Saurabhgurgaon

Thanks sir for inviting me Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Rathore Plaza Sarsai, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Less Unless (talk) 12:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Smt Vimlesh Rathore Global School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. creffett (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Community Hospital Sarsai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

try to select important topics, not ones of only local interest, and make sure before you begin that there are references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements -- the problem usually is finding sources that are both substantialand independent. DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I selected only website yes or not for references Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 10:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sir please unblock me for editing Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 10:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sir please unblock ip address for publish my ip address in public Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Primary School Sarsai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrClog (talk) 10:39, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey Saurabhgurgaon, welcome to Wikipedia! On your user page, you claimed that you have rollback, new page reviewer and autopatrolled priviliges. However, this is not actually true; therefore, I've removed the claims from your user page. Best, MrClog (talk) 10:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Thakur Shivam Singh. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Thakur Shivam Singh. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. GSS ^💬 06:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why you deletion the article Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 06:52, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Thakur Shivam Singh. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. GSS ^💬 06:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why you delete this page Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 06:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Thakur Shivam Singh. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 07:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article has not been deleted yet, it has been nominated for deletion. If you want to know why, please review the AFD page for the article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thakur Shivam Singh (2nd nomination). Continued removal of the discussion notice on the article, however, will result in a loss of editing privileges. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 07:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I noticed you recently added a template to another editor's userpage implying they were a sockpuppet, and also noticed that you are falsely claiming to be an admin. Note that this conduct is improper and disruptive to the project, and that if you persist (you have been warned about impersonation before) you will face sanction. Best. SamHolt6 (talk) 11:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --SamHolt6 (talk) 03:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarsai Branch Post Office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarsai Branch Post Office until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ².O.^Boxing 10:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

See details in the ANI report. Repeated claims to be an administrator; possible returning editor. Any admin may lift this block if they become convinced you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:54, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why You Block Sir Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 15:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please Unblock Sir Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 15:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Next time I can't do that sir please unblock editing Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 15:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

That's Not My Account Why You Blocked Me Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 13:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ed Johnston Why You Blocked Me Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please see the ANI report already mentioned, and now Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakurjiofficial. EdJohnston (talk) 21:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Only You Block Me Editing In Wikipedia Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 00:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I was only Administration Member show that's my fault on the mistake I was feel sorry why you blocked at one issue Saurabhgurgaon (talk) 00:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply