Santirevecolepe

Welcome to Wikipedia, Santirevecolepe! Thank you for your contibutions. I am Hitcher vs. Candyman.

Here are some articles that you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to develop articles
• How to create you first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Please remember that when you post your messages on talk pages to sign your name by typing four tildes; this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian! Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 00:20, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Chhingkhual Lanu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
Thank you for contributing to Wikipeida by creating articles. I recently reviewed a few articles created by you. In total, you created seven articles. Most of them have no references at all. An article should be created on wikipeida only if the subject of that articles meets the notability guidelines. Here are some guidelines that you should read: general notability criteria, notability guidelines for films, and guidelines for adding sources. If there are any doubts, or questions; please contact me on my talkpage.

For now, I have added notability tag to the articles you created. If these articles arent improved in few days, then either me or somebody else would propose them for deletion for sure.

Also, I suggest you to work on one article properly at a time, and create/move on to another article only after the current article becomes a good one. Thanks again. —usernamekiran(talk) 09:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Cobic Productions Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Igbo Made, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Favang (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. No indication of film notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Santirevecolepe, thanks for creating Lady Like (character)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuff (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuff (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Aurat Ek Paheli, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Lineslarge (talk) 19:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Patriotism (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Erry Vision Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 19:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Erry Vision Films. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. 🖉←} 19:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ranjhay Hath Gandasa, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nerd1a4i (talk) 20:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Abishe. Santirevecolepe, thanks for creating Bat Bitch!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I have just curated your article and thanks for creating this article. I have mentioned some issues regarding the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eng Kan Ti Nge Keini Chhung Hi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eng Kan Ti Nge Keini Chhung Hi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shaded0 (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Eng Kan Ti Nge Keini Chhung Hi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Djakarta - Hongkong - Macao has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Justin French has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Atlantic306. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The WP:BLPPROD notice cannot be removed untill at least one reliable source reference is added. IMDb is not a reliable source. Continued removal of the notice without adding a reliable reference will result in a block. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia policy is that IMDb is an unreliable source because it has user generated content and very poor editorial oversight and regularly has false information added by readers; for example there was recently a hoax actor on wikipedia sourced to a long and completely false imdb entry and false film billings on IMDb. Please do not remove the tag again without adding a reliable source or I will ask for admin intervention. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Di Loh Di is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Di Loh Di until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Film and Drama Youth Organisation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 22:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Film and Drama Youth Organisation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Film and Drama Youth Organisation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You have created multiple article with no references and have received many notices on your talk page about this editing practice, many (if not most) of your articles have maintenance templates regarding this issue. Verifiability is one of the main core content policies of Wikipedia, unsourced content is not allowed. This continued behavior goes against a basic pillar of Wikipedia, known as Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. You need to provide reliable sources with the content you create - unsourced content can be deleted through various deletion processes including speedy deletion and Articles for deletion. If the unsourced content is about a living person, that content can be removed without discussion.
You're obviously an experienced editor, but since this is an ongoing issue, you should seriously consider going through the following before adding any more unsourced articles to Wikipedia:

• Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources
• Wikipedia adventure
• Reliable sources

Shearonink (talk) 15:55, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

And yet more articles with no sources: Pitchi Pullaiah, Suna Panjuri, ‎Chhingkhual Lanu... PLEASE start using references in the articles you create. Shearonink (talk) 14:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabo in Action is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabo in Action until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 11:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anjaam (2008 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjaam (2008 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 20:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darwaza (2002 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwaza (2002 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 01:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chhingkhual Lanu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chhingkhual Lanu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ninja Terminator, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Ninja Terminator.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

• Stop blanking citations and adding unsourced content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article Gee-O-Jatta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NFILM following a search for sources, and literately turn in nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 14:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gee-O-Jatta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gee-O-Jatta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 23:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating El Limpiabotas, Santirevecolepe!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

 

 

 

 

Hello Santirevecolepe: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 03:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

 

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

More References needed to prove the accuracy of the content.

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 03:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating It's Hard to Get a Loving Man, Santirevecolepe!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

==Happy New Year!==

 

 

 

 

 

Santirevecolepe,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Abishe (talk) 02:54, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

---

•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 02:54, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I've worked a bit on the article The Text of Light adding categories and references. Are you interested in improving this article further? -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 11:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Igbo Made, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, can you please add your sources to Ghost Busting? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Djaka Taroeb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Djaka Taroeb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 03:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Strokémon: The XXX Parody has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, with 12 imdb reviews as the only impact noted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 19:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ghost Busting, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Matteela Films. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kalu Shahpuria should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalu Shahpuria .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 03:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Can you please add your sources to Rani Beti Raaj Karegi? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 22:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Teesri Dunia. Boleyn (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Edcolins. The quote from "a user on IMDb named "JRogers4"" that you had inserted in Home Alone da Riber is, in my opinion, clearly violating our policies, and it has been removed. See especially WP:USERGENERATED. If you need guidance regarding what a reliable source is, please see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Edcolins (talk) 20:13, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ingongoni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingongoni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Zawl 10:59, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aizawl Khawpui Traffic Jam Hi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aizawl Khawpui Traffic Jam Hi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Zawl 12:18, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frozen Flesh Cinema is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frozen Flesh Cinema until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Zawl 12:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Entre étude et Amour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing found on this film at all; possible hoax / student film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Super Mouse and the Roborats should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Mouse and the Roborats .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Enwebb (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nomus (film), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains^(talk) 02:17, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Santirevecolepe, Greetings. Pls note that your creation page Billa (2002 film) has been moved to Draft:Billa (2002 film) page. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs inline citation from independent/third party reliable source for verification to gauge nobility criteria is met. What you provide is primary source. Pls see reliable source - WP:RS, verification - WP:V, and notability WP:N. For webcite - see here WP:CITEWEB and its template Template: cite web. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Hitler (1986 film) has been moved to Draft:Hitler (1986 film). Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs inline citation from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

1. reliable source - see WP:RS
2. primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
3. verification - see WP:V
4. notability - see WP:N
5. webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, you could move back the page to "article" to resumit. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Mario Kirby Masterpiece Video, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:34, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Umm... I think you've made a mistake. Santirevecolepe (talk) 19:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

What is the mistake? You are removing sources on the Barefoot Gen article. They can be seen here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

You forgot to put the "Based on", "Starring", "Edited by" and "Language" sections in the infobox film put below in the article. Santirevecolepe (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Didn't forget. You need a source for this content. Please read WP:RS and WP:OR. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

You did. I don't need a source for this content. I have no choice but to undo this edit in this article. Santirevecolepe (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

If you have a source for this information, you need to provide a source. (its a rule on wikipedia. Check WP:RS and WP:OR). Please note, what you are currently doing is violating the rules. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

You can't tell me what to do, Andrzejbanas! Like I said, we have been editing this page since you've been gone to undo some vandalism on other pages. --Santirevecolepe (talk) 13:15, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm not telling you what to do, but you do realize you require reliable sources? It's wiki standards. These aren't my rules, it's the community standards. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Fight Among the Supers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. Searches reveal nothing in the news for english or mandarin name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 05:41, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ang Lo'Waist Gang at si Og sa Mindoro should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ang Lo'Waist Gang at si Og sa Mindoro .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ecstasis (film), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 22:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Khwaja Ki Diwani has been moved to Draft:Khwaja Ki Diwani. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

1. reliable source - see WP:RS
2. primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
3. verification - see WP:V
4. notability - see WP:N
5. webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}} (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:05, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anıt Ticaret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anıt Ticaret until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KingAndGod 19:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Untung Melulu has been moved to Draft:Untung Melulu. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

1. reliable source - see WP:RS
2. primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
3. verification - see WP:V
4. notability - see WP:N
5. citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources
6. citing from internet sourc - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing {{ping|CASSIOPEIA}} (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Super Mario's Fire Brigade should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Mario's Fire Brigade .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:56, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of The Child of Peach has been moved to [[[Draft:The Child of Peach]] as no sources and citations as written to remain published. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

1 reliable source - see WP:RS (Note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR) 2 primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS 3 verification - see WP:V 4 notability - see WP:N

Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the info as per the Template: cite web below 5 citing source - see WP:Citing sources and WP:Tutorial/Citing sources 6 citing from internet source - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Santirevecolepe, Good day. I saw you input some source into the page. Please re-read the above message. The source you added are primary source - from mdb. You need to provided "independent reliable source" such as from newspaper reviews or other reliable their party review of this movie. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 22:15, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Santirevecolepe, thanks for creating Toyo Links!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:32, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:12, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Okay, fine. I'll stop my disruptive editing. Santirevecolepe (talk) 17:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Santirevecolepe, thanks for creating Toshiyuki Kimori!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC):Can you please respond? You are repeatedly creating articles with no references; please see WP:V. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:08, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've sent you several messages but you haven't responded. WP:Communication is required, per the policies WP:CONDUCT and WP:DISPUTE. Please also see WP:V and WP:BURDEN. You have been contacted many times about adding unsourced content to Wikipedia - please stop doing this. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

• Okay, okay, I can respond. I will start creating articles with sourced content and references. Santirevecolepe (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, can you please start by adding your sources to the article mentioned above? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Alright then. :) Santirevecolepe (talk) 21:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

After seven messages sent over several months, you have not added any references to the articles. Please work on them in draftspace and re-submit via WP:AFC when they have references. You have created many articles, but most of them have unreliable sources and several have been tagged for notability. Boleyn (talk) 07:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I did add any references to the articles, for example, Draft:Toyo Links, which I forgot to add references to it. Santirevecolepe (talk) 13:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am glad you are now responding and adding sources to the information you add. Please submit it for the mainspace whenever you feel ready - if you want any further help, the WP:TEAHOUSE is a great support. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:15, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Omni Productions you included material from the Transformers Wiki. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on The Last Air Raid, Kumagaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://nishikataeiga.blogspot.fr/2014/10/the-last-air-raid-kumagaya-1993.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I'll stop making pages that are copyright violations. Santirevecolepe (talk) 23:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I see in the articles Lanny Broyles, Richard Nieskens, and Cliff Harrington you copied material from the Dubbing Wikia. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for these three articles. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, William Ross (actor), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether William Ross (actor) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Ross (actor) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC) Dude, please, I don't want the "William Ross (actor)" page to be deleted. Santirevecolepe (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Nieskens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Nieskens until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lensman (1984 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

• Alright then. I will add content with citing reliable sources. Santirevecolepe (talk) 22:10, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

• So most of the sources do not state what they claimed or were user uploaded content to youtube. Per WP:YOUTUBE, "Many videos hosted on YouTube or similar sites do not meet the standards for inclusion in External links sections, and copyright is of particular concern. Many YouTube videos of newscasts, shows or other content of interest to Wikipedia visitors are copyright violations and should not be linked, either in the article or in citations." Please read through WP:RS to figure out what qualifies as a reliable source on Wikipedia so your content can be used. :) Thanks!Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

• Wait a second... Aren't you Andrzejbanas!? Santirevecolepe (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Andrzejbanas. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

How did you know about that? --Santirevecolepe (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article Dan Lorge has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — IVORK _Discuss 01:46, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Son of Dracula (2009 film), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 10:50, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Son of Dracula (2009 film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son of Dracula (2009 film) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Hzh (talk) 14:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Don Knode requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/heraldtribune/obituary.aspx?n=donald-p-knode&pid=184205105&fhid=8477. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I won't make pages with copyrighted content anymore. Santirevecolepe (talk) 00:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Billa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 13:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untung Melulu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 23:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barefoot Gen (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:24, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

We're not just adding unsourced material! We have been editing this page since you've been gone to undo some vandalism on other pages. You got it? --Santirevecolepe (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

What specifically was undone that shouldn't have been added? From looking at this edit, everything added was unsourced. Which goes against WP:RS and WP:OR. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

What are you talking about?! Everything I put was not unsourced! You're wrong! I'm right! You better believe it or not, okay?! --Santirevecolepe (talk) 15:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Looking at the edits made inbetween (which you can see here), you added (or re-added) a narrator (which we don't do for non-documentary films in the infobox), a film studio (which is not in the source), an editor (no source), a release date (unsourced), excessive plot info (against WP:FILMPLOT). Either you forgot to add your source or...well, i does not really matter. No sources were added. Proof is in the edit history. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Oh yeah, that's right! I forgot to add my source! Santirevecolepe (talk) 22:55, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love Me Vampire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 08:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chan's Films Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 04:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello Santirevecolepe,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yasumasa Koyama for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 03:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toshiyuki Kimori".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 08:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Calicula Machine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:The Child of Peach.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Tetsuya Fujita (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 10:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

No offense, but some IP user saved my article by adding one reliable source. --Santirevecolepe (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hitler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Sound Box (company), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Calicula Machine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 13:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toyo Links".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 21:54, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on H. K. Screen Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KingofGangsters (talk) 17:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Limpiabotas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Limpiabotas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KingofGangsters (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Touch My Body (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KingofGangsters (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article H. K. Screen Art is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. K. Screen Art until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KingofGangsters (talk) 03:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sound Box (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Santirevecolepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sound Box".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Omni Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

No reliable sources, and the text is copied word-for-word from TFWiki.net

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cyberlink420 (talk) 05:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Metastasis (1971 short film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film with no independent, verifiable reviews found during search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:53, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Ni se te ocurra... has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to substantiate notability claims. Tagged for 2 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Relation (1982 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE search to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Mona Lisa (1973 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film. Fails WP:NFILM Tagged since Nov 2017

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Terminator 2: Judgment Day, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, sure, whatever you say. -_-

--Santirevecolepe (talk) 23:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Songs of Sorrow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Well, this is it. I am officially blocked from Wikipedia indefinitely.

It's not just the logged-out editing. Based on Special:Diff/1084309864, this editor seems to understand reliable sources and adding citations. The release date is unsourced, but the rest of it is properly sourced. And then you look at 90% of the other edits, and they're completely unsourced. No idea where any of it is coming from. For example: Special:Diff/1087209612. In Special:Diff/1087956109, a film went from being Chinese to being made in Hong Kong. That sounds innocuous, but it's enough to ignite a major controversy in a more popular article. In Special:Diff/1088064836 and Special:Diff/1088196147, Santirevecolepe edit wars to restore unsourced content. How are people even supposed to know which one, if either, is correct? Instead of being a part of the solution – adding sources to obscure articles – everyone wants to fight over which unsourced content should be in it. If this editor wants to be a part of the solution, then I'd say an unblock is OK. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Suna Panjuri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NFILM sourced only to imdb created by a user with a history of creating articles on non-notable subjects.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:50, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Lucas Learning.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply