:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

That might well have fixed it. If not, try <br style="clear:both" /> immediately after the boxes. --kingboyk (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Haha, I've gotta say congratulations on your creative, funny potato business. I hope it thrives! Cheers. --72.69.146.41 (talk) 02:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ohh, thanks, but really... I put my trousers on one leg at-a-time, just like everyone else (of course I could put them on both legs at the same time, but I don't. Why? Because I'm a gentleman). ----Seans Potato Business 18:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is your immunology diagram now where you want it to be? Please comment at the Graphic Lab, because the request has been marked "stale". --Slashme (talk) 11:15, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for telling me! :) --BLACKLEMON-67 yay! (talk) 19:55, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Check my reply here.

Or this: Resellers in the Netherlands

Or perhaps just one of these:

• La Yapa, TH. Schaepkensstraat 11 a, 6221 VX Maastricht, 043-3251021
• Estafette, Rechtstraat 48a, 6221 EK Maastricht, 043-3251137

(assuming you are currently in Maastricht) Johan Lont (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please go to user page Chris (クリス • フィッチ). Read the dates. This is a very bad time for him. I think at one time he was doing the simple artwork things himself. You seem to hit a raw nerve without intending to. Additionally the scouting images he brings in come from a committee which frustrates him tremendously. I think he's a good man who is going through a very difficult time. That's about all I know. Please try to be careful around him. Thanks If you have questions, post them here, please. I'll watch the page for a few days. Sagredo^{⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄} 04:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't think that I've any questions that you can answer but I apologise for my disruption and I wont mention it anymore. ----Seans Potato Business 08:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks 168.103.5.237 (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Solumeiras (talk) 12:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks but I prefer my life as an epsilon minus (as an epsilon minus should). ;) ----Seans Potato Business 23:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the apology, that's very big of you. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:JamesClavell Gai-Jin bright.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would you be willing/able to have your bot adjust capitalisation of certain phrases? A common problem that seems to be sweeping Wikipedia at the moment is inappropriate capitlisation of the full-form of phrases that also have frequently-used acronyms. Take for example, suppressor of cytokine signaling proteins (SOCS); people assume that because SOCS is written in capitals, the first letter of each word of the full-form is also written in uppercase. Perhaps you could create a subpage for people to add to a list of suitable phrases for automatic de-capitalisation? I know certain items wouldn't qualify, since they might be likely to occur in capitlised-form in legitimate situations, but there are many cases such as the example above that would be apt. Should I start compiling a list? Thanks, ----Seans Potato Business 01:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sean, that sounds like a good idea. My bot can handle that no problem. I've created a page where you can add phrases. If you could sign each item you add, that would be good. Cheers, CmdrObot (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Cross-polymerization, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Cat ^chi? 18:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I was away for a while, I noticed you asked how I made SVG images on my talk page. Probably you figured this out by now, but basically I used Inkscape, it is a very cool program. Madeleine ✉ ✍ 00:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your comments on my edit, however, please review my edit and change carefully. I did not remove your entry. It is still there. I am also not sure what you mean by your statement that I don't "grasp the gravity of the situation" because all I did was follow Wikipedia guidelines. Specifically, the suggestions regarding the following items taken from Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)

• "Disambiguation pages are not for exploration, but only to help the user navigate to a specific article."
• "If topical categorization of the disambiguation page seems to be needed, please bring this need up for discussion."
• "Disambiguation pages however are non-articles and do not need catgorization other than for maintenance purposes."
• "Separate the articles on disambiguation pages into categories only if the list is long."

I hope these answer your concers. The Gremlin (disambiguation) has only ten (10) items, thus no topical categories are needed on this page. It is easy to glance at all the links. Moreover, your edit adding separate categories put just one item under one topic, two under "corporations", and then lumped everything else under the "entertaiment" topic. This included an automobile and a surface-to-air missile system. Those do not seem like appropriate "entertainment" items and thus your edit did little to help readers find articles from this page. Cheers! CZmarlin (talk) 23:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

yes well. I hope you do not send me a viral infection or a horse, because i will not be one happy chappy.

what country are youfrom. and guantamalu bay does not count. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.172.42 (talk) 04:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Huh? I'm from the UK but living in the Netherlands... you? ----Seans Potato Business 15:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have a question on this talk page. I'd like to know your opinion on this, since you redirected it. Thanks --Kimse (talk) 07:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's only after you pointed it out that I noticed it could be taken the wrong way. I said it in jest, of course, but looking at it from another point of view it could seem offensive to the OP; as if I was disgusted by him/her or their question. Good catch, no problem with the editing there. Humour is often lost in the written word, as every girlfriend I've offended by text message can attest :-) Cheers! Fribbler (talk) 22:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on 14-3-3 delta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sean,

You posted a question to the helpdesk of the Dutch Wikipedia. I have copied this question about Maastricht University (and perhaps Dutch universities in general) to De Kroeg, our equivalant of the Village Pump. You will find several answers at http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:K#Are_universities_government_institutions.3F Bertux (talk) 21:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Heat Shock Factor to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
2. Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 16:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering whether this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CmdrObot/CapsList had been implemented already or whether you were waiting for it to reach a certain size. No-one seems to know that it exists. :( ----Seans Potato Business 21:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sean, yes it is implemented. I think the bot has corrected a few articles with these phrases in it too, although not very many--I simply haven't been doing as much work with the bot of late, and the phrases haven't shown up very much in the articles I've looked at.

Cheers, CmdrObot (talk) 23:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, Pretzels^Talk! 15:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The box to the right is the newly created userbox for all RefDesk regulars. Since you are an RD regular, you are receiving this notice to remind you to put this box on your userpage! (but when you do, don't include the |no. Just say {{WP:RD regulars/box}} ) This adds you to Category:RD regulars, which is a must. So please, add it. Don't worry, no more spam after this - just check WP:RDREG for updates, news, etc. flaminglawyer^c 23:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Seans,

I have found your image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chromatin_Structures.png very useful and I would like to use it in my dissertation on histone modifications.  I have already obtained permission from Zephyris.  Would you give me permission to use you portion of this image.  Please respond to me by email at jeffrey.rosenfeld at gmail.com

Thank You,

Jeffrey Rosenfeld —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.48.119.23 (talk) 18:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey; I've got no problem with http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chromatin_Structures.png being used in your dissertation. ----Seans Potato Business 19:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Sean. Just to let you know that I've tacked on a link to the question you asked about bicycle rims and braking. It turns out at least one company uses tungsten carbide as a tough braking surface on rims, although it is quite harsh on brake blocks. Read a review of them today and thought you might like to know. Regards, Brammers (talk/c) 11:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

In the 4th paragraph of "The Wikipedia Me" on your user page there is a typo; concentrate is spelled concenrate. Just a friendly notice. Thank you. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I want to alert you to: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(footnotes)#New_subsection_for_consecutive_sentences_using_the_same_source

You once commented on the issue here: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2007_April_20#Citing_the_same_source_multiple_times_in_the_same_paragraph

-Verapar (talk) 21:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

On the mSin3 interaction domain page, it says The mSin3 interaction domain (SID) is an interaction domain which is present on several transcriptional repressor proteins including TGFβ (transforming growth factor β) and Mad. That doesn't sound right, and I don't see it on a first pass looking at the references. Did you mean TGIF? --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC).Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JerryThomas01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  An article that you have been involved in editing, DNase footprinting assay, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 11:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Should I be thinking about blocking you for disruption? SpinningSpark 19:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

No, I haven't contravened any rules. What is the basis for this and how do I appeal against it? --Seans Potato Business 22:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The link you provided in this edit led me to believe that the whole thread had been you playing a joke on the ref desk. If I were being unkind and you were a less productive editor I might have called it trolling. If you wish to appeal against an action of mine, you will first have to get me to make it. SpinningSpark 01:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I see. I was using my phone when I made that edit. My PC has been out of action. I'll change the picture. --Seans Potato Business 04:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   Bfpage |leave a message  20:15, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

seanspotatobusiness.com is down and archive.org is not helping me and TomTato's are the best. kthxbai, (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 02:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 10:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Semi protection. Since you had some involvement with the Semi protection redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. KMF (talk) 14:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article PBluescript has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:GNG or having significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 00:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article NlaIII has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of the significant coverage needed to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 19:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello Seans Potato Business! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply