Garam

You do not have the right to delete a template for deletion until you have proved on the Talk page that this state actually existed. Citing scientific evidence of the existence of this state.

You insulted me in a comment when canceled my edit. Which is also a violation of the rules of the project.

I ask you to refrain from even breaking the rules of the project or a complaint will be sent to your actions.Hatchiko (talk) 09:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Hatchiko: Hello. I suggest you read the template:Proposed deletion in first. The removal of template prod is not rules violation on Wikipedia. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 09:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

I see you already received a warning from the administration on another topic. You obviously create conflicts and serve as a ram in collective work. Breaking the socket-puppet rule.

I repeat once again - the rules of the project require the inclusion of information ONLY with reliable sources. This article has existed for more than two years, but no reliable source has been added. A link to another Korean wiki cannot be a valid source.

You do not have the right to remove the template, especially when the versions are rolled back until you reach a consensus on the talk page and have made new edits with reliable and weighty sources.

Articles of this quality are generally subject to rapid removal. But he went to a consensus and suggested either to submit reliable sources, or he would agree with the deletion.

You should learn the rules of the project.Hatchiko (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Hatchiko: First at all, do you see the message "If this template is removed, do not replace it." on Template:Proposed deletion? --Garam (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

i repeat you delete this template with violation of rule of wikipedia, and simple manipulate rules, ingnored the necesseary consensus and added reliable source, you simple revert edit without reliable source and discussion on talk page. Wiki is no fictional pedia and request sources. Hatchiko (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Hatchiko: I think you dosen't understand the template's explanation. Please read the Template:Proposed deletion again. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please read WP:BRD. Please discuss on the article talk page if needed.

@Wtmitchell: In first, please at the end of your comments type signature. I understand that all process on User talk:John B123#Special:diff/881758594 is one of Wikipedia:Consensus on Wikipedia. So, I think if somebody don't agree it, just join the discussion, instead of reverting. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A user talk page is not where you're supposed to have a discussion about it. Please move the conversation to the article talk page. Jusenkyoguide (talk) 08:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jusenkyoguide: I understand your point. But I think everyone can see the result of discussion about it now, because of I already linked the user talk page on edit summary. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Not really. The change will quickly be pushed off. It's probably going to annoy the user to have the conversation there, AND we want it open for all editors to contribute. If you want to make the proposal, please use the article's talk page. If nothing else, it'll be archived when consensus is reached. Jusenkyoguide (talk) 02:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Jusenkyoguide: Could you show me the policy on English Wikipedia about this rule, if you possible? Because I didn't see it on any Wikipedia. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Garam, sure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring#Handling_of_edit-warring_behaviors , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus#Through_discussion , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus#In_talk_pages , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#How_to_use_article_talk_pages all of which note that edit warning and achieving consensus is best handled on the article talk page. Look, the point is that no one is going to come over here or to another user's talk page when looking for reasons as to why something was changed. This is especially true on a very touchy article like Comfort Women. Please propose your change on the article talk page so that other editors can chime in. For the record, my objection is grammar and readability, not historical. Jusenkyoguide (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Aeni films by date, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PC78 (talk) 18:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Category:Kanto Massacre to Category:Massacres in Japan and
• Category:Gando Massacre to Category:Massacres in China Hugo999 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Public policy in South Korea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:59, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Law in South Korea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Public policy in South Korea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have nominated an article you created for deletion alongside other articles at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animalympics (soundtrack). Please join the discussion, thanks. 👨x🐱 (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Lady (album), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Lady (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Ryu clans indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Lunisolar calendar/number/1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Lunisolar calendar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:BTC lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:BTC style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 Template:BTC stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Busan Metro succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:2017 KBO League standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Our Republic (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 00:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:1995 manhwa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Korean clans by clan village has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. toobigtokale (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Infobox baseball season yearly has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Clans based in Cheorwon indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply