Mallanox

Just catching up with you bud. This is Sid from Facebook. ;-).

Sidna (talk)

Brianna Brown - You stated that this article was deleted because she was not a famous enough actress, yet google has over a half million results for her name, including articles that speak of her as an up-and-coming Hollywood actress. As a matter of fact, she had a relatively major role in tonight's episode of Criminal Minds, playing the part of a serial killer. Could you consider restoring this page please? (Despite the fact that no one responded to the prod within the usual 5 day time limit.) Lunarknight737 (talk) 04:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey Mallanox, I see you deleted the article because there wasn't enough context. Well im taking on the task to recreate the article again. Here is my draft: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chadpriddle/Emarosa I'm trying to get an admin to remove the protection on the page and was wondering if you could help me out. I went through the usual process but cant get any help, so I was told to talk to one of the admins that have previously deleted the page. Let me know if you could do it. Thanks! Chadpriddle (talk) 07:32, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

That sounds like a good idea Mallanox! Thanks for the quick response. Chadpriddle (talk) 15:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help! Hopefully thee article will stick this time. Chadpriddle (talk) 05:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Karamello24 Article deleted and Why? Why was the article on the association of black psychologist deleted? it was referenced appropirately? your feedback was a bare minamal, Can you explain why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karamello24 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, K-Rino, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-Rino. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

--Badgernet (talk) 11:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

You deleted Big Gee (rapper) all and well by WP:PROD but there are still a fair number of other pages which link there, including one which is a redirect and should be deleted along with it, unless there is some other Big Gee I don't know of that should be redirected to instead. ~ Jafet (spam) 16:29, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. ~ Jafet (spam) 12:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

My bad, overlooked the first speedy attempt. Still think notability is shaky though, but you decide ;) At least it taught me to look at the rev history for a few seconds longer next time! Regards, Shoombooly (talk) 15:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also, while I'm at it, songs in general can't be speedied? (as you handled those as well) Shoombooly (talk) 15:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

This newsletter was delivered by §hepBot around 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC). ShepBot (talk) 16:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mallanox, would you be able to please e-mail me the pre-spam version of that article? Thanks. GreenJoe 19:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I have a different user I work on that school with, and I just wanted to restore the proper article. GreenJoe 20:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are you fucking nuts? Put Alan Cabal's article back. I hate Wikipedia. This idiotic deletionism of useful articles. I am going to go shoot one of the many fucking fictional characters wandering around this junkyard of meaninglessness if Alan Cabal is not restored. I do not have the means of doing this, but was frightened out of my gourd when I noticed that he had become a red link. If you are not totally to blame for this obscenity feel free to disregard some of my venom, direct it at others, but ultimately rectify my grievance. Also, I am not Alan Cabal, but believe he is fucking notable.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 07:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just trying to keep it real and bring a little color to some of the goings-on around here, which seem almost purposedly lifeless at times. Yet, fact remains, Alan Cabal should rise again.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 18:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I will try to keep civility in mind next time.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 20:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow, talk about gross incivility. Anyway, Mallanox, you mentioned that it had been contested at DRV. I can't find the link to the DRV discussion. Can you give it to me? Thanks. --Ave Caesar (talk) 23:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD created...it'll be interesting to see if certain people go ape shit over it. I will admit, a very small part of the decision to do it came from the fact that the user had the gall to tell me, "There will be no further pursuit. If you are looking for something to do..." Oy. --Ave Caesar (talk) 02:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I apologize for this tirade from a week ago. What can you do? Occasionally the mind wants to vent but it was uncalled for. Additionally, I have started a deletion review on said article.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 17:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alan Cabal. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Manhattan Samurai (talk) 17:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I already apologized. I simply overacted at seeing someone else seemingly being subjected to the same sneaky tactics that were used on me when I first joined wikipeida. I see now that that was not your intention with is why I apologized on the WP:ANI] page and struck through my comments on that other users page. I apologize again for my overreaction and I am sorry that I did not come to you at first int he first place. Smith Jones (talk) 17:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

As with many things in Wikipedia, figuring out just how to nominate an entry to be considered for deletion is taking far longer than I currently have the time for. This would be my first such article, as I have a pretty high tolerance for "notablity." Yet this one fairly screams for it: Party Unity My Ass. For one, that's not the name of the organization (see the reference section). Another, there are virtually no sources for any of the material concerning the make up of these related organizations. RoyBatty42 (talk) 22:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've restored the speedy deletion tag. A discography by itself doesn't denote notability. See WP:BAND for guidance. Exxolon (talk) 23:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mallanox

Please ref :12:54, 10 June 2007 Mallanox (Talk | contribs) deleted "Hamsaya" ‎ (Deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamsaya)

This is to request you to please reverse this deletion .For the following reasons.

• The article was deleted as incorrectly interpreted .
• The article is of Historical notability, which can be established from reliable sources.
• The new article can be rewritten with much improved content and citations from verifiable sources.

Cheers
Intothefire (talk) 18:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm curious -- why was Spengler (columnist) deleted? Your username is listed in the deletion log beside it, but there appears to be no corresponding AfD page. jdb (talk) 02:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not trying to "cross" you. See that you killed it before. Just putting this in discussion so you know. I think an article is reasonable, given that he's not some fan or something, but has a lot of Analog publications. I will keep the article short (as reasonable compromise on Plante's notability.) BTW, I have no personal associtation with him. Not his buddy, mom, fan, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TCO (talk • contribs) 14:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I suspect that the person uploading all those schools is a secretary or webmaster in the school district. I've advised him/her on WP:WPSCHOOLS's system, and even provided a starter redlink. Maybe the end result will be a nice Education in Taoyuan County article. (Looks like Terriersfan is on it already. Well, then maybe a nice Education in Bade City.) Phlegm Rooster (talk) 10:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello Mallanox I saw that our Industryplayer page was delted and wrote to MZMcBride about it as he/she was listed as the deleter. My post and reply were as follows : Hi - can you assist please - you are recorded as deleting the IndustryPlayer page on 6/6/2008 at 18:32 with a code csd r1. Apparently this means "Redirect to non-existent page#". Could you explain what the problem was - this page was a valid page for some time and we don't understand why you took it down. I am willing to rewrite or edit the page if need be to make it good again - I understand the copy still exists somewhere in your system Sunshinebr (talk) 11:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

IndustryPlayer was deleted by Mallanox (talk · contribs). It was deleted under the Proposed deletion guidelines. If you have further questions, Mallanox should be able to help you out. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2008 (UTC) "

Can you help me please - what was the basis for deletion, what can I do about getting it back.

Many thanks Sunshinebr (talk) 07:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mallanox I would appreciate some comment on this - I would like to tresolve the old issue or start again. Thank you for your assistance Sunshinebr (talk) 06:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mallanox,

I'm the Games Editor for NAG Magazine in South Africa, and I noticed the page on the magazine was deleted (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Age_Gaming), with the reason "no assertion of notability". I'm not sure if I understand, but I'd like to know what I must provide for it to be undeleted.

Thank you.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Locked Up (film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Neelix (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

This newsletter was sent by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC) by the request of Moni3 (talk)Reply

The Wikipedia article for the upcoming Cory McAbee's film Stingray Sam is nominated for deletion. Please contribute to the discussion.--DrWho42 (talk) 03:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Appears inappropriate: The family are responsible for a number of historic placemarks (ie just out of dark ages) around Broadstairs and also made a significant mark in their offspring in the British merchant and navy marine. Obvious that interested parties can go to other sources. Off to other sources myself. 82.153.137.211 (talk) 22:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Frank Harvey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Notability not established, unreferenced

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 06:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Blocker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No references or external links that even prove the existence or notability of this person.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. magnius (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Greg Coffey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Coffey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --SquidSK ^(1MC•log) 06:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Mallanox! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 39 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Carolyn Pfeiffer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Toyomichi Kurita - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Gary Barber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Robert Fraisse - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Stephen E. Rivkin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Alain Sarde - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Franco Ferrini - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Laurie MacDonald - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Tim Suhrstedt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Stephen H. Burum - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Rick Shaine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no indication that this editor meets WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Bernardo Bonezzi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP, June 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

User:Kagegod/Testarotho, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kagegod/Testarotho and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Kagegod/Testarotho during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 01:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

[3]You were the closing admin on the last AfD, so I'm notifying you of another AfD. The person who submitted it didn't contact anyone.--Wikimegamaster 18:52, 10 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimegamaster (talk • contribs)

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

(sad!) come back one day :) – SJ + 02:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I was going to write a few pages on fundamental process analysis concepts such as flow time, flow rate, cycle time, etc. I found that you deleted an article on flow time back in 2008 because you didn't consider it a significant process analysis concept. Can you explain that? IMHO, these concepts are fundamental and are the foundation of process analysis.
eappleton (talk) 13:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Films based on the works of Jules Verne, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 13:56, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The Biophysical Society is currently organizing a group effort for a WikiProject to improve Wikipedia content and coverage in the large interdisciplinary area of biophysics, internationally. Since the previous page of that name was deleted because of a short temporary existence with only a bot edit, I presume those issues would not apply to this new effort. Please let me know if there are objections to this revival. Dcrjsr (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

(delivered by mabdul 23:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC))Reply

The article Not Angels But Angels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking reliable third party coverage. No GNews hits, and IMDb only has a few blogs (that don't qualify as good sources)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:50, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

The article Tyr (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Marvin J. McIntyre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Manikin (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 11:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Species films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 19:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bloodsport films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 09:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bad News Bears films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Witchfire (Marvel Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Headphase (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 12 § X films -> Films about X on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply