Gil gosseyn
Welcome!
editHello, Gil gosseyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Philip K. Dick. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Viriditas (talk) 22:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Re: Philip K. Dick
edit- Deleted the entry because, in cited book review references, any allusion to PKD are made by the author of the REVIEW, NOT the author of the book being reviewed
Which is exactly how it should be; Wikipedia is based on secondary, not primary sources. See WP:RS for more info. On the other hand, if what you are trying to say, is that these opinions are not well supported, then the material you removed should not be added back. But keep in mind, we write articles primarily on what reliable secondary sources say, not primary. You may want to discuss your removal on the talk page of the article. Viriditas (talk) 22:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Pruitt Taylor Vince
editI corrected the 'Filmography' table for the "59 Seconds" entry. It was listed in the table BETWEEN 2012 and 2013, with the Title in the Year column, the Character in the Title column, and the Notes in the Character column. I created a "2014" section, and put the entry information in the proper columns. I used the IMDb "59 Seconds" page as a reference. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1720035/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_1 Gil gosseyn (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Talk Page etiquette
editIt is a bad idea to add new discussion material to extremely stale discussions from years ago on personal talk pages. Since this was a content matter it should be discussed at the article talk page. Capitalismojo (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Editors can and are banned for personal attacks. You will no doubt be if you persist in making entirely baseless personal attacks. I expect an apology and suggest you apologize to Dr Fleischman as well. Capitalismojo (talk) 05:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Gil gosseyn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Gil gosseyn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Gil gosseyn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 28
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Larry Sanders Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Attempted highjacker.
editSomeone has been repeatedly trying to log into my account recently. I don't know why, unless they want to use it for mischief. Or maybe they just have a similar login and are "fat-fingering" it. If anyone knows anything about this, please let me know. Gil gosseyn (talk) 09:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Gil gosseyn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Karen Morton
editHi, my issue with your edit was that the you used a Facebook post as a reference, and those are not considered reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. Of the links you listed, only the one for Obituaries in the Performing Arts, 2014 would be considered reliable—Noblemania is a blog, Topclassactions.com is basically a commercial site, and IMDb and Find A Grave are user-edited.
Also, when leaving comments on talk pages, please sign them by adding ~~~~ at the end; this will add your username and when you posted the comment. Trivialist (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
I have updated the reference to the one Obituaries in the Performing Arts, 2014. I apologize for forgetting to sign the comment. Gil gosseyn (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
editPlease do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- /Alex/21 10:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Answer the question, please. Why are you reverting my edit, and why aren't you giving an explanation. I SHOULDN'T HAVE TO ASK. Gil gosseyn (talk) 10:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Not reverting. Try again. -- /Alex/21 12:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editSuzy McCoppin
editHey! I just wanted to reach out because I saw the edit you made and then retracted on the Suzy McCoppin talk page. I'm assuming you realized your own mistake but just in case, I wanted to make sure you knew that Suzy McCoppin is her actual name and Julian Wells is the alias used for her Seduction Cinema films. The Julian Wells name comes from the character in the book, Less Than Zero (novel), who was played by Robert Downey Jr. in the film of the same name. I actually worked with Suzy on a couple of those Seduction Cinema films and she remains a friend today. So I can assure you that's her real name. If I recall, her original stage name for the films was going to be Justine Time but I could be misremembering. Anyway, like I said, I'm sure you probably figured out that your initial thought was wrong but wanted to give you the information just in case. Be well! NJZombie (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- You're right! I saw my mistake after further reading, but didn't know how to Undo the entry, so I just deleted it. The IMDb entry was what really confused me, i.e. being under an alias, especially since the majority of her work is credited to her real name. I'm surprised her WP entry isn't fleshed out a little more, though. Most 'Living People' entries have a little more detail, such as Filmography, etc. I was tempted to add her DOB, but I realize many working actresses are sensitive about age, the business being what it is (unfairly judgemental). I would never want to do something that might impact her career. AS I found out in my fifties, Hollywood isn't the only place where ageism exists. I think she's gorgeous and funny, and wish her nothing but the best. Gil gosseyn (talk) 21:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 15
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tracy Coogan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Good Day. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editFebruary 2021
editHello, I'm Twassman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Hill (newspaper), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 09:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Courtesy notice - general sanctions apply for topics in modern American politics
edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editDisambiguation link notification for October 19
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cecily Strong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Scott.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Fixed the same day. Gil gosseyn (talk) 03:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)