Talk:Discovery, Inc.

Could you please log on to http://corporate.discovery.com and upload the new logo? AdamDeanHall (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't think this controversy is pertinent to an encyclopedia article about Discovery Communications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.4.141.92 (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

[1] here are the guidelines for notability. I'd make the case that it is notable. The issue has received press coverage from mainstream newspapers and trade mags (e.g. Playback magazine). And $1 million is not chump change. Glennchan (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm pretty sure that Hallmark Channel shouldn't be listed in this article.. they're not a Discovery network. Macnbc (talk) 16:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The company had also published Discovery Channel Magazine and it ceased publication recently. Anyone knows more about the magazine and please add some details to the article. --Quest for Truth (talk) 09:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I apologize to the editor(s) who wrote the section, especially if English is not their first language, but it is full of grammatical errors to the point of incomprehension. It needs some serious editing, but I am not even sure what it is trying to say, so I don't know where to begin. Steve Marethyu (talk) 02:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Most, if not all, of the Discovery Channel shows that Netflix had for streaming got removed a short bit ago. I've not been able to find a source for this, though (all I can find are things from 2011 about Netflix getting several Discovery shows). --Thunderbird8 (talk) 07:39, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

http://radiotoday.co.uk/2015/07/bauer-media-completes-acquisition-of-sbs-radio/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.147.19.2 (talk) 16:59, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Discovery Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071231175522/http://money.cnn.com:80/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-21647779.htm to http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-21647779.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

it has been a week or so that the channel 291 id has a serious problem, ALL PROGRAMS, including ALL THE COMMERCIALS,doesn't match, and other words, when any person specks and has like a delay, if someone from Discovery can check could understand want i am trying to explain. Vale92sm (talk) 02:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Discovery Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140816174114/http://discoverydn.com:80/about to http://discoverydn.com/about
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140818205000/http://corporate.discovery.com:80/brands/discovery-studios/ to http://corporate.discovery.com/brands/discovery-studios/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Discovery Communications. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://discoverydn.com/about
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://corporate.discovery.com/brands/discovery-studios/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA329062.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090101224341/http://corporate.discovery.com/brands/international/ to http://corporate.discovery.com/brands/international/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726211106/http://corporate.discovery.com/media/uploads/pdf/discovery-communications-complaint.pdf to http://corporate.discovery.com/media/uploads/pdf/discovery-communications-complaint.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022061855/http://www.groupe-tf1.fr/presse/communiques/groupe/2012/tf1-discovery-communication-21-decembre-7741344-843.html to http://www.groupe-tf1.fr/presse/communiques/groupe/2012/tf1-discovery-communication-21-decembre-7741344-843.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Wikipedians.

I suggest that the category page of Scripps Cable Networks must be merge to Discovery, Inc. on March 6, 2018. Ridwan97 (talk) 09:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I was told that Discovery inc. should consider merging with NBCUniversal, for Universal to compete against Disney, who owns National Geographic, and because of the time NBC had a Discovery Kids block. --ChowderRulez (talk) 14:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Starter pistols do not 'fire rounds', as such; they fire 'blanks', and are constructed such that they ONLY fire blanks; did anybody fact-check this? 72.251.15.178 (talk) 22:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I suggest that a new page be created, and it should include all the info about the merger between WarnerMedia and Discovery, Inc.. This page should be called Proposed acquisition of WarnerMedia by Discovery, Inc.. AdamDeanHall (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is not correct.

Discovery, Inc. did not go defunct. It was not directly involved in the 'merger', which was actually not a merger but a Reverse Morris Trust carried out via subsidiary organizations.

See https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1437107/000119312522028329/d249842ds4a.htm#stoc249842_187 (e.g. Explanatory note or other sections).

According to the document above, Discovery, Inc. (“Discovery”), was renamed Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.

It is still the same company, and there should be no separate article for 'Warner Bros. Discovery'. 62.122.200.65 (talk) 15:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• 230 Park Avenue South Street View-777x1036.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• 230 South Park Ave Building.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply