Talk:Glasgow Women's Library

Glasgow women's library is a charity-based organisation. This article was not intended as advertising, simply to provide an online reference point. The page will be edited to conform with wikipedia pages on other public libraries Achilds88 (talk) 13:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The problem is the tone - the article reads like a press release for the organization. Wikipedia articles have to be written from a neutral point of view so judgements like "Glasgow Women's Library is the ideal resource for research", "An innovative Lifelong Learning Programme", "a safe and welcoming environment", "A large and unique collection of materials" are not allowed unless they are attributed to the person who believes them. Good luck rewriting the article, regards, скоморохъ 14:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

whether it stays or goes, I've renamed it "Glasgow Women's Library" (it was "Libreary"). Tonywalton ^Talk 14:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've declined to speedy- delete it, but it does need greater concision. And make sure that none of it is copied from their website. DGG (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am aware that there are some issues around the tone of this page, and am keen to get more up to date information about the Library on wikipedia. As an employee of the organisation I see this might be a conflict of interest for me to update so looking for anyone who would be willing to do so, and could provide references.

Laura Dolan (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ive tried to cut out some of the extra words that said the same thing several times. I have linked you to the Mitchel Library page. Do they mention you? Can someone tell me why your web site is copyright? Are you worried that Paisley council will open a mirror site and trick old ladies into using their site? Get rid of the copyright" You want people to use the stuff, so throw away 19th century legalities. They are just stopping you from achieving your role. Why has no newspaper or similar mentioned you? I bet they have .... we need that reference. At the moment the impression is that you are self justifying - show those 3rd party referrals. Do note that this is me volunteering. I am a supporter. Victuallers (talk) 21:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glasgow Women's Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110402002254/http://askscotland.org.uk/about.html to http://askscotland.org.uk/about.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply