User talk:Qxz/Archive 2

FYI, the whole point of the article I am writing is on why we should not fear citing wikipedia. Thus, just to stay in theme I cite wikipedia even when I would generally cite a different source. Writing that objection was the wrong thing for me to do. The reason why some courts have held that facts on wikipedia come from sources whose authority cannot be reasonably question is because of wikipedia's strong notoriety policies. My objection undercut my argument. Good job in removing junk from this site and keep up the good work. – Morscs5 22:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[1] ... there's more there now! And there's always Wikipedia:Articles requested for more than one year ... :) Proto::► 16:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Just FYI: on Feb 12th, User:Byxakissaren changed your level-2 warning to a level-1 warning. I suspect he was being a "fake" vandal (since he vandalized the Wikipedia:Vandalism page) to make a point (perhaps a teacher to a class), but I thought you might like to know about the change he did to your warning. Thomas Dzubin _Talk 17:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I was intending to Redirect, I think I have done so now. I am attempting to complete a merge as per the AfD decision. --Clausewitz01 02:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I had just typed in

• 150.101.23.250 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log)... and when I had it wouldn't let me do to edit conflict. Seems you had just put him in. Nice job ;-) see you around. --Xiahou 02:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the continued help. On many arcticles just after I revert you add {{subst:uw-vandalism1|PageName}} to the user talk page. Good Job! :) RedSkunk 03:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

On The 2007 Wrestling ratings you put WCW Nitro in WCW Dead Asshole – Mason990 04:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Per your comments on the above AfD, I won't fill the page with commentary, but I invoke the double speedy keep re-listed invocation subclause that allows a speedy... OK yea fair point. Cheers ^Khukri 22:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting my user page :) Dmanning 08:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, but we really should come down hard on unreasonable beheaviour. Any reverts or abuse on someone's user page, any use of crude or vulger language, and any disruptive beheavour more than twice (edits, vandalism, and all the above) should be dealt with straight away as these people are not going to change their beheaviour. They will continue to be intolerable, and we should likewise not tolerate them.

Also, see the comments following your own. Worth thinking about.

I did'nt always feel quite this venhement, but enough is enough; I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore. Fergananim 12:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dell. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing How do you do the this edit part? Is it a template? RedSkunk 02:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. RedSkunk 04:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, been busy. ;) --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 01:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Dood, you call adding programming code VANDALISM??!! You gotta be kidding me. First, some jack*** called it un-nessesary and now, it's vandalism. What is this world coming to?

24.16.236.255 04:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that's pretty spectacularly broken. Something's screwy with popups, it seems. Thanks for letting me know about it -- think I'll fix it in the morning. When that many summaries go by and I don't even notice it, it's time to call it a night. Again, THANKS! -- ArglebargleIV 06:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I does not make vandalism, I simply move .500 S&W - > .500 S&W Magnum. Nef 01:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Yes, but how made if the .500 S&W Magnum is Redirect's page and so already exist? Nef 01:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

You're fast! Keep it up. Kaisershatner 02:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Darn, you keep reverting before I have a chance to. What Internet service do you use? — Quin 06:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

The other fellow who was monitoring Favicon also removed the link from the nifty Adobe Photoshop plugin I provided last night. He has evidently left it alone for the time being. I put the link back on the page, because in my experience as a web designer, it has made the creation of favicons extremely convenient. I happen to create favicons sometimes as a hobby and have accumulated numerous pages with them (using the Adobeshop plugin). He did not feel he could take my word on my college background or the recommendation I was giving, so I provided links to Deans list just as he requested, in PDF format. I have added those to my wiki userpage if there are any questions. Edwardtbabinski I have known of that particular download (Adobe Plugin) since 2004, and it has always been spyware free, it's free for public software (GNU Licensing), like Wikipedia, they rely solely on donations, and have been good enough to provide their software for free. Now, I had taken notice in the talk section at one time a link was provided to free downloadable favicons -- but the link was broken and there was some debate to remove the link or not. I have several pages with royalty-free favicon downloads (spyware free, zip format) including a favicon blog, favicon webring anyone is welcomed to join, and an alternate site (http://www.artscape.us/) which I'm slowly adding pages to utilizing html color codes as a guide for website backgrounds / color coordination, and some of those have favicons as well. I put those on the web, just to help people, because I am aware some people may not be able afford the software that's required to design a site professionally, or how to properly fix the 404 error / missing favicon. If they use one they find on the web, they risk copyright infringement. I have had positive things said about the free downloads on several sites over time. The favicons I provide only need to be downloaded, renamed to favicon.ico and uploaded to their own site. I would be truly grateful if you could be so courteous as to put Free Favicons Downloads, Royalty Free Favicons back on the Favicon wiki page. Posted by Sharon Mooney

Sorry, but if there are other people removing the link, I'm definitely not going to put it back. I don't want to get drawn into an edit war. I'm not questioning or supporting the usefulness or otherwise of your website and software, nor am I particularly interested in the details of said software, so I'm likely to ignore any attempt to feed me detailed information. :) Thanks – Qxz 17:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I understand. Then, I simply put the link back. In my experience with web design, I know it will make a useful addition on subject of favicons, being spyware free and my own original creations for public access (Avoiding copyright infringement). Posted by Sharon Mooney

Seriously, you revert all the vandalism on RC just a few seconds before I do. Almost every time! Nice to know we have someone this good on RC patrol. :) Pyrospirit ^{Talk Contribs} 04:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

what is vandalism and how can i contact you without doing this im a noob to wiki – 05kinjac 05:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

kk ty mate – 05kinjac 05:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

hi!!! Too good for you 05:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for beating me to all the warnings and reporting pages for this jerk! :) Locriani 06:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert on my userpage! --Chris (talk) 23:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page 3 times --Adam1213 Talk + 06:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi there, You have revert my vandalized userpage. Here's my appreciation and tons of thanks   --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 08:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Jared Leto (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 08:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing up the vandalism to my userpage. Didn't notice that one before I saw it was fixed. :-) Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

And thanks for fixing the vandalism to my userpage too. Chris Bradshaw 10:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

An editor has nominated Afrikaans Wikipedia, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on invidiual Wikipedia language editions and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

An editor has nominated Bishnupriya Manipuri Wikipedia, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on invidiual Wikipedia language editions and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

An editor has nominated Telugu Wikipedia, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles on invidiual Wikipedia language editions and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 13:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 19:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

...to notify the author of a page when you nominate it for deletion. I just happened to notice it while looking through the current AfD nominations. —Doug Bell ^talk 04:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia_may_or_may_not_be_failing. Needs a humor tag though, think I'll start an edit war about that. :) ++Lar: t/c 22:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

You always seem to beat me to the punch on RC Patrol. For that I award you this

Don't mention it, you deserved it. ~Steptrip ^(talk) 02:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

How did you revert edits faster than most users? — Meteoroid ←  03:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Are you using AutoWikiBrowser? — Meteoroid ←  05:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi! I seem to run in to you quite often lately. Thanks for helping me reverting spammers! You feel like joining us on [2] and [3]? --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 09:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

You also gave Ganglyone a 'last warning' twice. nice. -- Ganglyone 09:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

We just like to make extra sure around here sometimes. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 10:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

STOP REVERT EDITING LINKS YOU SPAMMER! YOU'VE JUST UNDONE AN HOUR OF MY WORK! – Al4ie 09:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I'd noticed, but pop-ups summaries are spectacularly uninformative, and I only use it to revert 'orrible vandalism, normally....--Red Deathy 11:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

As per my AfD's all being named Adam - I am currently going through the Unassessed articles in the WPBiography project and upgrading most to stubs, but there a few that lack any notability and as such I have nominated for deletion. --Ozgod 04:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Oodles and noodles and bucket loads. Upwards to 130,000+ I figure if I can handle doing at least 100 a day... I will clear it out in...3 1/2 years... alone...yeah, fun. --Ozgod 04:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I did one for you, so only another 135,255 and you'll be done. I was thinking, isn't this the sort of thing that could be done by a bot? It wouldn't be able to check for notability, but it could check if the article had a stub tag, and upgrade it to a stub if so. Might save you some work – Qxz 04:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I feel more comfortable with the manul editing since it allows me to check to see if articles are of note or need any other editing such as {{cleanup}} or {{expert-subject|Biography}}. But thank you for that edit and contributing :) --Ozgod 04:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I've answered your reply at User talk:The Transhumanist/Help me. The Transhumanist   14:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit redone this time with a meaningful summary omitted in error last time - sorry 202.82.32.177 12:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for being vigilent, but it wasn't vandalism. I am Matei Tache, but I don't always log in. 89.120.193.125 12:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding a message you left at User talk:Konyali: don't bother discussing the edits with this user. This is a sockpuppet of known sockpuppeteer Burak18 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log). See Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Burak18 and the page histories of Turkey national football team and Galatasaray S.K. for more information. The only way to deal with him is to Revert, block, ignore. Aecis^Brievenbus 13:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I know, it was just a friendly notification, because this vandal will pop up again today. And tomorrow. And the day after tomorrow. This user will not change his ways, and any discussion with him is simply a waste of time. Time that could be better spent in other ways :) Anyway, thank you very much for reverting the edits. Aecis^Brievenbus 13:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't know that about sprotect. I was just trying to slow the crude vandalism that school's page is going thru. I can add it to my watchlist instead for now. Jmcnamera 13:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandal on my user page. --Dweller 13:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not so sure about this, but I think 24.107.112.243's latest contribution [4] was a newbie's test. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he mistook the article with the talk page. Seeing his IP adress didn't have any comments, he must be new.--Orthologist 14:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you're absolutely right. I was just checking for vandalism, and only noticed the above change. Of course, it was perfectly normal to warn him after what he did. Sorry for the misunderstanding.--Orthologist 14:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello, the IP Address 204.109.72.35 is used by a public school, and in some cases the students who access Wikipedia from this address use it for malicious intents. If you feel a ban is necessary, instead consult Brian Curls, the technology administrator at the school. BrianLC@leeschools.net He should be able to take care of the students. Thank you. Kobra 16:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism protector extraordinaire. Are you sure you are not a bot? ha ha You are an extremely valuable asset to wikipedia. Your cleanup on Star Wars and Indonesia (could there be two more different articles?) came up within 1 min of each other on my watch page. Merbabu 16:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Must be a bot. lol. So fast. Nice job. ~ Rollo44 16:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

You've made a revert edit every single minute of the past 7 hours, usually something around four edits per minute. It's good work, but what is making you do this?? ~ Rollo44 17:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)