Talk:Cheburashka

Чебурахнулся (Cheburahnulsya) is not a slang word (жаргон in Russian). It exists in all Soviet and Russian dictionaries of the Russian language, where it is marked in common parlance (просторечное in Russian). Cmapm 00:11, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• просторечное is not exactly "common parlance". It is "illiterate, vulgar, substandard parlance"; my closest English guess was slang (wrong, as I see it now). "Common parlance" is typically used as an oposition to precise technical terminology. A quote from wikipedia: The most common characteristic of all these plants—what in common parlance might be called a "flower"—is an inflorescence or flower head. Mikkalai 00:26, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

My Russian-English dictionary (50000 words,Moscow, "Russkij yazyk",1981) translates просторечное as "in common parlance" while жаргон is translated as "jargon or slang". Could you point sources, which approve your guess exactly? Cmapm 00:55, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If you want more new one - my Modern English-Russian Dictionary (Moscow, Russky Yazyk, 1994) translates in common parlance as в просторечии. Cmapm 01:01, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

просторечие ; language of the (uneducated) people; vernacular, colloquial, common/popular language. Mikkalai 03:42, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

It's much closer, although the following citation from Wiki, leaves certain doubts:Colloquialisms are often used primarily within a limited geographical area. Because in Russian language dictionary (I tried to translate a definition from it into English) просторечие defined as:Words and grammatical forms of mass urban colloquial speech, used in literary language as stylistical means of attaching a jocular,slighting, ironical etc. shade to speech. I think, that mass urban colloquial speech is more general, than within a limited geographical area. Cmapm 14:25, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No, it's still "in common parlance".Although there is no such term in Wiki yet), you can find plenty times of its usage (to describe mostly non-technical terms) searching with Google in the UK websites [1].

the word "technical" denotes not only "technology and engineering"; people say "technically correct" in the meaning of "formal, strict". Mikkalai 19:12, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

In Russian dictionaries разговорное is used instead of просторечное to describe words of colloquial speech (namely it is translated as such to English by above mentioned dictionaries). I also don't know, what makes you think, that it is "illiterate, vulgar, substandard parlance" term, contrary to dictionary definitions. Vulgar terms in Soviet books for children? Do you really believe in this? Cmapm 15:10, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Well, I'm not going to do scientific research and will not revert any more (not only because of WP:3RR) this minor change. But I think, that even if you find more arguments, the contrary arguments from the above dictionaries exist. That's why the only compromise, which I should accept (if asked to do so) in the case you exactly point out contrary sources, is just to say:"cheburahnulsya" in Russian - letting readers to find out themselves, to which category it should be placed. Cmapm 16:00, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Colloquialism is an exact term here. Quoting: A colloquialism is an informal expression, that is, an expression not used in formal speech or writing. Are you claiming that "cheburakhnulsa" is an expression used in formal speech? In is an informal word, like "zagremel", "shlyopnulsa", "skovyrnulsya", and many others of the kind. Mikkalai 18:53, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"ЧЕБУРАХНУТЬСЯ сов. разг.-сниж. 1. Упасть с силой." Notice "сниж.", meaning "lower standard of speech". What is more, the word was obsolete. Uspensky revived it, but it is still not mainstream. It is way far from "common parlance". Mikkalai 18:59, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Also "he" is used throughout all the story in Cheburashka's address, so all "it" items in the article changed to "he" by myself. Cmapm 00:16, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Are any of the recordings from the movies protected by copyright? It would be pretty neat to have them at Commons.

Peter ^Isotalo 21:51, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)

There are some very contentious issues surrounding the copyrights to these movies. It is very unclear who owns them and so it would definately not be possible to put them in Commons. Konky2000 05:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Чебурахнулся its Russian "легкий слэнг". I am a Russian man and i know what i say/

The sound file is not correct. It speaks only to the middle of words: Чебураш. No sound "ка". I'm Russian too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.202.44.35 (talk) 20:16, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Um, actually this link is pretty interesting. Does anyone have any info on the background of those images? From the signature, they seem to all be made by one artist. Esn 08:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Krokodil gena.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Druttenochgena.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cheburashka. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.figureskatersonline.com/johnnyweir/interact12.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheburashka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060625022757/http://context.themoscowtimes.com:80/stories/2006/05/12/101.html to http://context.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2006/05/12/101.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cheburashka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110512105252/http://media.fwinc.jp/english/ to http://media.fwinc.jp/english/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://context.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2006/05/12/101.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Cheburashka (4435440491).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Cheburashka is hardly seen on the images, overshadowed by the crocodile. Image with cheburashka only would be better, like this one^[1] from the Russian Wikipedia. --Maxaxa (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)I would replace but all my files get deleted.Reply

Якщо любиш Чебурашку - Їдь на свою рашку! 212.35.164.13 (talk) 14:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply