Talk:Linda Strawberry
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Linda Strawberry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
editCould someone more familiar with the subject please establish that she is indeed notable as a musical artist? Anyone can release an EP, but did it have any awards or impact on charts? Feather Jonah (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Last Name
editHer last name really is Rowberry. See this review of the last Smashing Pumpkins concert. Jesseoneill 18:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
With confirmation that Rowberry really is her last name, I set up Linda Rowberry to redirect to this article. It might be better to have the redirect go the other way.Jesseoneill 20:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Age
editShe is 26 years old. She was born on September 9, 1981. See Linda Strawberry.--EditorMonk 14:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Topless photo
editPresenting the history of her online activites, including her topless photo incident is not "vandalism" to the article, it is history. Stop trying to classify it as such, please.
- Please read the policy about the biographies of living people. Negative information from non-reliable sources, like forums, will be immediately removed. Shell babelfish 08:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Negative information alone about someone is not reason to remove it. In this case it is not unreliable sources as the incident in question can be verified with the owner of the forums.
- And I quote "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." This can be found if you bother to go to non-reliable sources as mentioned above. A forum does not represent a "published [source] with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" in the slightest sense. --EditorMonk 14:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)