 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 | CSS Manassas (clipper) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 January 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into CSS Manassas. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Assessment
editThis article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as start-class based on its WP:MILHIST assessment. HausTalk 23:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Found by National Underwater and Marine Agency?
editThe Clive Cussler article states that The Manassas was found by NUMA. Perhaps if someone can find a reliable reference this article can be expanded to include this information. OlEnglish (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Incorrect image
editThe image of Manassas that is used in the article is incorrect. Manassas had two stacks, not one. Hearn (Capture of New Orleans, 1862, p. 68.) emphasizes this point. I would put in a different image, but the only correct one I have seen is subject to copyright restrictions. Perhaps someone else can find (or create) a better picture. PKKloeppel (talk) 12:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Tone
editIt is interesting to read the description of this ship vs. the description of the USS Mississippi and George Dewey's wiki entry. The engagement between the Manassas and the Mississippi seems to be somewhat different in tone and different points of view depending on which ship you are reading about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.215.84 (talk) 14:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)