Alexander Roumega

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Amish way of life. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Amish. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Amish - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 11:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Amish, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Amish was changed by Alexander Roumega (u) (t) deleting 21027 characters on 2010-11-28T11:18:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 11:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Yav (Non-governmental Environmental Organization) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Fly by Night (talk) 00:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

A discussion has begun about whether the article Yav (Non-governmental Environmental Organization), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yav (Non-governmental Environmental Organization) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Fly by Night (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Yav organization.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:00, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I haven't been very active recently, but wanted to probe your brain about why the Beachy Amish page was moved to the subgroups page. To the best of my knowledge, and the empirical evidence I've been able to find, Beachy's are extremely reticent to be called Amish.

I think they need their own article again (but admittedly, it needs to be of higher quality than it was previously).

freeradster (talk | contribs) 20:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I agree. The only reasons for merging Beachy Amish Mennonite to Subgroups of Amish are small size and small number of sources. So I had saved redirect pages of Beachy Amish Mennonite and other Amish subgroups for future. If someone can expand it with higher quality information, it will be separate article again. Alexander Roumega (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Great article that you wrote about the Amish life in the modern world - I used some of the material from your article for an article on Modern conveniences.

Question for you: I see several citations for a Kraybill book from 2001 - but I'm not sure what book that might be. Here's a search that brought up several books. Could one of these be the book you referenced? I need it for a couple of references I have in the modern conveniences article. (I'll put this on my watchlist for the moment, so you can just respond here if you'd like).

Again, great and interesting article! Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks you too for your interest. But really I am not an author of main text of Amish life in the modern world, but I was only separator of it. Amish life in the modern world was divided from Amish due to Wikipedia page size recommendations. See version before split here.

As I see, "Kraybill (2001)" meaning Kraybill, Donald B. The riddle of Amish culture. (Revised ed.). JHU Press, 2001. 397 pages. ISBN 080186772X, 9780801867729. Alexander Roumega (talk) 09:10, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Excellent, thanks so much for finding that!--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate your efforts but please stop systematically changing article citation styles as you did at Mechanical filter. This is irritating to those who contribute to the article who are then forced to use a different style and there is no single approved citation style on Wikipedia. According to WP:CITE one should "...defer to the style used by the first major contributor" (bolding in original). SpinningSpark 06:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria Moravskaya may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• she had support of [[Zinaida Gippius]]. At 1911 Moravskaya began visiting “Literature Wednesdays” ({{lang|ru|Сре́ды}) by [[Vyacheslav Ivanovich Ivanov|Vyacheslav Ivanov]] and “Academy of Poem” ({{

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:25, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maria Moravskaya may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Polish]], [[Czech literature|Czech]] and [[Finnish literature|Finnish]] writers.<ref name="РГ" />). Then she made her own poems and [[essay]]s for magazine. Later her works was published in ''[[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am working on cleaning up the error tracking category, Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting. The above named article is in this category because of three cite errors in the References section. I am unable to determine the cause of the errors or the required correction. Can you look at these errors? Thank you. ‑‑Mandruss (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

• Translation of this page from Russian does not finished yet, and it's the cause of cite error. If a "name" (attribute) presents in ref block and it is not used in text above, that cause cite errors. When translation will be done and all <ref name="..." /> from Russian version will be copied to this page, cite errors will gone. Alexander Roumega (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 2015 Mount Everest earthquake, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=758ji_K8LO0.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:20, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of people who died climbing Mount Everest page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Matavath Purna.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matavath Purna.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alexander Roumega. When you changed Smith Rock from a redirect into a disambiguation page, you may not have been aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:

When creating disambiguation pages, fix all resulting mis-directed links.

Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "Smith Rock" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have links at the main namespace corrected. Alexander Roumega (talk) 16:37, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Raha Moharrak.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:05, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:DanielSueloFilmStew.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I noticed you are fluent in both Russian and English and was hoping you would join the Soviet Aviation Task Force and translate some of our missing articles into English. Many of the articles on the list are Heroes of the Soviet Union that have articles in many languages except English, and others on the list are major plane crashes that have yet to be articles on English Wiki. We also have many stubs that can easily be expanded through translation from Russian. I really hope you can join our task force and assist in translating. We really need some native Russian speakers at our task force, and you seem like a great candidate. Thank you, --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

It's interesting. May by my style of writing in English is not so good as in Russian and my Russian→English interpretation is not as English→Russian... But on technical topics it is not so vary important, isn't it? Alexander Roumega (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Megan Rice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Megan Rice.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Уважаемый Александр, похоже, что вот этот ваш комментарий стал результатом недоразумения. Вероятно, я не очень толково выразился про скриншот, извините. --109.252.73.45 (talk) 22:14, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Louisa Mary Gould.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Naib Uddin Ahmed Brave Shamed Woman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply