This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article was copy edited by Corinne, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 25 May 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This article suffers by presenting myth / propaganda / gossip / legends as history. This is unencyclopedic and misinforms. If and where included, we must attribute it to the source, never use wikipedia voice. The article's quality also suffers by relying on questionable sources which are not WP:HISTRS. We should not mirror or summarize local Indian tabloids/blogs/newspapers for real history of this temple, given their poor record of fact checking, presenting mythology as history, paid news, propaganda and such issues. I have cleaned up this article a bit. A lot more clean up would be helpful. Please expand the section on the "temple" – the subject of this article, the architecture, the material of construction, the art, the inscriptions, etc. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The claimed links to the Puranas and Mahatmya are all strange. Show me one scholarly source to back it up, or cite the particular chapter of any published or verifiable Telugu or Sanskrit manuscript that mentions this temple. I am leaving it in for now per AGF. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
