Talk:Chess title

The image Image:Kasparian.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I propose that the articles National Master and Chess master be merged into Chess title. They deal with essentially the same subject matter. In addition, the article needs to be "globalized". For example, the title "Expert" to refer to a player slightly below master strength is purely a USCF thing. The term "Expert" is not really used outside the US. MaxBrowne (talk) 14:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

More editors will give their opinion if you ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chess. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 02:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chess title. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090225073722/http://www.chess.ca:80/section_7.htm to http://www.chess.ca/section_7.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chess title. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315221010/http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp?level=B0101 to http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp?level=B0101
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430092221/http://fide.com:80/ratings/toplist.phtml to http://www.fide.com/ratings/toplist.phtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029215302/http://www.newzealandchess.co.nz:80/NZCFdocs/MP-active%20at%2031-1-13.pdf to http://newzealandchess.co.nz/NZCFdocs/MP-active%20at%2031-1-13.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply