Sda030

Hi there - thanks for your message. Our coverage of CASEL is currently all at the Social-emotional learning article, so, at present, that is the article that someone seeking information on the organization needs to look at. I agree that CASEL itself would merit a standalone article, and I've tagged the redirect appropriately - if anyone would like to work up a full article on the organization, that article can replace the redirect. Tevildo (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, List of educational theorists, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 07:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Buidhe, I had originally moved the list from Outline of education where I felt it was too detailed and unreliable to be placed. I have no personal interest for it. However, I kept it as a separate page to avoid hurting whoever made the list originally. I have later removed names there which are already listed more appropriately at List of educational psychologists or Category:Philosophers of education. So the few who remain are probably "deletable". So perhaps just delete the page?

That said, I think we need to be a bit more careful in switly removing lists from the articlespace based on this criteria, without a proper discussion, as many categories and lists are developed based on the contents of the articles, not from an external reliable list. There are thousands of categories and lists that lack reliable, independent sources, which are nonetheless useful because they point to articles that do contain reliable, independent sources. Sda030 (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Sda030. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of educational theorists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Sda030. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of educational theorists".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Assessment software has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:49, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply