Talk:Hatlestad Slide

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hatlestad Slide article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Weather: Floods Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Floods task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Maintenance

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Working on article: I'm currently working with a word processor and notepad, gathering sources and revising the article. I ask, therefore, that you give me two days from now (to noon, June 16) to let me finish doing this and implementing the changes before making major edits. Thank you in advance, and sorry for any inconvenience caused - I realize this is an unorthodox request, but editing traffic seems to be very low. --Safe-Keeper 23:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Finished. --Safe-Keeper 03:18, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Hurricane Maria (2005)?

Latest comment: 17 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

That was clearly the cause for the slide. Also Nate was not a trigger since according to the NHC, the low that was Nate was near the Azores late on September 12 when it was absorbed by another non-tropical low (while Maria was near Iceland). It can be pretty hard to find all this information on the mid-season storms (after all the media was so focused on Katrina and rightfully so). CrazyC83 23:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's not a bad idea, considering that this is apparently how it's done with most hurricane/storm articles, right (detailing first the storm/hurricane and then the impact)? Would all of the article's content be retained in this case, or would some have to be cut? --Safe-Keeper 06:40, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

After some consideration on how to move the article, I think it may be a better idea to keep it as it is. There is content, such as the other damage from precipitation in Norway in 2005, that can very well be used in this article as it is, but which would probably need to be removed if the article is to be merged into Hurricane Maria. Or am I wrong? --Safe-Keeper 20:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

A blurb from this article could be added into the Maria article, with a link back to this page. You're right...the extraneous information including background info would be eliminated in a merge. Thegreatdr 19:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think the most relevant sections are The Hatlestad Slide and Fatalities and evacuation. The information of these two sections, in my view, have to be added to the Hurricane Maria article. In addition, I think Compensation of victims and municipalities should be in, as it is a fair damage assessment. Any others? --Safe-Keeper 23:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Psychiatric treatment sub-section?

Should a sub-section be added (directly after 'compensation of...') about psychiatric treatment offered to victims and the research project by Dyregrov, as described in Ingvild Telle's blog? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Safe-Keeper (talk • contribs)

Neutrality

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Any comments on neutrality (see ToDo list)? I feel like taking the tag down as there have been no complaints. --Safe-Keeper 00:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed tag. --Safe-Keeper 20:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Hatlestad Slide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic