Talk:List of ranchos of California

The "Land Case No." serves as a reference. Readers can use the Land Case No. to go to the District Court documents to find further info on / verify the Rancho. Adding further references in the list will further slow it down - those references could be saved for individual rancho pages.Emargie (talk) 17:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Date" and "Granted by" are somewhat redundant, but there is some confusion in the records. Provided in the list are the "Date" and "Granted by" found in at least one reference. Some of these are clearly incompatible ("Date" doesn't match "Granted by") - but which was correct could not be determined by this editor. If "Granted by" could not be found it was left blank.Emargie (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I removed the following from the list: it's not in the Surveyor general's index. WCCasey (talk) 06:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

|Rancho Rio Seco de San Gabriel | 1845 | Pio Pico |Francisco Urbano Estrada |4,414 acres (18 km²) | 61 SD | San Gabriel-El Monte | Los Angeles County, California |-

I think the Rio Seco was forgotten, sometimes the surveyors never included every single rancho or rancheria in Southern California. There were pueblos and villas (villages) too small or distant to been examined and surveyed, such as the Rio Seco in the present-day town of Rosemead, California in the San Gabriel Valley. The rancho may been part of the Mission San Gabriel church jurisdiction, which included the town of the same name: San Gabriel and rumor has it there was a Rancho San Miguel perhaps the other name for Rio Seco. The two Archangels Gabriel and Michael were the two main archangels of the bible, so it became the predecessors of the "city of Angels" we all know of as Los Angeles. + 71.102.3.122 (talk) 03:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

The article Pueblo de Los Angeles begins with "El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles (the Town of Our Lady Queen of the Angels)". The name "Los Angeles" has nothing to do with Gabriel or Michael. WCCasey (talk) 02:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ranchos of California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928010732/http://consag.tij.uia.mx/ebooks/historia_baja/%5B28%5D%20%20Playas%20de%20Rosarito.%20XXIV.pdf to http://consag.tij.uia.mx/ebooks/historia_baja/%5B28%5D%20%20Playas%20de%20Rosarito.%20XXIV.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia article on Hesperia, California indicates the city began as the Spanish land grant "Rancho San Felipe, Las Flores y el Paso del Cajon". I can't find an authoritative reference to that Spanish land grant, or any mention elswhere on Wikipedia. The article does not reference a source. When I do a web search, most of the results appear to have been pulled from Wikipedia. If anyone out there has an authoritative source on the matter, then the Hesperia area land grant should be added to this list, and the source referenced in the Hesperia, California article. Otherwise, I'm wondering if the information should be removed. MissionInn.Jim (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Guillermo Castro got a minor grant of 600 vara in 1841 (62 acres), which was included in his big 6 square league grant October 25, 1843. The table correctly lists the case as ND29 and the size of the grant. The only error is the year of the grant, it should be 1843. 2600:1700:5FA0:5E60:35F1:BC4E:ADE:E4EF (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply