User talk:Invertzoo/Archive 85

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prophysaon andersoni, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thefullwiki.org/Prophysaon.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

The website Core Bot found is a Mirror Site for Wikipedia. Enough said. Invertzoo (talk) 13:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

• Yep, no issues here copyright wise, although when re-using text between articles our license does need attribution (i.e saying where the text came from). Simply making the initial edit summary say something like "Content from (article), see that page for attribution" is plenty. The bot will still probably flag it, but it can be removed as you did in this case. Thanks for your work! Crow^Caw 21:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

You are quite right, thanks for reminding me! Invertzoo (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi! thanks for you review of my draft Simeon_Soden it was most helpful, I think I've addressed the issues raised (although I'm still very new to the wonderful world of wiki contribution). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simbo401 (talk • contribs) 10:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I saw you made some tentative edits on this article (In situ electron microscopy). Please join the fun in trying to get it readable. My writing is probably too dense and technical for this particular topic, and this article could use a lot of help as it is loaded with misinformation and too poorly developed to understand. I know the topic well, and I can probably organize and focus the article, but it needs another hand than mine to make it good for a general encyclopedia. Thank you! MicroPaLeo (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi MicroPaleo. I am happy to try to lighten up your prose a bit when you work on this article. I don't really know anything about in situ EM, but back in the 1970s I did TEM. I will try to keep an eye on the article as it evolves, but feel free to remind me if I forget about it at any point. Invertzoo (talk) 13:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, a background of any kind in EM will help, but just basic editing skills are the most important. MicroPaLeo (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem, give me a heads up when you add another section. best, Invertzoo (talk) 21:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)