Talk:Myer

Just to let you know that the Bourke Street link is up and working (even though it is only a stub at present). EuropracBHIT 09:49, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Myer has been sold and no longer owned by Coles Myer (soon to be Coles Ltd.), anyone to adjust this? --Biggles 16:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

The transaction is not yet finalised, the article is correct at this point in time. Andypasto 05:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

This building is significant enough to have its own article. --Biatch 03:48, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The term "Myer Emporium" is ambiguous. While it was the name originally given to the Bourke Street store, it eventually became the trading name of the entire company and was thus used more widely. There are various references to Myer Emporium Limited eg. see [1]. Growing up in Adelaide in the 1960s, I recall the local Myer store being referred to as "Myer Emporium", later "Myer's". Murtoa 00:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion, we should not have an article on every single store. Only those stores with independent verifiable notability should have their own articles. --Elonka 04:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is the statement of the impending demise of the Coles Myer store card at Myer based on verifiable sources? Murtoa 04:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

This information is not encyclopaedic (in the case of staff discounts) or publicly verifiable (in the case of store profitability) and I believe should be deleted. Murtoa 22:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The very large section on returns policy has been taken directly from the Myer website, is unremarkable, overly detailed and is not encyclopedic content. I have therefore removed it. Murtoa 12:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Where do you guys get the info on store sizes? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tri400 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

It would have to be someone either from within the company, or employed by one of myer's landlords. But if its within myer, then they must be at least at management level to have access to that information. David52 11:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

... and on that basis alone I believe the store size information should be deleted, as it is not public information and cannot be verified. I believe this should apply similarly to the staff discount information. In my opinion, this article more generally is dominated by an excess of information that is either not particularly encyclopedic, or is obtainable only from inside the company Murtoa 12:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your suggestions but i was putting the question to the people who actually added the info on store sizes. Store size information is common in Indian media, particularly business publications. I haven't really seen such info in Australia, except for new and upcomming stores. So i was all the more curious. I doubt wether this is top secret info, as this type of info is published worldwide. Plus, when Real Estate companies sell or rent property, "carpet area" is printed in the ad. Tri400 11:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Store sizes info sources please: Could someone that uploaded the exact sizes of the stores in sq. m or sq. feet please tell us where you got the info. Even if that info was not from the internet. Tri400 00:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The move to condense the large brand listing section is welcome. The overall entry is quite bloated and I believe needs trimming, and the voluminous section on brands is a good place to start. I don't think this information particularly adds to a reader's understanding of Myer. Murtoa 07:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This section contains a great deal of unverified information, plus a great deal of unnotable information eg. the lingerie department sells... lingerie. Murtoa (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Myer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090112100439/http://www.accessmylibrary.com:80/coms2/summary_0286-725653_ITM to http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-725653_ITM
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071113025229/http://www.news.com.au:80/business/story/0,23636,22750002-31037,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,23636,22750002-31037,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

So where was the 2nd store? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.16.46.142 (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply