Talk:Madame LaQueer/GA1

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Averageuntitleduser in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 13:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Saving my spot for this! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 13:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Looking forward to resolving any concerns you may have. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Well-written

edit

Verifiable with no original research

edit

Most sources are reliable. Refs 2 and 7 are fine in their use as primary sources. WP:VG/S calls Screen Rant marginally reliable, but I'll allow it as it's not being used for controversial info. Earwig shows an absurdly low score of 6%. I've added a few more params to the sources, but otherwise:

Spot-check

edit

Broad in its coverage

edit

A short article, but the sources are often brief, so it does a nice job pulling them together.

Neutral

edit

Looks good on this front.

Stable

edit

No recent content disputes or edit wars.

Illustrated

edit

Images are correctly labeled as creative commons. They are both relevant to the topic.

Summary

edit

This article is so charming, it's something you really only see in short GANs. Just the variety, the images, the GoDaddy website. I love it! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 18:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Averageuntitleduser Thank you for reviewing! I believe I've addressed your concerns so far. I'll see if you add any other concerns based on the spot-check, or otherwise. I've got 6 or so similar bios for drag performers at GAN, if you're interested, otherwise thanks again for taking time to review! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Another Believer: Just that one Twitch sentence, and I think that's it! And I've got my eyes on those other bios, I'd be happy to give them a spin as well. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Averageuntitleduser   Done Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.