Ajf773

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ajf773. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Yashovardhan (talk) 11:07, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello Flame 1324 (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 15, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of bus routes in London, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 10:11, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 70, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cheviot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The correct order for sections at the end of an article is:

• See also
• References
• External links

Thanks. Schwede66 02:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

No problem, will continue as per that Ajf773 (talk) 02:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 44, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inglewood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Articles can be given a quality rating, and the lowest rank is stub. Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/Assessment is of relevance to WikiProject New Zealand. When the class of an article is 'stub' as recorded on its talk page, a tag can be added to the article page that puts it into one or more types of stub category. I've just reassessed Colombo Street from start class (i.e. the second lowest rating) to C class (the third lowest rating). If you ever get into rating articles, it's important to remove stub tags from the article when it gets rated as something better than stub class. Please ping me if you have questions. Schwede66 03:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi I have noticed with your recent edits to Top Ryde City and Birkenhead Point Outlet Centre you have removed a whole heading and paragraph containing useful information, please do not remove any of the information or else you could be blocked. Please ping me if you have questions. BugMenn(talk) 03:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have provided links to official TFL spider maps and the Abellio London website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawsj123 (talk • contribs) 20:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hold on. Are you sure that what you're doing is correct? Akld guy (talk) 07:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

• Let's discuss this first. I have only made edits to Ellerslie Railway Station and Puhinui Railway Station. My reasoning is due to the fact the services terminate at Papakura Railway Station ever since the full roll out of EMUs last year, with a diesel shuttle connecting Papakura to Pukekohe Railway Station. This is noted in in the most recent resources from AT. I'll hold off any edits or reverts for now until we can agree on something.(Ajf773 (talk) 07:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC))Reply

Specifically which of the EL rules do you think my revision contravened?Johnragla (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

• External links are best used as a third party source specifically relating to the article in question. As a matter of good faith I chose to undo the edit. The first reference regarding AADT was fine, but could be better used as referring to content. I have just added content to the article using the reference but instead referencing the AADT sheet 2011-2015 on the NZTA website rather than the historical list to make it less ambigious. The second link is just a url to a traffic delays page so WP:NOTGUIDE and the third was a reference to Facebook which is not a reliable source (but if the same content can be sourced elsewhere that may be acceptable). Ajf773 (talk) 05:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
• Still no answer on which EL rule I've broken. Neither can I find anything in What_Wikipedia_is_not#External_links, except it says EL shouldn't be of excessive length. Are 3 links excessive? The Facebook page gives the source - http://ndhadeliver.natlib.govt.nz/content-aggregator/getIEs?system=ilsdb&id=1081104. Are you saying that and the map are unreliable? If so, why?Johnragla (talk) 08:00, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Refer to WP:EL for external links. The quantity of external links should be limited a few that have significant connection to the article - I added the New Zealand Transport Agency as an example as this is the governing body that administers the highway. EL guidelines don't apply to links within citations. The content may be factual but the source itself is not reliable and social media sites and blogs are, more often than not, considered original research WP:NOR.
• I still don't understand why you say that the "content may be factual", when it's a map on the National Library website. Are you suggesting the National Library makes up maps which aren't factual? If so, what's your evidence?Johnragla (talk) 08:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • The original link you had supplied referred to facebook/social media. The second link refers to the National Library website. The difference here is where the content was sourced - the latter is reliable, the former is not. Ajf773 (talk) 08:33, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
• But the latter refers to the former, so at what point and how does it lose reliability? It's just that the Facebook link is easier for most people to follow, since the National Library website is structured in a way that requires 4 steps to reach the result shown on the Facebook link. I could include the Library reference and a long explanation of how to get to the relevant part. Is that what you're suggesting?Johnragla (talk) 08:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • It doesn't appear that way to me. Looks fine to use the source you just posted. When you cite links correctly it will display a title rather than the url WP:CITEHOW Ajf773 (talk) 08:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
• hope i've followed your instructions. still seems to me to be better as it was, but at least the link's there.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Zealand State Highway 62, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Main North Line. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have undone your revisions regarding Public transport in Hamilton and Waikato specifically the 'Bicycle ban' section which claims Hamilton has been the largest city not to carry bicycles on any of its public transport. No reference specifically verifying this statement has yet been cited. Multiple references relating to transport in other cities (Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch) are references to their own respective transport systems (but not those in Hamilton and Waikato). A reference to city populations from the New Zealand census does not state anything about bicycles on public transport. It is not immediately distinguishable to the reader and remains trivial and ambiguous.

If you can find a single source which clearly states that Hamilton has been the largest city not to carry bicycles on any of its public transport, then I'll be happy to allow it to remain. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article's talk page seems a more appropriate place to resolve Edit Wars, not continued use of the undo button.Johnragla (talk) 20:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have warned the above IP to stop making disruptive edits to New Zealand articles, in particular the changing of dates from dmy to mdy (the American format). I notice that you have also expressed dissatisfaction with the IP. See his Talk page for a recent warning by another editor. Akld guy (talk) 20:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

How can you make a reference and put a link on it? I left on the summary because I was hoping someone could do it for me. Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 13:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015Reply

Also here is the source http://allaboutcancun.com/about-cancun/travel-tips/faq/ Iamthemostwanted2015 (talk) 13:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Iamthemostwanted2015Reply

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_web has instructions on how to use the cite web template. If it were me, I'd lay it out like this:"All About Cancun - Frequently Asked Questions". Retrieved 12 July 2016. (see the edited code). This website appears to be exclusively for the Mexican state of Quintana Roo which may differ from the rest of Mexico (although the entire country has 18 as its MDA). Ajf773 (talk) 19:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am surprised that you made such a suggestion. Anyway, just letting you know that I have relayed why I believe they deserve to be separate articles on the talk page. Cheers. JaumeBG (talk) 11:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you previously contributed to a deletion discussion for London bus route 99, another similar deletion discussion is ongoing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53 which you may wish to give your input on.

Note: I've placed (or am in the process of placing) this notification on the talk page of anyone who took part in the original deletion discussion, as the most recent similar discussion, regardless of deletion preference, which is allowable under WP:CANVASS. The only exception being if that person has already contributed, or has indicated on their profile that they are inactive.

Thanks for your time. Jeni ^(talk) 10:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yo, thought I could explain better here. The last edits were very detailed on the features and venues, but were highly promotional. Since they're gone, I thought having that link there would interest people who were into that sort of stuff... like architecture and technology... like me... I do enjoy that page... I often don't even think to look at a page on Wikipedia unless it's hyperlinked... even if you think it's useless... :) E ribbon toner (talk) 10:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

• The article is self explanatory and the 'see also' heading to the generic article is unnecessary. A better way to format it would be as follows:

Event Cinemas have over fifty movie theatre venues around Australia, many located in large shopping centres. The cinema complexes comprise multiple screens.

Read WP:ALSO for the manual of style relating to the content.

I totally get it now, you're completely right! Thanks for this. :) E ribbon toner (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

http://deepwhale.com Appealing for volunteers, I'm trying to create the world's shopping and dining directory.

Go in, add a few directories. It will take just a few minutes.

Some of the Singapore shopping directories I've added: VivoCity: http://www.deepwhale.com/index.php/VivoCity,_Singapore Jurong Point: http://www.deepwhale.com/index.php/Jurong_Point_Shopping_Centre,_Singapore Ang Mo Kio Hub: http://www.deepwhale.com/index.php/Ang_Mo_Kio_Hub,_Singapore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinseah (talk • contribs) 12:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

Apologies for originally posting this in the wrong place. Thank you for your correction. I trust this is correct?

With respect to your recent reversion of my edit, I have added a section to Visa requirements for New Zealand citizens talk page.

Kwutchak (talk) 10:51, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I managed to get IP 27.252.145.37 blocked for a month at WP:ANI today. See here. Disruptive editing at Onehunga Branch, Pak'nSave, and others. I see you once warned him, so thought you might appreciate the good news. Akld guy (talk) 02:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

• Glad to have that nuisance IP blocked. Guessing it will only be a matter of time before they are back. Cheers for the heads up. Ajf773 (talk) 03:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for removing that duplicate reference at Phil Goff. It wasn't an oversight on my part BTW, it was due to an edit conflict and by coincidence we used the same reference. Akld guy (talk) 01:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

I didn't miss anything. I was editing at the same time as you but you posted first, so when I posted a few minutes later, there was an edit conflict. I reposted and found that by coincidence I had used the same Herald reference that you had. By then I was too distracted by other matters to edit out your cite. Akld guy (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Wadestown, New Zealand

added links pointing to Wellington College and Wellington High School

Bill Ralston

added a link pointing to Mike Lee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Ajf773! I notice your campaign against mention of retailers in Underwood, Queensland. However, if you look around, you will see it is common practice to mention retailers (and particularly notable restailers) in suburb articles (there's often not a lot else to say in them!). You keep saying that Wikipedia is not a retail directory; however, I am not aware of this as one of Wikipedia's policies. While WP:NOTDIR prohibits providing great detail, it does not prohibit mention. Listing their addresses, phone numbers and opening hours etc would be going too far, but I don't think saying something like:

Nowheresville has a Coles, a Kentucky Fried Chicken and a hot bread kitchen.

is a problem. If anything, it gives a pretty clear indication of the kind of place it is by the retailers active there.

The other thing to note is that this kind of content is often provided by new contributors in which case WP:NOBITE applies. We should always think twice before removing good faith content provided by new contributors.

I really don't see the harm in short lists of this kind of content, particularly in articles where there isn't a whole lot else to say about the place. Kerry (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kerry. I don't have any issue with mentioning retailers if there is a special claim to fame (and can be verified with third party sources) or a very limited inclusion criteria (such as anchors in a shopping centre) but mentioning a retailer in geographic area , just because it exists, isn't enough reason for inclusion in my opinion. Because of the changing nature of commercial activity in areas, content goes out of date fast, and such become a harvest for new and inexperienced users to keep adding content leading eventually to spam. Yes WP:NOTDIR covers this (and the policy is not exclusive to phone numbers and addresses) also potentially they can infringe WP:NOTADVERT, WP:NOTGUIDE, WP:NOTRAVEL. More notably the other more important matter is that there are often completely unsourced, as was also the case in this particular article.

I don't believe lists like this are commonplace in articles and I am observing more of an effort to clean these up rather than retain them. Ajf773 (talk) 04:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cheers re the edits on Micropub - the whole article needs a bit of a tidyup and I think some of it has been copied in from elsewhere. Crookesmoor (talk) 12:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The change you just undid in Places of worship in Bangalore was done by IP address = 157.49.164.149, not me. User:Pratyk321 (talk)

@Pratyk321. Correct. Sorry if you inferred differently but the edit by the IP was reverted back to the previous version which was your latest.Ajf773 (talk) 18:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Māori Television page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Class455 (talk) 23:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Please comment at this articles for deletion discussion. Thanks, 103.6.159.72 (talk) 10:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of businesses in Omaha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of businesses in Omaha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thryduulf (talk) 10:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am not really seeing why you removed material that had been present for several years. What makes the removed material "enrolment guidey"?

You have left it very difficult to understand what being split into houses means. Information on subjects offered is, for instance, present in AGS's article. Information on school blocks, whilst interesting, is perhaps extraneous whereas the rest is sort of critical to understanding the nature of the school.

Clearly, however, you are more familiar with Wikipedia editing than myself, which is why your changes, as yet, have not been undone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vonvorx (talk • contribs) 08:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Let me put it to you simply by saying Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a guide. We don't indiscriminant pages of content to school articles that has no encyclopedic value and serves more of a guide for enrolling students into the school. See WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:SCHOOLCRUFT. Ajf773 (talk) 07:51, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

You may find it helpful in future to avoid mistaking repeating assertions for answering questions. This is particularly discourteous when the questions include actual reasons.

In terms of schoolcruft, a crufty name btw, there is little sign of that either. There was the stuff about blocks but if you'll notice, I agreed this was extraneous. And the wifi. That can stay gone, I guess? But why does noting that the school offers standard subjects amount to cruftiness? If an article doesn't discuss, briefly, whether a school uses NCEA/IB/CIE I think we've absolutely failed to provide a description of the school. Similarly, it may make sense to you or I what a house is but this is not always going to be true (consider the NCEA talk page question about credits). Due to your unexplained decisions about what is enrolment guide-like (after years of edits, including by experienced Wikipedians) both of these important facets are now not present. So, I repeat why should this be the case? (Which means, specifically, what is it about these facets that makes them crufty?)

In truth, thanks to you, we should be renaming this article "Staff of Rosehill College" because there is more about the principals now than such basic things as whether or not the school has a uniform or not! In short, [citation needed] better described the majority of the problems (i.e. excluding blocks, wifi) rather than blanket removal. Unless, of course, there is some compellingly enrolment guidey character I did not see first time around and have not been assisted in seeing despite enquiring. (Unless, of course, we should go through presumably ever school article in NZ and remove information about their zones, which is obviously actually guidelike.)

Vonvorx (talk) 12:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

when i saw it was being moved to 'list of restaurant of australia', instead of reverting - I changed to 'list of resturants of australia', to fit my knowledge of english usage, so it is an unresolved mess - as the lead sentence refers to the original title which is more appropriate

JarrahTree 13:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

No problem. I had noticed the article had been renamed for some unknown reason so thanks for fixing it. Ajf773 (talk) 17:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I see you reverted my edit on the 51st New Zealand Parliament page with the comment that the change should wait until after the Mount Albert by-election. I stand by my original statement, however - Labour currently has only 31 seats as Mount Albert is vacant and held by no party. If a vote were to be called, Labour would only have 31 votes - not the 32 proportionality would entitle it to. If Labour wins the election, this (obviously) would revert to 32 seats. If this makes sense to you, I think my edit should be re-instated. What do you think? Cheers —tdltrombonator 11:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

• We didn't do the same when Phil Goff resigned and forced the Mount Roskill by-election, 2016 so I don't think it's necessary in this instance. Ajf773 (talk) 11:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Doing something one way one time doesn't mean it's best practice. As per the Parliament website, Labour only has 31 seats. For accuracy, I think we should update the article to reflect this, and amend it after the by-election is over for whichever party/candidate wins. —tdltrombonator 12:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ok then. Perhaps add a note pending the result of the by-election. Ajf773 (talk) 12:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reconsidering. I think that adding a note as you suggest pre-guesses the result of the by-election, so I won't be that explicit. —tdltrombonator 12:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, as fas as I can see the external links in the above article are neither excessive nor inappropriate, and they are in footnotes. What would you change? Cheers, Drahtlos (talk) 13:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

• Hi @Drahtlos. I suggest we deal to the external links by removing them all. Some may be suitable to be converted to a citation, others we should leave unlinked and develop a list inclusion criteria for the article to decide whether or not to include them long-term. Ajf773 (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

Regarding the difference between Clendon and Clendon Park, on the Auckland Council site, Google maps, and a map of Manukau & Howick Wards Post Codes, the area is referred to as Clendon Park. I am not finding official use of Clendon as the suburb. So, I reverted the version of Clendon to the redirect to Clendon Park. If I am missing something and you have sources that state that the official name is Clendon, though, please let me know.

By the way, I have added citations to the Clendon Park article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

• @CaroleHenson Appreciate this. The redirects for the Clendon article were from an IP user who has a high history of disruptive editing (across multiple IPs). Very seldom do they get it right. I am satisfied with your response and affirmation that the redirect is suitable. Ajf773 (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Youstruck out a comnent because the editor was trying to post two. Do you not think [[1]] is the same person as [[2]]? I have no evidence. Just that they both are for keeping it and the former has only on edit, suggesting an IP hopping. Although, I don't want to accuse wihout certainty. 2600:1:F18E:779D:2961:E106:9A9D:7391 (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

It has all the hallmarks of IP hopping which I have noted down to assist in the outcome of the AfD. Ajf773 (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. And concerning the article, the orginal creator [[3]] has been blocked indefinatly.

And the article really is questionable. Don't get me wrong. Blue's Clues was also a part of my childhood and I can understand why old fans should want such honors. However, Wikipedia is not for honoring third parties. I do feel Daniel was in the right and that few people second him so that he is forced to put up with the editors whose only obivious purpose for retaining the article is too honor the show, as is quite obivious from one ip's mention of the list of Dora videos (apparently a sign of understandable jealousy). So, in my opinion, Daniel's suggestions are in the right and should be followed redirecting or deleting the page. What do you think? 2600:1:F18E:779D:2961:E106:9A9D:7391 (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I support DanielRigal's reasons to nominate the article for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 18:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The concept of neoprohibitionism is that the government will implement seemingly non-prohibition alcohol regulations which have the side effect of reducing the demand for alcohol. In Mike Baird's case, the lockout laws placed severe regulations on the operations of bars in the city. The bars could not survive with such regulations, which was the real intent of the regulations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.200.3.66 (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your edits were reverted because they were not written from a neutral point of view. Please familiarise yourself with WP:NPOV instead of perpetrating pointless edit warring. Ajf773 (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have deprodded Gaisano Capital Kalibo, as it was prodded back in 2009 and is therefore permanently ineligible for another prod nomination. If you still wish to pursue deletion, please open an AfD discussion. Thanks, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:56, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I would like you to retrieve the page HOPES Diagnostic Laboratory so that i can improve the article to make it suitable according to wikipedia's rule book. Thank You. Muhammad Wamiq 20:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wamiq Husnain (talk • contribs)

• Hi @Muhammad Wamiq . You should visit Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion and make a request for undeletion or to userfy the content, I am unable to do so, cheers. Ajf773 (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cycling_in_Sydney. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Note, I have not removed your edits for now, but plan to do so soon. I created this page and have been maintaining it for 9 years. Being an active cyclist in Sydney, I feel I have a good understanding of what makes for appropriate citations in this topic and should be allowed to publish them . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teraplane (talk • contribs) 02:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

• This ridiculous warning was posted by an editor with less than 500 edits to their name, angry at me for reverting edits under the WP:NOT policy just because as they were the creator of Cycling in Sydney they believed they were entitled to add whatever they liked! Ajf773 (talk) 11:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
• It's worth reading through Talk:Cycling_in_Sydney to get a more complete version of what happened here. I accepted that many of the links were of a promotional nature. I noted this and was happy to for their removal. But there were other important links, form community based web sites (not for profits) where much of the info on this page was discussed further. While Ajf773 defined all these as WP:NOT, I pointed out they could also be classed as WP:ELMAYBE or several other acceptable categories. My main concern was that useful content were being removed without any discussion in the Talk page. From the above discussions, this has happened on several other pages. I suggest it's best to notify authors and maintainers who can then provide a wider context to the reason for specific links and other info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teraplane (talk • contribs) 01:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • I don't need to discuss in talk if I see external links that clearly don't belong in an article. Willing to consider them as cited references though. Ajf773 (talk) 06:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. No caps for "railway station"? Most other articles have caps. Akld guy (talk) 07:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

• Really? Does Hamilton railway station, New South Wales, Hamilton railway station, Victoria or Hamilton railway station (Ontario). Ajf773 (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • The vast majority of stations in Auckland and a few I've checked in the North Island have caps. You stated as reference that you were following NZ convention, not NSW, Vic, or Ontario. Akld guy (talk) 07:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • There's no mention of capitalisation in that article. Does it matter? Change it, I don't really care. Ajf773 (talk) 09:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks again for your contributions here. I've gone ahead with the merge/redirect. If you feel that the redirect page isn't warranted (and I'm inclined to agree that the subject's notability is questionable as a standalone 'thing'), then I'll open the RFD myself. Otherwise it's a 'cheap' solution. Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 23:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

• All good. Cheers. Ajf773 (talk) 02:10, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

please tell me. what is the problem in my wikipedia artical. P&M Hi-Tech City Centre Mall Bivash Maji (talk) 09:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

• The reasoning is explained in the edit summaries I made. Ajf773 (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Back in February 2017, you had flagged this article as having content that is written like an advertisement: Norwest Venture Partners

I have recently made edits to the page that hopefully correct the issue. Could you take a look and see if the issues are corrected, or if not, suggest (or make) any still-needed edits? And then, thank you for considering removing the flag if appropriate.

Thank you! Martyr2566 (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Austin Recently you removed a listing for software company Meta SaaS located in Austin, TX for non-notability. I discovered this company via an in depth article on Venture Beat https://venturebeat.com/2017/05/24/mark-cuban-leads-1-5-million-round-in-saas-management-tool-meta-saas/ and further found in depth articles on the Business Journal's web site. These articles do not appear to be self promotional or press releases. The standard for company or organizational notability seems to be met by the definitions laid out on Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies). I certainly do not want to get into a wikiargument but it appears that the company meets the criteria for notability and should be returned to the listing. Before I do that though I welcome your feedback as there are numerous other companies in the Austin area I intend to add. Chatterboxer (talk) 01:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

• The list criteria is for companies which have Wikipedia articles (blue-links). If it has an article it may be added. Ajf773 (talk) 08:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi I would like to ask for your help to retrieve an article you had tagged for deletion, Vista Land & Lifescapes. It is a publicly listed company and would rather have the article revised by the community to be compliant of the standards instead of being hastily deleted, as it was already there for a year and I have thought that it was okay. Thank you. Vortex Editor (talk) 08:03, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

• I'm not able to do that myself, but you can make a request for undeletion via here: Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Ajf773 (talk) 08:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! You recently expressed views on the AFD for Parabanks Shopping Centre that was closed with no consensus. I have renominated that article for deletion as someone who was not involved with the original AFD, and would like to invite you to express/re-express any views you may have. You can find the new AFD here   «l|Promethean|l»  (talk) 11:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I would like to know why you are undoing my bus fleet table that I have added to the Newcastle Transport page. I see you have never had any previous history on this page before and I would like to know what your reasoning is for undoing it. Is there an issue with it? If the issue is with pictures I'm working on it but I have worked on the Newcastle Transport page previously before without any troubles and if you think I'm a untrusted person then you have me wrong. I'm happy to provide information that I'm contributing the page and not adding fake or useless information. Finally I don't see any problem with adding a fleet table as I've seen plenty of other Bus company pages that have their fleet listed in a table. Please respond with a good reason as to why you are removing something I've spent the day working hard on as I don't find it fair my changes my changes are being reverted. Thanks Volgren User (talk) 10:25, 30th December 2017 (AEDT)

• @Volgren: I removed your edits because they appear to be original research. You provided a link to what appears to be a bus enthusiasts fansite, self published sources are not reliable sources. Furthermore, just because other articles include them doesn't automatically apply to others. Many of these other tables end up being removed as well. See WP:FANCRUFT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ajf773 (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of schools in Kollam district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paravur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Zilla Schools of Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zilla School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hwllo Ajf773! I'm Trevor, a product manager at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm investigating a bug report for a new feature we worked on, and I think you could help. Today you made this revert which triggered an edit summary notification. We want reverts to not trigger these notifications and are trying to track down what triggered this.

What tool did you use to perform this rollback? Twinkle, the tool on the history page? something else? Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated! Thank you. — Trevor Bolliger, WMF Product Manager (t) 22:27, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Afj773. I suspect Special:Diff/832474453 also pinged the user in the edit summary. Would you mind telling us what software you're using? We can see that it is updated to not ping anymore. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:30, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@TBolliger (WMF): @MusikAnimal:. Not using any software. Any rollbacks I do are restoring old revisions. Ajf773 (talk) 17:42, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

So are you manually typing in the edit summaries, "Reverted N edits to previous/last good version by..."? I see Special:Diff/832474453 is not tagged as Undo or Rollback, and you do not have the rollback right. If you are typing the summaries in manually, this is completely fine, but just note that [[User:Foo]] will ping User:Foo. You can avoid this by simply prefixing a colon, like [[:User:Foo]]. Cheers — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll try that from now on. Ajf773 (talk) 19:50, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you giving me a massage in my talk page. According to you I want to own the article List of programmes broadcast by Discovery Kids (India) as mine. But please listen, I do not want to do such. In the previous history of the page, you deleted the section of movies giving a summary that the page does not need the movies that has ever appeared. But they have appeared there with many repeats. And what would an encyclopedia help if most of information is not provided. Such as, if anyone want to find a movie on that channel he wil not find about it. So I reverted your edit. You can lend me if I have any misunderstanding or mistake. But please talk over the issue. User:AnkurHow ^(talk) 1:43 PM, 10 April 2018(UTC)

• The list of movies was removed because movies are not regular nor original programming on television networks. As you are the creator you should be aware anyone can edit the article and you should give constructive reasons for your edits, as I have done but you haven't. Ajf773 (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok Ajf773, I understood your words. Thank You

User:AnkurHow ^(talk) 1:29 AM, 11 April 2018(UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from The Moment (New Zealand TV series), which you proposed for deletion. While you nominatated the series for deletion under the 'Notability' criteria, the programme indeed meets these, as the programme was broadcast on a national broadcast network, owned by the national broadcaster TVNZ. The channel itself is one of the highest rating channels in the country, and the series was seen by a high percentage of the population. Local programming for New Zealand is important and is worthy of documentation.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Tvtalknew (talk) 11:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The List of YouTubers is being nominated for deletion again. I don't know why. It's been nominated so many damn times. Take a look here. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 00:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for concurring with me at Wikipedia: Articles for Deletion that having an article "List of bonsai on stamps" represents original research. Vorbee (talk) 19:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Would you suggest bundling all of these in an AfD?

• • Mossi states
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Gwiriko
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Liptako
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Tenkodogo
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Wogodogo
    • Rulers of the Mossi state of Yatenga
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Bilanga
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Bilayanga
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Bongandini
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Con
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Kuala
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Macakoali
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Nungu
    • Rulers of the Gurma Mossi state of Piela

Enigma^msg 19:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

• I agree, bundle the lot and nominate for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • That was brutal. I finally finished nominating everything. It took 15-20 minutes. Enigma^msg 20:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Last time I'll do an AfD bundle. Takes forever and it all for naught as they're going to be kept. Enigma^msg 04:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

You had voted in the deletion request for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of plants of The Edge Chronicles. You might be interested in other deletion requests on the same subject:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Edge Chronicles characters
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Galerider
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Ship,
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Pilot

--Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

You have participated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foods by calorie. Therefore, you might be interested in the following AFD involving lists of food Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of breakfast drinks (2nd nomination) --Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Schwede66 is now persistently deleting the disambiguation hatnote at the article above. Since you took part in the recent discussion, recommending disambiguation, you may wish to comment on the mattter on its [4] talkpage. Sweetpool50 (talk) 21:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about the revert, I forgot to clear up all the unsourced lists of buscruft; some of them are okay, but people just keep putting random ones in without noticing and it ends up with a giant jumble. Anyway, hopefully now it's trimmed to a reasonable size. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I created the above article today and already an editor has changed it to Panuku Development Auckland. What are your thoughts on restoring it to Panuku, as per WP:COMMONNAME? Akld guy (talk) 08:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

• I would assume that Panuku Regional Development is the formal name (according to Auckland Council sources) although I don't see Panuku being used in anywhere else so it could be acceptable for the article, at the very least a redirect. Ajf773 (talk) 08:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've decided to leave it as it is. The article is linked to by about 9 other articles, all of which already used the full name Panuku Development Auckland, and some changed from red links to blue automatically. It was a trivial matter to link the others rather than piping Panuku with the "|" character, so perhaps it simply is best as it is. I haven't looked but there should already be a redirect from Panuku because of the Move. Thanks for taking the time to reply. Akld guy (talk) 20:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yep, just confirmed that the redirect works. Akld guy (talk) 20:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for an engaging and respectful discussion. It is very much appreciated. YBG (talk) 07:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I did some looking around and found Category:Lists of churches in England, which has a number of articles with the same basis as the Lisburn list but with fleshed out tables and such about the churches. I'm of the opinion that these are still just directories with neither most of the contents nor the indiscriminate lists themselves being notable. Most of them were also created by the same user, so I don't believe there is a consensus for these sorts of lists to be there. Reywas92^Talk 21:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

you said those ware not serial numbers means, then what.? just go and see malayalam movies list 2018 or some other years. in one year we cant count, how much of movies released in tamil movies wikipedia list. thats why i added a serial numbers. kindly add serial numbers for the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VigneshVijayaRaj (talk • contribs) 18:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

• All other List of Tamil films of do not have these. They do no serve any purpose and are horrible to maintain. Please do not add them. Ajf773 (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

PLEASE KINDLY SEE THIS WIKIPEDIA PAGE. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Malayalam_films_of_2019 LIKE THIS I WANT SERIAL NUMBERS FOR THE LIST OF RELEASED MOVIES NUMBERS.

• Well, I don't. Discuss it on the relevant talk page if it is an issue. Ajf773 (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

You voted to delete this list during the AfD. I am now editing it and would like your opinion on how to make it better. Thanks Aurornisxui (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Delete all the red linked entries and separate whatever is left into geographical regions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

So is that the reason why all the past flavours got removed last year due to the new wiki guidlines ir something?

Like the new limited flavours. Or the new permament tropical sugar free flavour thats here to stay. And the perament iced coffee,mocha,chocolate thats part of the v family main flavours like blue and normal?

Sheld999 (talk) 04:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

please explain the reason you are continuosly and arbitrarly removing frrebird charter service from Malpensa Airport page

• It's a charter service, not generally accepted in the scope of WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT
• It's a future route using a holiday booking website as a reference - spam. Ajf773 (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Ajf773 :

• charters are widely included in airport pages, heavily listed in Malpensa page (and punctually updated), why this have to be different?
• Sources clearly states when and how this service will take place. I also gave multiple sources. The fact that they are "holiday booking websites" do not undervalue their effect and, for sure, are NOT spam.

Your arguments are INCONSISTENT. Evaluate to restore the edit (you can, of course, add additional and/or more meaningfull sources)

• To be consistent the rest of the charter flights should be removed. They are not routine services and should not be included. The Wikiproject group made this consensus.
• Holiday booking sites are spamlinks. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Ajf773 (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Ajf773 : The rest of the charter flights listed in Milan Malpensa airport are ALL PROPERLY, TIMELY and VERIFIEDLY referenced. It is NOT forbidden to list charters services as per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT unless they are private, ad-hoc (one per time) or irregular (and none of the prevoius is the case of freebird to Bodrum).

• I'm looking at some of those sources and they are questionable. Some of the links don't even work. Also do bear in mind that Wikipedia is not a directory and there is no obligation to even have these destination lists. It's a general consensus that routes which operate so sporadically should not be included. Same goes with future routes (ones that are not operational at the present time). Ajf773 (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

There are some possible typos in this [5] which I am not sure how to address. Probably best if you do so. "by proving detailed" and "perfectly find".SovalValtos (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Thanks, now fixed up. Note to self not to rush AfD's, they take time to do right! Ajf773 (talk) 03:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.116.57 (talk) 08:06, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Excuse me but who are you? Ajf773 (talk) 08:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, I've been here for 11 years without an account so it will remain that way. By the way accusations of sockpuppetry are considered disruptive. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.116.57 (talk) 08:40, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

• For someone who has only began editing using this IP since today, and only on airport articles, I will assume you to be a sockpuppet until proven otherwise. By the way, don't serve me with notices (such as ownership of articles) without any proof of any misbehaviour. Ajf773 (talk) 08:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

For the record, it's a dynamic IP[6], so any use prior to today would be more unexpected than otherwise, all things being equal (talk page watcher) ——SerialNumber54129 08:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I fixed the source and i put instead a link to Ryanair's official website. The winter schedule is already published and people can order a flight from Nuremberg to Tel Aviv.Friends147 (talk) 21:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

• A link to the official website isn't suitable enough. There needs a reference to the exact date to when the flight begins. Ajf773 (talk) 21:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

But it mentioned in the website!!!!! If people can order a flight it's reliable enough!Friends147 (talk) 21:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Refer to WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. This is the consensus on how we publish future destinations. Ajf773 (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
• "For future destinations, add: "(begins date service begins)" after the destination. Starting dates must be provided with full date including the year[5] and references should be provided" - I did the exact thing! A reference to the official website which you can book a flight is reliable enough. It shown that the first flight will start on October 28.Friends147 (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

• The official website does not provide the exact start date. If this has to be found using the airlines search engine then this is a violation of WP:SYNTH. If you can find a press release stating this, use that instead. Ajf773 (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Muhammad Humair (talk) 08:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Hey Ajf773 can you please tell me how to remove page deletion from my page Amir Khan (Pakistani Anchor/Analyst Person), Please help me and delete your petition of deletion for page i am new at wikipedia learning things so please help me. i added some of the reliable sources you can check in my citation i added more please check. ThanksReply

The AfD notice will remain for a duration of a week and administrators will decide whether or not to delete/keep it. If I were you, I'd write on the AfD page explaining that the subject is notable and provide those sources if they can be found. Ajf773 (talk) 08:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm know You Something Joke!--CartoonLover66 (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

You delete "ends" after the routes and you said that there is better source needed. You can check the dates in the timetable. There is never an info about ending routes, so to keep wikipedia on-time leave that. You know these routes are ending as shown in the timetale.

• How about you find a better source with definite end dates. No one should expect to have to trawl through timetables to verify content. Ajf773 (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure why you have classified RASHAYS addition to the List of Restaurants as spam and looking in my inbox, its flagged as inappropriate where you have hooters listed, even with a link to the website that has half naked women. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenslinks888 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sir, I requested to you not deleted shivram singh inter college this article based on a college. who famous in uttarpradesh or his information on newspaper name - amar ujjala , dainik jagaran. Sir you search for on google. Sir I say sorry, because I removed you tag you set in my article sir school is not a film or movies or cartoon who evidence for notablity but I am notable person my friends is Kumar ,Sanu ARIJIT SINGH ,but you is not notable who are you to says my school is not notable your are students not student of my school, in the many students come many states of Indian come and study in my school, you are not any information for study,what is study? you do not know I am a Indian playback singer, but you not buissness you make any article and I am deleted your article and you not know any information from your article. your are deleted my article but you have not feel guilty because you did not create any article .this article is not based on any person . ,.thanks you. (talk). 5:57 am, 14 April 2019.(UTC). Mayank123456 srivastava (User talk:Mayank123456 srivastava 06: 14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

• I don't really know who you are, or care for that matter. What I did what proposed your article for deletion, not actually delete it. Ajf773 (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sir, will you delete my article, Residential shivram singh inter college article please do not delete it. This article is based on a school which is very famous in Uttar Pradesh, if you believe, then search on Google if you yourself .so, thank you for publishing.Sir, you will delete my article after April 20 -thanks you User:Mayank123456 srivastava 1:47 ,14 April.

Hi, i just mentioned you and said I was pinging you for reply, within Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of night buses in London (3rd nomination). But i failed to include the ping. Please do see there. I do hope you don't mind my disagreeing with you in the AFD. I do believe we would have some common ground if we talked it out more, including that I also don't terribly like a list-article to be merely a slightly outdated copy of current info available somewhere else. About the AFD, though, I think the topic of "night buses in London" is big, culturally/historically/etc., and the AFD target is a combo. It needs editing but should be kept, IMHO. --Doncram (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Craigieburn,_Victoria&diff=880492603&oldid=880407512 "Not a guide" Excuse me? Showing local bus routes is a guide. Many other pages about towns also show information about their local bus routes. You should think again when deleting. Penguin2233 (talk) 08:22, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

• There was nothing wrong with my edit. See WP:NOTGUIDE. Ajf773 (talk) 11:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Evidently you feel you are superior to others based on your edit numbers. Problem is that even after 13,000 edits, you either were unaware of (or chose to ignore) BRD policy by trying to place the onus was on those who wanted to maintain the status quo to make the case, when really it was on you. And you may have gotten away with it until I noticed, sorry to disappoint.

I may have only made 74 edits, but the difference between you and me is that I only appear to edit articles that I have a reasonably good understanding of. You appear to have arrived, made some positive contributions adding text and and articles (albeit always uncited), but then run out of puff. Rather than saying my work is done and found something else to fill in the days, you have hung around, seemingly scouring the four corners of the earth for articles that you can delete text from, quite sad really.

That so many of your attempts to have articles deleted fail despite you fighting tooth and nail trying to try and discredit anybody else's point if they disagree with you like these, indicates you are not as knowledgeable as you would have us believe. You may yet prevail in this discussion, but unlikely to be on the basis of your attempts to discredit others. Ponyo98 (talk) 05:09, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

• For someone who claims they have done their homework, I'd like to inform you that my beginnings on Wikipedia are someone like you in your position now, who focused primarily on topics I had good understanding of, until I realised that you can't just add anything you like to Wikipedia due to the policies and guidelines. I too have had dozens of edits reverted by other users in my own attempts to improve an article, even with sources. I still have a very active presence in maintaining articles, you can find those easily among the 13,000+ edits I've made. I just tend to come across a lot of articles with problems in them (as well as full articles which are themselves problematic), and I come across a lot more editors who turn a blind eye to those problems. Ajf773 (talk) 09:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whangarei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kelvin Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi AJF773,

I noticed previously you deleted a edit about the future order of 787s. Stating that it is Not Crystal ball gazing scenario but many Current fleet pages on wiki do have a order section in them so thought it was strange that you came to this idea that they were not suppose to be listed.CHCBOY (talk) 09:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

• At the time of revert, the editor used a source that did not confirm the numbers of aircraft to join the fleet. That has now been resolved. Ajf773 (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh I see thanks for clarifying. CHCBOY (talk) 22:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 3 and Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 4 have Wikipedia articles, why Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 1 and Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 2 don’t have it? BamZ412(Talk) 11:55, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for being like this. I’ve only realised this when 1.02 editor redirected Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 3 and Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 4. I thanked him for doing this. Please forgive me. BamZ412(Talk) 13:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I only joined on 7 June 2019. Before that, I was an anonymous user with different IP addresses and earlier today I accidentally logged out and edited as an anonymous user until my mom which she asked my dad on FaceTime before helping me to log in again. I joined Wikimedia Commons 13 days ago in Singapore time. BamZ412(Talk) 13:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ajf773, I've fixed what you called a use of "Tourism Brochure language" in my edits on the Wikipedia entry for Wellington, although, personally, I couldn't see any difference. Look at the wikipedia page for San Fransisco, and you can see this employs much of the same language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leavepuckgackle1998 (talk • contribs) 10:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

• WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It sounds to me like that lead section needs some content culled as well. Ajf773 (talk) 09:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

My friend, I’m sorry to say, but you are sadly mistaken on how to pronounce this word. It is a Maori language word, and there is absolutely no excuse not to pronounce it correctly. It is also a blatantly racist statement to say there is a “Pākehā” or 'English" way of saying it, so if you ever have said that, please refrain from doing so ever again. Mispronunciation is harmful. It is lazy, shows no respect to the mana of the tangata whenua, and is misleading for people who mispronounce it, as they come to wikipedia to see how it is pronounced. You are responsible for misleading people. Now I have to put in citations to ensure my edit isn’t removed. Whether or not you are Maori is irrelevant; we must treat words of this language with respect. I know people who are Maori or can speak Maori fluently (or else have a high knowledge of tikanga) who, like me, are sick and tired of people like you preventing knowledge and letting racially motivated ignorance reign supreme. If you still don’t believe me, check out the below. https://maoridictionary.co.nz/search?idiom=&phrase=&proverb=&loan=&histLoanWords=&keywords=Kaukau — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leavepuckgackle1998 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

• I agree with getting pronunciation correct but not with the way you've handled it. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Zealand State Highway 23, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamilton City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Can you reply to me as soon as possible? Thanks. BamZ412(Talk) 13:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Any reason that you thought it productive to revert these edits, with an edit summary of "excessive addition of undue detail"? You thought the article wasn't up to scratch, hence you initiated a deletion discussion, yet despite the consensus being not to delete but improve the article, appear to be resisting attempts to fix. I have reinstated, can you please express your concerns via the talk page rather than just reverting again. Toweplus (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Kia ora Ajf,

My name is Freddie and I am a new wikipedia member. I am writting up the campaign pledges of our mayor, which I think is important to record given it is an local body election year for New Zealand.

To be clear the edits I did, showed no view merely the candidates pledges. Other candidates could of course put their own pledges on wikipedia too.

Please stop removing my edit please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.98.226.52 (talk) 08:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Firstly you could have responded to me using the account you made those edits with. Secondly, they were not only a point of view that was not neutral, they appeared promotional. Wikipedia isn't a soapbox, especially for any candidates in upcoming elections. I will revert them again if I feel that those edits still don't comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ajf773 (talk) 08:55, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Recently i checked the page and i see something wrong. THERE IS A FEW MALLS LISTED IN CALABARZON than other reigons. There are some malls that listed like CityMall and WalterMart but WHY you removed it in Calabarzon. I go to the edit history to see who removed it and it is YOU.

Can you please revert your edit that say that it is "not notable" but you removed some malls known here in CALABARZON.

Recently you had an edit war in that page saying that SM Seaside Cebu is the 3rd largest mall in the Philippines. Some say you are responsible for removing such important information and misleading people. So please hear other editors what they say and please dont underestimate them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.49.179.178 (talk) 01:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

• If those malls are notable (and have articles) then they can be listed otherwise they should not be. If a mall is the 3rd largest in the Philippines then it should be reliably sourced. I shall not be reverting any of my own edits. Ajf773 (talk) 02:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Civility

There is no need to swear, instead just write in simple words describing what your issue is

"what the fuck is this" is completely unacceptable language

I appreciate that you take the time to make (usually) constructive edits but it is extremely unhelpful if this is all the comment says , what the fuck is this ? . Your point may be valid but I have no idea

This was your edit on the Air Kiribati page ..... 09:43, 31 October 2019‎ Ajf773 talk contribs‎ 27,448 bytes -480‎ →‎Regional Airline Competition: what the fuck is this

Islandqueen1980 (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Point taken, however you still have a lot to learn about Wikipedia. A lot of the edits you have made to Air Kiribati since joining on October 29 are non compliant with the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia. Ajf773 (talk) 18:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Then your profanity is even more unacceptable, I am new to wikipedia (which I explain on my talk page) and you should be encouraging new editors not swearing at them , other editors are providing useful guidance which is highly appreciated and helping me find my way, you are not: this is evident with your counter comment " non compliant with the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia" which is extremely vague, other editors have given specific references e.g. Wikipedia:Civility for your profanity.

Wikipedia is a community and respect for all people is paramount.Islandqueen1980 (talk) 01:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air Kiribati, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Makin, Kuria and Tamana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I would like to inform you that the previous edits made to the page Mogappair have been made by a certain group of people or so called editors which is morally and ethically injustice to the residents of that locality. I was not engaged in an edit war with you. I was trying to provide the accurate data, with citations, which you do not accept. It is not my belief, it is the real facts provided about my town. Some people are trying to vandalise the history and etymology of my town and you are believing them to be true. I would also like to tell you that the residents of Mogappair have been upset about this. We all know that wikipedia is a place where all people share their ideas with proper factual data, but you are allowing the other vandalisers to play with this page, which disrespects the people of my town. Most of the editors from my locality and who know about my place are against your revert done to Mogappair.

I finally request you top stop reverting the entire data which is being presented, please understand the importance of our locality and its people. Do not threaten us. User:Vijaiya Raghavan(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

• First of all, don't edit my user page again as you did a few days ago. And secondly, with that edit directly me to the Mogappair edits which I removed them because they are not encyclopedic. I gave very clear reasons in the edit summary why they were reverted. You undid them without providing a good enough counterargument. You did not use the article talk page to discuss them with me or other editors. I couldn't care less if they are factual, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with specific policies and guidelines. It's not a platform to acknowledge the residents of your town. The next time you revert your changes, without further discussion, you will be reported for edit warring. Ajf773 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for cleaning that up, I wasn't sure what was and wasn't appropriate for transport routes. If you have an eye for this kind of thing, it looks like the content originated from the sockpuppet user outlined at User:TheSLEEVEmonkey/sandbox#East_London_sockpuppet_damage_restoration_project, so there's likely to be similar content on other east London articles that they've edited. --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Noticed your removal of my small addition. I'm very new to this but trying to get involved. You mentioned it was promotional. I'm not asking you to revert or complain but merely wish to learn. Was this the link to the Queenstown page? Would it have been better leaving out the link? Or was it mentioning a specific conference (I was going to add more but that's one I was working on elsewhere in WP)? Any feedback greatfully received. (This is my first Talk post too, so if I've done something wrong please let me know!) Jonwnz (talk) 20:56, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ajf773 (talk) need some help on a wiki page i am creating on Northlands Shopping Centre, there are 2 issues 1. Kiwi Property Group wiki page says it was setup in 1992 and acquired New Zealand Land Limited in 1994; which held a total portfolio of nine properties. but cant find any source to substantiate it, while creating the shopping centre page, can you help in getting any reference? 2. It is safe to deduce that Kiwi property setup in 1992 acquired the shopping centre from New Zealand Land Limited in 1994, so will it be proper to use this link ^[1] in history section since there are no other sources. please help and thanks in advance.Joydeep ghosh (talk) 07:29, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just a note on this edit, the information was added this edit. Since it wasn't present when the article passed GA, it should probably just be removed (it's not important to the station specifically) rather than just tagged, which I have now done. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:05, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear sir, Till yesterday my article about school was easily seen on Google or other search engine but today it disappeared. I am new here so I can't understand or may be little confused. I think the admin has deleted this or something else. And i also don't understand about https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q85794282 and https://en.everybodywiki.com/Pratical_high_school Please lead me and respond. Thank you sir. Sturdyankit (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This two pages I did has been deleted:List of the best positions of Spain in the Olympic Winter events Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the best positions of Spain in the Olympic Summer events and List of the best positions of Spain in the Olympic Summer events Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the best positions of Spain in the Olympic Winter events and I don't know why. I spent a lot of time doing it, searching and comparing results to make the list. The pages have sources and all in it was true. I dont undestand the deletion. Please, can you give me the reasons of the deletion? and if it's possible restore the pages.

• I nominated both articles for deletion, as you can see in the AfD discussions, the reasons for their nomination and subsequent deletion. I am not an administrator so I cannot restore them as drafts. Ajf773 (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear User : Ajf773

Good Morning , I See You Revert My Edit Back On , “Ninoy Aquino International Airport” Page , I Appreciate your Reason to revert my edit , But 1 Thing I Would Say that , Anyone CAN (and HAVE THE RIGHT) to edit and make ANY contributions to Wikipedia, as long as the Contributions will bring a Good Impact to the Quality of Wikipedia and Bring a Benefits to Users , so Please Just Let any Users edit any Pages while they have a valid and credible references , without feel under pressure, because Wikipedia is for everyone to Make A Good Contributions .

Sincerely User : Meandkancil2020. Meandkancil2020 (talk) 10:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I will not enter into an edit war with you. You answering revert of a revert is not how I would seek consensus. Two editors disagree. Consensus should come before reverting a revert.—¿philoserf? (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

A few of the ones you cut do have articles. Thus, even the reasoning you gave is not correct. —¿philoserf? (talk) 21:17, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, you recently voted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former members of JKT48, with a recommendation to merge that article into a different one, but the nominator then withdrew the AfD. Procedurally, that requires the AfD to be closed, but I agree with your reasoning. Therefore I have started the merger proposal process; please see the "Merger proposal" section at Talk:List of JKT48 members. Thanks. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I see you are updating links following the renaming of our state highways. I've made a template that could speed this up; this produces the abbreviated form of a state highway, e.g. "SH 1". We could make another one to achieve the longer version, e.g. "State Highway 1". Here's its first use. What do you think? Schwede66 21:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Hi Schwede66. I like it. We could have a function for both the long and abbreviated strings. Ajf773 (talk) 22:09, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Template:NZlSH produces the longer form; I've stuck a lower case "L" into the name. Let me know if there's a better name for this template. Schwede66 22:20, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

• I think the names should work ok. Ajf773 (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Care to elaborate a little more on what you mean? On the rare occasion I make a !keep vote, I add only those sources that I think are relevant, hardly a bombardment. Do you have a problem with my sourcing? Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

• @Cardiffbear88:, my response was for Andrew Davidson, not you. Apologies if you interpreted it otherwise. Ajf773 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Whoops, sorry, I was obviously over sensitive this morning! Apologies. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

• No worries, you're welcome. Ajf773 (talk) 09:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

As I commented on the deletion discussion, the acts' redirects (such as Ryan Lawrie, Acacia & Aaliyah, amongst the hundreds of others) must be taken care of. Upon the deletion going through, the landing page of the redirects, in my opinion, should be changed to the individual series articles. I'll be looking at you to take care of this task, as you nominated them for deletion? – DarkGlow (talk) 11:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

• I'm not going to be doing that. That's up to whoever wants to take on that task. Ajf773 (talk) 18:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Then I'll make sure to notify the admin that performs the deletion, if you can't be bothered to take responsibility for it. – DarkGlow (talk) 23:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why are the lists of X Factor finalists being deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamestlynch99 (talk • contribs) 23:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

• They were redirected per this AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The X Factor finalists (British series 1). Ajf773 (talk) 00:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, Ajf773! I'm Windyshadow32, a new member of the sadly inactive Wikiproject Shopping Centers. I am trying to revive this project to highlight the unique stories of malls across the country and the world especially as we lose more and more of them. Undoubtedly, we will lose shopping malls due to the challenges we face at this moment. Your account was listed as involved in the project, and I would like to know if you would like to help revive it! I can't take on this massive project without you! Please let me know if you'd be willing to help; I really appreciate it!

Windyshadow32 (talk) 07:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello—You participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show, season 21) which was closed as delete on 25 April 2020. A user re-created the article on 26 July 2020. The re-created article is identical to the article deleted 25 April and still does not address the WP guidelines in the AFD. I nominated the re-created article for deletion. Would you mind weighing in on the discussion? Thanks. AldezD (talk) 18:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

wikipedia:BUNDLE would have been much better for those storylines. If nobody has commented yet, maybe withdraw and start again. Schwede66 17:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

• @Schwede66:. Could you elaborate? Those were meant to be a bundle nomination. Ajf773 (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Silly me. So it is. Looked at it on my phone and thought they were all individual listings, with the "other" nominations added manually. But it's exactly the way it should be. Sorry for the inconvenience. Schwede66 04:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

• No worries. Ajf773 (talk) 10:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please clearly explain why it is irrelevant to indicate the political affiliation of the mayor of a city in the Wikipedia article of said city. This is common practice across many other Wikipedia articles about cities. Adding it provides consistency. --Spaastm (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Local elections are not conducted the same as national (general) elections in New Zealand. That's why we don't include political parties that local candidates stand (or stood) for in general elections. Ajf773 (talk) 01:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

You reverted my edit of distances of Agra from source:google maps. The supposed problem: original research, and travel guide content. For your information, check out the Geography section of Tiruchirappalli wiki page,here. Please notice the information about distances and note its source. And please do notice the Wikipedia class of said page. Then having done this, perhaps you may reconsider your decision to revert my edit.

Srinivas Devamsam is back. So you may wish to do another AFD. G11 speedy delete to abort the AFD would be inappropriate this time around. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Isde Bangladesh is a well established NGO and mostly work in the coxbazar district and also help Rohingya refugees. Please verify and check then delete this thing.at first you need to verify that.Hope you will review that and help me to create this page. I will provide every necessary thing.please help i tried but can't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by POTIMANCH (talk • contribs) 17:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Hello i'm 122.57.52.21 and i would like to welcome you to Wikipedia!

• The content you added was not only trivial, but it was unsourced, and is my right to revert your edit. Please don't try to school me on Wikipedia policy, especially as you have appear to have no understanding yourself. Ajf773 (talk) 07:34, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 122.57.52.21 (talk) 10:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

• What a dick. Tried to report me for edit warring when it was them who was engaging in edit warring to begin with. Ajf773 (talk) 07:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Would List of Lynx bus routes (Orlando) be a good candidate for deletion? One reference? Non-notable bus routes? Asher Heimermann (talk)

• I would say so. I might nominate it myself. Ajf773 (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Have you considered archiving your talk page. I found it difficult but a while back I was helped by this message from another editor. If you open my whole talk page for editing you will find the cluebot archive box code near the the top. If you copy and paste that, substituting your user name, it should do the job once the bot gets round to do it. My own equivalent is {{Archive box |{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis |archiveprefix=User talk:SovalValtos/Archives/ |format=Y/F |age=600 |index=yes |minarchthreads=5 |minkeepthreads=10 }} }} {{Archives|auto=yes|search=yes}}

I hope I am not being intrusive.SovalValtos (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

• @SovalValtos:. Not at all. I've had a wee go at setting it up myself. Hopefully what I've done will do the job. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

What the hell is this? You remove it!!!!!

Reverted 6 edits to previous version by 42.60.12.58. Unsourced

• It is what it is, added content wasn't source, was reverted back. Ajf773 (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 123. Thank you. Thryduulf (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Any reason why you delete the Fleet for MiWay? Mississauga transit fan (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

• Because (a), it is entirely unsourced and (b) because it is unencyclopedic fancruft. Ajf773 (talk) 08:44, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

RAWR!

Apologies for posting in the wrong place before, I'm still figuring out how to work this platform. Anyway, why did you revert my post on the Wellington page where I mentioned the city being the largest south of the 40th Parallel. You mentioned that the information was trivial, but surely this information is less trivial than the information right after stating that it has a temperate climate (which it shares with thousands of cities). Also, the Argentine city Comodoro Rivadavia's page mentions that it is the largest south of the 45th Parallel?

• The source provided made no mention that this is the largest city south of the 40th parallel. Therefore it is not a proof, but a synthesis. Ajf773 (talk) 11:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stop removing my edits, those edits are legitimate directly from the broadcasting television station and those shows had completed broadcasting. The other shows are schedule to broadcast, they can all be look up on here for verification: 1. https://www.mediaprimaomnia.my/offerings/media-prima-tv-network/tv3/ and 2. https://content.astro.com.my/channels/TV3-106

• None of your content is sourced and you have continued to violate the policy WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Ajf773 (talk) 11:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, are you sure about that? Did you even check Cartoonito wikipedia page? Because this is in the History section the word "The brand reenters the market later in late November 2021 via the Southeast Asian Cartoon Network, with an additional of this programming block on its streaming service HBO GO." I know Cartoonito might launch in 2022 in Latin America and Asia since it is written in the about page of the official Cartoonito YouTube Channel, and how is that unsourced? Please make sure to check twice because I believe that what are your doing might be considered vandalism. Please double check. Aspireph30 (talk) 05:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

• It is your job to source content that you add. See WP:CITEHOW. Ajf773 (talk) 08:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why did you undo my deletion of the second Timaru climate box?

The first box references NIWA data (NZ official climate agency). The second box (which I deleted) references "Climate-Data.org". They do not run stations in Timaru, or NZ for that matter. They base their data off climate modelling which is less accurate. Their data can be a good proxy if no official station is located in the area, but in this case it is. Therefore including both sets of data redundant at best and misleading at worst.

• You removed it but didn't offer an edit summary. It was unexplained and considered disruptive. Ajf773 (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

List of governors of California by age has also been included in the nomination with List of governors of Texas by age. OCNative (talk) 22:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

R u kidding you remove Cartoonito. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon_Network_(Asian_TV_channel) Drdanielf (talk) 01:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Do u think it's funny. Drdanielf (talk) 01:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

• Do you think it is acceptable to add content describing a future event and not providing any references? Just source it. Ajf773 (talk) 01:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people who died in traffic collisions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crescent City.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Apparently being blocked from editing a page even removes the thank function, so allow me to thank you personally for removing that stuff from the Convoy page. --Pokelova (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

• You're welcome. That's a shame about the block. I had been following the IP's edits from another article they were being equally disruptive from. Ajf773 (talk) 10:14, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yeah normally I would have let it go but with the scale of the edit I worried that the longer it was left the more potentially difficult it could be to reverse the damage. --Pokelova (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello - If that specific section is not for retiring MPs, then where would you put it for MPs retiring during the term? Maybe you could make another specific box? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConcordeAAIB (talk • contribs) 03:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@ConcordeAAIB: At 53rd New Zealand Parliament#Changes.-gadfium 04:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

State Highway 23 (New Zealand)

added a link pointing to Hamilton City

State Highway 26 (New Zealand)

added a link pointing to Hamilton City

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I noticed you seem to have an interest in List articles. There are many new lists created and you could help reviewing them specifically. MB 13:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Per Articles for deletion#Wikietiquette, you should not be closing AfDs in which you have an involvement. Only an editor who has had no involvement in the discussion can perform this. Bohnbeamer (talk) 03:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Bohnbeamer: (for someone with just five edits to their name) you should be aware that the AfD was created by me, and legitimately withdrawn. The outcome is leading to a redirect, and was supported by the article's author. Ajf773 (talk) 19:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I fear that very likely nobody will have cause to look into my talk page. For this reason this new attempt to contact you here, Ajf773.

Please read what I wrote on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mpa_swiss#I_need_advice_... Mpa swiss (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

=

Please kindly have a look, Ajf773 (or any other well-informed person who happens to stumble over this). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mpa_swiss. I am hoping for your helpful input ! --Mpa swiss (talk) 13:43, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Ajf773, how are you? Was just wondering if I could add those links, if I rewrote those articles? Roads4117 (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

• If they have articles, they can be linked. The articles still need to pass the notability requirements. Ajf773 (talk) 20:04, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Ok then, thanks for that :) Roads4117 (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I did make those edits, and I do have a few sources for most of these edits. 1739 is currently shown as active on the tracker on route 20: Rathburn. 1359, the XD60, since having caught fire was returned to service, was recently logged on the tracker on May 11, 2023 on route 42 Derry. The clarification of retired units for 2003, 05 D40LFs can be cited once I receive citeable materiel from one of my transit operator friends and a few other people who know the system well. Same goes for the clarification of in active service numbers for our new 2022 XDE40 and 60s. Miway.photos (talk) 14:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Would the CPTDB wiki also be a reliable source? The forum counterpart has a system where edits are to be made by trusted editors and suggestions for edits must be be accompanied by a source. Miway.photos (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

• CPTDB wiki is not a reliable source as it is entirely self published. Sources need to be independent. Ajf773 (talk) 06:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Okay sure. Can I still publish some of the edits about 1739 and 1359? Miway.photos (talk) 11:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC on the "Airlines and destinations" tables in airport articles. I saw that you participated in a discussion on a similar topic. Sunnya343 (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply