This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:33, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
I suggest we carefully read Naming conventions before going ahead. There seems to be a few arguments against the move, as explained in these guidelines, such as
"Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature."
"Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists."
But personally I would not disagree with the move, since there seems to be also a river called "kokai". But the best would be to seek other opinions. --Edcolins08:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
