Nikki311

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

• This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
• Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
• The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
• An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Debrah Miceli may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• com/pub/madusa-miceli/37/9b5/250|title=Linked In Profile|publisher=Linked In|accessdate=2014}08-24}}</ref> Before entering professional wrestling, she participated in both gymnastics and track, and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Funking Conservatory may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[Funking Conservatory Hardcore Championship

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I figured how to do it yaaas Rewind Wrestling (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just to note, the name of this editor is not "Rewind Wrestling", but "ClassicOnAStick". BMK (talk) 11:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Everything you told me about deletions I already new. You didn't even link to the deletion discussion page. Plus there is no reason that there should be an issue with this article. It was part of Heartland Wrestling Association. Next you're going to say that the rest of the HWA Championships are not notable either. Give me a break... Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 02:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2 Cold Scorpio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hennigan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nathan Jones (wrestler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Thomaselli Brothers page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help) and an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jose Estrada Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jesús Castillo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Allen3 ^talk 00:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Christy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike DiBiase. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help! I've been chipping away at it slowly and it's kind of sad that his role as a non-regular wrestler was so incredibly detailed (I chopped it down before you got to it) but his active career section has little detail (with some things like his feud with Flair and the Midnight Rider being mentioned almost in passing). Either way, thanks. It's much appreciated. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 22:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am asking you how you know what information to remove and what information to keep. Philgta5 (talk) 23:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am asking you how you know what information to remove and what information to keep. Philgta5 (talk) 23:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bushwhackers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Owens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

You ever going to finish one of those women's championship topics?--WillC 07:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I was wondering. I'm in 2006 and 2008 TNA stuff now. I can help do Ms. Jackie. I know the feeling. I have roughly 7 projects going on all at the same time, from PPVs, Titles, bios, stables, etc.--WillC 08:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

When I run across her debut, I'll start work on her TNA section.--WillC 03:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree that it's worth a shot. It's broad in coverage at this point, although some more detail to join it together would be necessary to take it beyond GA. I would definitely be up for helping in any way that I can during a GA review. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I respectively disagree, but am curious, how many times do you think a nickname needs to be used before you consider it a nickname? Ranze (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

In most wrestler articles I do not see 3rd party sources mentioning the nickname. For example at The Undertaker#In wrestling "The Phenom" and "The Deadman" and "The Last Outlaw" all merely link to his WWE.com profile, isn't that a 2nd party source? Ranze (talk) 09:03, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

I think you recognize that 'last outlaw' was used during one of his feuds though. Instead of immediately removing a nickname not mentioned in a source, I think it would be valuable for us to instead let it remain but fact-tag it for a while to give people a chance to find the source.

If you simply remove it then people don't even know to look for one, and unless you're keeping track of what's removed on the talk page, the chance to look it up is lost.

I think for something as simple as a nickname we do not need 3rd party sources. That level of proof is needed to interpret data, like what is the 'most popular' nickname, or something like that. Simply that something WAS a nickname is not an interpretation, even a primary source should be enough to make note of it. Ranze (talk) 10:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

How many times was Summer Rae called "First Lady of NXT" though? The PWinsider and Pro Wrestling Torch references only establish its use in 2 consecutive events. Does that mean if I hear 'submissive summer' or 'sweet summer' or something along those lines, it would be adequate? Ranze (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just a courtesy note to say I have removed the proposed deletion notice from the above article. I can't blame you for nominating the article in the condition it was in. It is not the first time I have come across that editor's work. I have translated the biography from the Japanese wikipedia, so we now have something legible to work with. Unfortunately, of the references used in the Japanese article, only one is available online so a lot of it appears unsourced. On the other hand, his name does receive more than 100 google news hits. They may be just passing mentions, but I think it deserves more scrutiny at an AFD rather than a PROD. P.S. If you ever come across similar articles about Japanese wrestlers in the future, drop me a line and I'll have a go at cleaning it up. Regards, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:17, 2 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Border City Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlito. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please note that while draft articles can on occasion be deleted for various reasons, they cannot be deleted under category G13 until they have existed without significant editing for six months.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm sorry for any wrong edits and for calling people names.

Quick question. If mark henry's opinion isnt worthy of being mentioned with regards to taker's drawing power then why is ross's opinion mentioned on austin'spage abt the same thing!!?

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect !Bang!. Since you had some involvement with the !Bang! redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pppery 01:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ayu_Tsukimiya, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Being ill is fundamentally different from being dead. The death section also includes tons of information which is about the reactions to his death as well as his funeral and tributes, which has absolutely nothing nothing to do at all with his personal life whatsoever. I have no idea what you mean by "helps distinguish it as real". Why on gods earth would anyone assume a section way beneath his performans career would be non-real?★Trekker (talk) 02:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Could we please keep this discussion confined to one talkpage please? It's impossible to have a conversation when there is comments on the different places.

As for your points, I don't see what other articles have to do with this situation. If there is enough information to fill a section there might as well be a section. I don't see what need there is to have a stone hard policy regardign this when it's definitely a case by case situation. In Pipers case it seems to me to make much more sense for it to not be a subsection of the personal life section.

"Being ill leads to being dead in most case" this is fundamentally untrue. People can be ill or sick many times, you only die once, which is definitive and irreversible. Many illnesses don't lead death.★Trekker (talk) 02:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC) PS I did not see your edit to the comment before I wrote this. Either way, I still don't agree with the point.★Trekker (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@*Treker: I still think consistency is best, but I've wasted enough time on this silly disagreement. I'm not going to change Piper's page again, but I still disagree with you. Let's just agree to disagree. Nikki♥311 03:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I'm sorry if I came of as confrontative or rude. I didn't mean to but I know I can be pretty aggressive sometimes.★Trekker (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@*Treker: It's totally cool. Nobody agrees about everything. No hard feelings on this end. Nikki♥311 03:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Can you complete this article naming? Reason is non-notable professional wrestler who hasn't competed in a major promotion (TNA, ROH, AAA, NJPW, Only developmental territory by WWE etc. etc.) and shows no evidence of passing WP:GNG. Only source Cagematch bio. Thanks. 2804:7F4:FB80:FB82:7C16:CAAB:4C6B:A (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Done Nikki♥311 17:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

A bit confused about the Notability tag that you added. We listed many reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic. Could you please advise? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:EE0D:D800:519E:53B2:14B3:9462 (talk) 01:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Give me some time, and I'll post my response at Talk:Anarchy Championship Wrestling. Nikki♥311 03:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Done Nikki♥311 08:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page should not be deleted. you have been going round and trying to delete all my pages. I share an IP address and any problems caused wasn't even by me! This whole thing is a mess and now because I have been banned, You try to delete everything! I want justice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.182.120 (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for making the Knight wrestling family template! I can't figure out how to thank for an edit that makes something so I'll do here.★Trekker (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. Nikki♥311 03:41, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I am a Wikipedia editor, and I just read some of the information that you supply and I am very impressed as you seem to know a lot as you are very well sourced with your info, can you please help with some current problems that I am having with Wikipedia right now? (being I need to know how to restore pages that were unnecessarily merged with other pages and shouldn't have been as they should be stand alone articles). Also think of the people who spend all their time making those articles and all for nothing just to see their work go right down the drain. Also just like you I am a wrestling fan and have written articles on wrestlers as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 07:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

I hope Nikki311 is ok with me giving input on their talkpage, (sorry if you think it's inappropriate Nikki).

Hi, Davidgoodheart, the thing is that we can't keep an article just because you, me, or anyone else has put a lot of effort into it or are very proud of it. One of the articles that I've made is most likely going to be deleted soon and it probably won't even be merged. You just kind of have to deal with it even if it's disappointing.★Trekker (talk) 12:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Davidgoodheart: The very nature of Wikipedia is that other people can change, merge, or delete your articles and unfortunately sometimes that means your hard work goes down the drain. If you have a question about a specific article, please link to it, and I can probably give you more information. Nikki♥311 12:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for responding to me, as other editors and administrators sometimes don't. I will get back to you in a bit, I am just occupied with a few things right now. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nikki

I need your help currently I'm making Draft article of WhatCulture pro wrestling and I wanted to make an at least a good article, but I don't know if it is well organized or if it has notability enough under the WP:PW/RS, so could you help on organizing and sourcing the article?

Thanks for the time

TheBuilder456 (talk) 22:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

@TheBuilder456: Before I say anything, I think it is important to note that this page was recently deleted via community consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Culture Pro Wrestling, so this draft may not become an article for a long while. With that said, I will give you come pointers to help improve the article in the meantime. First of all, the page is kind of busy, I think that leaving off the tournaments might be a good place to start. A list of winners is fine, but all those brackets seems overboard. Second of all, not all of the sources listed at WP:PW/RS prove notability as they are industry specific and report mostly WP:ROUTINE results (ex: CageMatch). The websites listed under "Mainstream" will help prove notability if they have significant coverage of the subject (not just match results). Adding more mainstream sources is the only way to help prove notability. Nikki♥311 01:44, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Fab Moolah and Richter.JPG. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I was asked to change Ashley Massaro's profile picture on here as she doesn't like the one she has now. I did and it was changed back, just wondering if the picture up now could be changed to something else as she herself as said she doesn't like that one.. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerseyguy12 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just noticed that in your edit of the list of YouTubers you overwrote two existing entries in the list. Was that intentional, and if so what was your rationale? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:37, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Not sure how that happened. Fixed. Nikki♥311 21:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

"It is WP:OR to just see a move and describe it as different (unless you are an "expert in the field"; or even if it is obviously the case). Wikipedia isn't always about commonsense, unfortunately. Nikki♥311 00:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)"

I understand, and remember, the logic of this stuff but it really is complete nonsense when OR applies to things with everyones own eyes. Years and years ago I got in a wiki fight with someone over Chris Hero of all things who made up false descriptions of moves based on their names, and was guessing what they were - most memorably Rubiks Cube they kept changing to Octopus Hold.

The problem was the Rubiks Cube is an electric chair driver, and no amount of being told it was OR from using video to show that changed the situation. It's OR extended perversely. Like I said I'm older now and have the perspective to not fight on Hiromu Takahashi over a wrong description, based on sources that are google translated from Japanese, but it is frustrating that wikipedia has become the respository of move lists on the internet and thus there are no other sources for moves (nor was there before wikipedia, it was assumed knowledge) so you end up in weird cases like this. –– Lid^(Talk) 05:40, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey Dude, Paige is now yet to return as seen in performance center.

Regards Broken nutshell (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Josh Lewis wrestler page does meet criteria Hello Nikki. Just looking over everything here. And it seems to me that this page does meet criteria for professional wrestling. I do agree with you that it doesn't meet criteria in bodybuilding. References are very good examples Pro Wrestling illustrated. NWA website. As well as various other sources. I have no affiliates will NWA or anyone else. But I've done a lot of editing on this page. I was proud of the work I've done. I've noticed you delete a lot of NWA pages. I hoping you would give me a chance to fix any issues. Hopefully you will let this page stay up. NWATilteUpdates (talk) 21:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey Nikki,

Just wanted to let you know that User:Jasonecohen6 has a conflict of interest with Josh Lewis (wrestler) and NWA Supreme; he appears to be the webmaster for nwasupreme.com, as shown in the reviews on the page. Just thought it might be a quick note on that deletion discussion. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

tl;dr - don't cite The Sun in BLPs - ever. There is either a better source to use, or the information given is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Related reading here. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Gail Kim, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lacey (wrestler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Nikki311|<font color="Teal">'''Nikki'''</font>]]<font color="Salmon">'''♥'''</font>[[User Talk:Nikki311|<font color="Purple">'''311'''</font>]] : Nikki♥311

to

[[User:Nikki311|<b style="color: Teal;">Nikki</b>]]<b style="color: Salmon;">♥</b>[[User Talk:Nikki311|<b style="color: Purple;">311</b>]] : Nikki♥311

—Anomalocaris (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here.★Trekker (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I don't know where you got the logic of being on the apron is being in the match. Or where you heard that for that matter. No battle royal has ever operated like that. If they are on the apron, how can they be eliminated when they have to be tossed over the top rope? Logic trumps all. You have to be in the ring to be officially in the match. Or so logic would dictate. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 22:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Fishhead2100: I never said that. I think you meant to leave this message on the talk page of User:InedibleHulk. He's clearly the one who said that per here. Thanks. Nikki♥311 22:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

That's my bad. I thought it was you. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate that you removed the original research at Ruby Riott#Chikara (2013–2016), but unfortunately you also removed {{Citation needed}} templates when the problem was not resolved. Both paragraphs that you edited still lacked citations. Thank you for all your editing (you have a lot more edits than I do!), but please be more precise while performing surgery. Peaceray (talk) 05:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that, IPs are running rampant and your source got caught in the crossfire. I do apologise for the error on my part. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 20:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I see that the Diva Dirt discussion is dead. Three have opposed which includes yourself. I think it is safe to close the discussion and deem it unreliable even though the interviews could be one of the few things that could be referenced. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 19:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm fine with that. Nikki♥311 20:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi there,

Saw the page Commonwealth Cup (professional wrestling) had been marked for deletion for WP:GNG related reasons. Was just wondering how to go about making a case for keeping it. I don't want to just delete the code that marks it and have it get removed anyway. What sort of sources/information could I provide to prove that it's notable enough to keep? Thanks, Bryan

I just edit wwe divas signatures and finishers if i have to, and i promise that my sources are reliable. If you have a problem about what i do with stuff that i do, let me know — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collin Sears (talk • contribs) 23:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

What's going on Nikki311? It's the King Gemini. I hope you remember who I am. Well anyway, I hope all is good and well with you. I know what haven't spoken in a while, but I'm here to ask a favor: I'm trying to get nominated to become an administrator and since you and I are friends, I was hoping that maybe you could nominate me. You don't have to give me an answer right away. You can take your time and think about it, but I hope you say that you'll nominate me. I hope to hear from you soon, friend. The King Gemini (talk) 23:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@King Gemini: Why do you want to be an administrator, and what do you hope to accomplish? Nikki♥311 01:18, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I want to be an administrator not for my own personal gain, but because I am a natural born leader. What I hope to accomplish is to make sure that the rules apply to everyone and not just certain users. There's more, but I can't think of what I had prepared to say. But what I put is it good so far? The King Gemini (talk) 01:28, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@King Gemini: I'm going to decline. I see you were recently in an edit war, and one of the biggest expectations of an administrator is that they can work well with others and help solve disputes. Keeping a list of users who you don't like makes it seem you like you won't be fair and impartial. In addition, as far as I can tell, you have little experience participating in policy discussions, AfD, and writing Good or Featured Content. You can nominate yourself, but I don't recommend you do that at this time. Work on these areas, and try again in the future. Nikki♥311 03:08, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello :) I have seen that you are one of the participants of the Wikiproject YouTube, I thought it important to tell you that this article is considered for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juanpa Zurita . I'm going to warm the rest of the WikiProject team. Bye :) --Viajaste (talk) 11:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey, just wondering why you changed the HOF event articles to a list assessment, such as [1]? Looking at the article itself WWE Hall of Fame (2017) it focuses on the event itself and then the list is further down, after the event section. - Galatz^Talk 13:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Galatz: The list is the most important part if the article. In my opinion, all the inductors can be added as a separate column in the table. With few exceptions, the information about what they talked about during their acceptance speeches is fluff and should be deleted. If more information about the event was added like ratings, venue, reception, etc. that would make these more like articles than lists. For example, I left WWE Hall of Fame (2014) as C-class because it had the most developed prose (the "Aftermath"). But overall, it won't hurt my feelings if you change it back. Nikki♥311 15:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, the way I am trying to expand the articles, its making the article about the event itself rather than just the class. Based on the discussions prior to breaking it out, that seemed to me to be the more notable thing, was the event, not the list of people. In 2018 for example it has a background section rather than just the list. I haven't had a chance to watch the ceremony yet, but when I do I will add an event section. I know these articles all still need more work, so perhaps once they are done, and more like 2014, we can revisit. - Galatz^Talk 16:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I created the page for the Iconic Duo as they are now appearing on WWE TV as part of the main roster. Please don't delete the page. If there are issues I can try and resolve them but it would be nice of you to keep it up.

Thank You
TheVaughano (talk) 23:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have added some creditable sources to The Iron Sheik and Nikolai Volkoff, and plan to add even more sources to it in the near future and expand to it as well. I don't think an article like this should be deleted in any way. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC) (talk) 23:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Davidgoodheart: When creating an article on tag team, you need to add each wrestlers stats such as height and weight in the infobox. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 16:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Fishhead2100: I know, and I wanted to, but I am not really that good with infobox stuff like that since I want to add it the same way in size and weight format the way that The Twin Towers stats are. Could you please add it for me? I would really like that. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Davidgoodheart: Take a look at the code when editing and see how it's done there. It's pretty basic stuff. But yes, I'll do it. I don't have a problem doing it, but you need to learn as well. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 20:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 15:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

If I wanted to get involved again I'd be on the side of defenders and bringing them in. Years ago I argued that the moves in wrestling are part of the story and to remove them is to remove direct aspects of the sport/entertainment. Pro wrestling is a carnie combination of entertainment and it occupies an odd area, but being in an odd area doesn't mean it's wrong or a walled garden.

Oh and seeing the Zack Sabre stuff someone kept removing my source, https://twitter.com/zacksabrejr/status/946509572524662784?lang=en no idea why –– Lid^(Talk) 19:59, 7 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I see Devon Moore has been deleted. Can you give me your opinion about these wrestlers? They are similar to Moore, just worked in CZW/OVW. Kenny Bolin Niles Young Jamin Olivencia --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes. I'm busy at the moment, but I'll take a look and let you know my thoughts. Nikki♥311 23:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@HHH Pedrigree: Bolin seems not notable to me. Most of the information about him online is routine results, random podcast appearances, and his self-published book. Young also has mostly routine and primary coverage, so I would also deem him not notable. Olivencia, however, is probably borderline notable. He just did a quick search and found some coverage [2], [3], and [4]. So that combined with his stunt/TV/film/theater work and his professional wrestling career...I think he passes WP:ENTERTAINER. Nikki♥311 10:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Great. Thanks. I'm gonna take a look on CZW articles. There is several champions and I don't knwo if they are notable. Ex, The Messiah (wrestler) Justice Pain Scotty Vortekz Nick Berk --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Nikki. If you see carefully, the second source describes the F5 as Lesnar's finisher. "after kicking out of four F5 finishers from Brock Lesnar". The first one is for the technical description. I think it's correcto to describe the move as his finisher. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@HHH Pedrigree: My mistake. Because of the way the citations were in the sentence I only looked at the first one. I'm going to add a quote to the second source so nobody else makes the same mistake. Nikki♥311 22:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nikki311,

I've recently been looking for editors to invite to join the new page reviewing team, and after reviewing your editing history, I think you would be a good candidate. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; the new page reviewing team needs help from experienced users like yourself.

Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us. If you choose to apply, you can drop an application over at WP:PERM/NPR. If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board.

Cheers, and hope to see you around, — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 07:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Nikki311. I've done some recent edits to the Ball Ground, Georgia article. Looking at the talk page, it appears this article has not been reviewed by anyone since about 2007 when you reviewed it. I wonder if it would be any trouble for you to review it again as I'm trying to get the edits to bring it to more than a "start" class article, as I'm also doing with other articles of Cherokee county articles. Would you mind, if you have the time, reviewing the article again? Thanks ahead of time, whether you do or not. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 20:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Triple H, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 17:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Not sure if you're a fan of the show, or if you're just assessing article in general, but you're invited to Wikipedia:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race, if interested. Either way, happy editing, and thanks for your assessment work. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Another Believer: Thank you. I already joined and added myself to Category:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race participants. Nikki♥311 22:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh, wonderful! Sorry, I just didn't see your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject_RuPaul's_Drag_Race#Participants. Thanks for replying. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Ultimate Muscle episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Tokyo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barrett Brown (wrestler) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrett Brown (wrestler) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sismarinho (talk) 05:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! I posted a question over at the Wikipedia help desk, and User:Orangemike said you were the person to get in touch with. So, back in 2007 you merged Rib (professional wrestling) into Glossary of professional wrestling terms. The way you described the article and its examples was "cruft." I had to look that up! Anyway, I've never written an article before but I saw an old (2005) post on the glossary's talk page that suggested someone write an article on ribbing. I knew other wrestling terms have gotten their own articles (like Heel and Face, for example) and I knew I could find plenty of sources - so, long story short, I wrote the article. I didn't realize at the time, though, that if a redirect has been put in place, you can't just delete the redirect and submit your new article. I assume the article back then was poorly written and poorly cited. Mine is not, so at least that won't be an issue. I also made a serious effort to write it in a narrative, encyclopedic manner instead of just making it a list. I don't know if you think it's too much of a ... niche subject (but hell, we have plenty of articles on much more obscure topics on here), but I think that my article is of Wikipedia quality and is definitely preferable to the 9 words ribbing is given in the Glossary. I posted the article I wrote in my Sandbox, maybe you'd like to look at it? I hope it's up to the standards I think it is, and that my 5 hours of Internet research and writing weren't in vain! "Yes...It's Raining" 00:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC) I’ve looked at the history of the original rib article and it was a poorly cited list before being redirected in 2007 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rib_(professional_wrestling)&diff=141685290&oldid=140944427. Also, could you link to the sandbox entry since that would help in determining if it’s meets the standards to be an aricle? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.254.92 (talk) 06:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I'm sorry. You can go to this link for my sandbox and see it as I see it, right? I'm also having this discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling, so let's talk there as much as possible so we're not having a convo on Nikki311's Talk Page (Nikki311, I brought my proposal there since I didn't know when I'd hear back from you, feel free to answer here or there whenever you want or get a chance).

I've replied there. Nikki♥311 08:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

-- For the drive co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hulk Hogan's Celebrity Championship Wrestling, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hulk Hogan's Celebrity Championship Wrestling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

In 2019 you participated in a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara, which resulted in a consensus to redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11). I have now taken the article to deletion review, at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 September 28#Plastique Tiara. I am informing everyone who participated in the deletion discussion, except two indef-blocked accounts and an IP address which last edited two years ago, in case they would like to contribute to the deletion review. JBW (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Roswell High School (Georgia) has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. (t · c) buidhe 13:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kurt Angle has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Christmas in the United States (1946–1964) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wizardman 00:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

You had once clamed that the Twin Towers (professional wrestling) would never be more than a stub. I just wanted to show you how much myself and other have expanded it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 14:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ralphie the Buffalo has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Molly Holly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 08:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stacy Keibler has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Shelton Benjamin for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 03:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Torrie Wilson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stephanie McMahon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Riya Sen has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. X (talk) 05:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Schulz, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Schulz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Awesome Kong has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (trout me!) 07:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Minnesota Golden Gophers men's basketball has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Laura Robson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply