Lurlock

Ever find out what the deal is with Shoshannah Stern? Can deafness actually be inherited? I'm wondering the answer to that myself... -Mike Payne (T • C) 19:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, according to her IMDB page, I'd say so. I still think the wording in that sentence is somewhat awkward, but I'd say it's confirmed. Was so long ago I posted that question that I don't really care enough to change it anymore though. Lurlock 22:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much for filling in the IMDB details and such on the episode list. I was doing it as I filled in the descriptions, but obviously that task wasn't being completed quickly! (oops). Thanks again!--LKAdriaan (talk) 21:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Never Ever (1996 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 23:01, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Lurlock. How's your work on the list on the world's top cities going? Just for curiosity, did you need the information for a private project (that's how I understood it) or for Wikipedian work? The reason I ask is this discussion, where someone tried to use my mention of Demographia as an argument against my views on the Copenhagen Metropolitan definition.--Pjred (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is for a private project, though I suppose I could share the list if you're interested. Mind you, it's very subjective, particularly on the lower end of a scale. Part of the reason for this was that I was using the data to populate a map, and I ended up leaving out a lot of cities (particularly in more crowded regions such as Germany, Japan, northeastern US, and parts of China and India) just because I couldn't graphically fit the labels in and still make them readable. But at any rate, I didn't need 100% accuracy for this, just a good baseline to start from. The project that I'm using this for is meant to be a fictional world set many years in the future, and the list will be changed significantly (again) to reflect the story line. (e.g. more cities appearing in northern Canada, Russia, and Scandinavia, and possibly southern Argentina and Chile, to represent the effects of global warming, and then there's all the political stuff - you can't make a map of the future without making political statements, unfortunately. Do we free Tibet? Taiwan? How about Kashmir - part of India, Pakistan, China, or its own country? How much more will change in eastern Europe, a region that's seen a lot of national boundaries shift in the last few decades? Stuff like that.)

I do think that any such list is going to be unfairly biased towards China and India, simply because of the greater numbers of people living there - going by population data alone, they will always overwhelm any list. So another stage of this will be trying to get other data, such as the GDP and GNP for each city (when possible) and using that to determine the overall "wealth" of a city, and adjusting the importance value accordingly.

All of this is of course way beyond what I expect to be able to do on my own, even with the help of such resources as Wikipedia and the other demographics sources you cited. (That's what the writing staff will be for once we hire one.) But of course, this list will unfortunately be subjective by its very nature, and certainly qualify as Original Research (which they really hate around here), so I doubt I could get away with putting this sort of thing in a WP article. Lurlock (talk) 05:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sounds almost like an overwelming task. Impressive! I would actually be interested in seeing how you 'predict the future', so to speak. So, feel free to send a list if you have anything available. You can contact me by the 'E-mail this user' function on my user page.--Pjred (talk) 09:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Wevie Stonder, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wevie Stonder. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Wizardman 01:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Wevie Stonder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 03:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Hotel Babylon has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – sgeureka ^t•c 11:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Futurama characters , please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article List of directors who appear in their own films is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of directors who appear in their own films until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the article. Can't wait to see the films. :-) Gurt Posh (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, I guess? I just stumbled across the show on the On-Demand channel on cable, and when I went to look it up here I just found a couple of bands. I'm sure the article could use a bit more work - some descriptions of the episodes, maybe, and some kind of template side-bar like a lot of articles have, but I'll leave that to people who know how to do that better. Lurlock (talk) 02:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Just to say I wrote something of an answer to your question on the chopsticks talk page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chopsticks#IS_there_any_connection_to_Confucius.3F Cheers.--Rsm77 (talk) 08:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply