The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The person who donated $15 to democratic party was a 69 year old with the same name. The 21 year old who shot at Trump did not donate to the Democratic party. The shooter was a registered Republican. 107.161.193.56 (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is a false claim that began on Twitter/X. Please see this CBS News article on the matter. It addresses the false claim, and states: In fact, Federal Election Commission records show that the Bethel Park address on the $15 donation, earmarked to Progressive Turnout Project, is the same street address and ZIP code where the gunman lived.
Yeah, I tried getting it decreased too but they sent me to like three different places. Why would vandals care about Thomas Crooks? His assassination attempt was swept under the rug. 2D Is Better Than 3D (talk) 08:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
??? News outlets pretty much forgot the assassination attempt (ex. no new details), the feds were in on it, it was a massive secret service failure. What? Now they're trying to mess with me on other sites. 2D Is Better Than 3D (talk) 04:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I see that the comments made by the fbi of the assassin's supposed comments on social media are stated in the article - but I don't see anything in the article reporting that the head of Rumble came out afterwards and stated that they were the social media outlet being spoken of and that the fbi had lied about the contents of those posts.
Since neither the fbi or rumble has provided proof, should not the entire subject be removed or both included? 99.33.126.209 (talk) 01:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 days ago4 comments2 people in discussion
The article mentions several times that Trump was shot or hit in the ear directly by a bullet, with the only source being a news article the day of the attack. There is no direct evidence that Trump was struck by the bullet or a fragment. The origin of injury to his ear is pure speculation (debris, bullet fragment, struck by a tackling secret service member, etc.). It can simply be said that he was shot at and obtained an unspecified injury to his ear. 76.70.96.214 (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Many reliable sources say that Trump's ear was grazed by a bullet and no reliable source that I am aware of says that his ear was not grazed by a bullet. Unless you can furnish such sources, the wording will not be changed. Cullen328 (talk) 19:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
