Talk:Nana (2005 film)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 208.127.80.135 in topic Bot tag removal
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bot tag removal
editI have basically copied the info at Nana (manga) into a separate article. The link provided by the bot is most probably a copy of the Wikipedia article. Moreover, it includes the following mention: "The articles available here are licensed through the GNU Free Documentation License." For these reasons, I am removing the tag from the article. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I would suggest keeping both this entry and the Nana (manga) entry separate.Sakesakura (talk) 07:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Why? Per the MoS, no reason to have them separate - they are about the same work and not so significantly different that they cannot cover both topics. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 07:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- What gives? This is a live action film of perhaps the top female-oriented manga (visual novel) of all time. Last I checked, every single crappy american superhero film and tv series got its own page, so why not Nana?? If anything, the work's significance tops anything out of America since the original Wonder Woman. It's a girlie comic that hit it big, breaking out of its target audience age, gender, and language constraints to become one of the major international feminine media franchises of the 21st century. Don't believe me? Ex: searching "Nana OST" on a Russian social network yielded 2k results (none of these works ever commercially translated to Russian!). And that's just the soundtrack... Anime sites in any language with rankings consistently give the Nana anime and manga the #1 top ratings for the women's category, and place strongly among the top 100 anime and manga ever, regardless of theme and target audience. Considering the (openly tolerated foreign piracy-heavy, inclusive, merchandise-driven) distribution model for anime and related materials, this franchise most likely has in excess of ~100+ million viewership across the globe. If that doesn't warrant separate articles for different titles, then nothing short of Peter Jackson's LOTR films deserves articles at all. Sorry Lawrence of Arabia, sayounara Casablanca... That's simple maths, not personal opinion. 208.127.80.135 (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Music-themed... someone mention the music, please?
editConsidering the content and its significance, someone knowledgeable please write a bit about the soundtrack and its part in the film. 208.127.80.135 (talk) 19:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)