Talk:Battle of Iwo Jima

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Cinderella157 in topic Tank losses in infobox
Former good article nomineeBattle of Iwo Jima was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 14, 2006WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
April 25, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Number of prisoners

edit

The Infobox gives 216 but several sources report 1,083 taken prisoner:

https://books.google.it/books?id=LekfM0iFchEC&pg=PA105&lpg=PA105&dq=iwo+jima+1083+prisoners&source=bl&ots=DwN9BRdfbS&sig=ACfU3U0rt1DF1-A65JK4_HqwwmZTWqUaIg&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi1tvm-jtz2AhUPQ_EDHTduDq0Q6AF6BAgfEAM#v=onepage&q=iwo%20jima%201083%20prisoners&f=false

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2004/06/sulfur-island/305332/

https://books.google.it/books?id=qOEu4ALwR-IC&pg=PA232&lpg=PA232&dq=iwo+jima+1083+prisoners&source=bl&ots=sluHwb4GRh&sig=ACfU3U2am-JwEmqkCQ115RGqzpTRvPHD8Q&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmh7iDj9z2AhUWRPEDHeMUCvAQ6AF6BAgdEAM#v=onepage&q=iwo%20jima%201083%20prisoners&f=false

https://books.google.it/books?id=ghjWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT85&lpg=PT85&dq=iwo+jima+1083+prisoners&source=bl&ots=PFNFxGdsmC&sig=ACfU3U3tx7rOMJKJXnULvGwGRn9oMY9rCg&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmh7iDj9z2AhUWRPEDHeMUCvAQ6AF6BAgeEAM#v=onepage&q=iwo%20jima%201083%20prisoners&f=false

https://books.google.it/books?id=FnZqVTuDMGsC&pg=RA2-PA91&lpg=RA2-PA91&dq=iwo+jima+1083+prisoners&source=bl&ots=2Ms0vv2v9h&sig=ACfU3U2PZSr3Rab9izdP0yHkS6fyeMYXmg&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmh7iDj9z2AhUWRPEDHeMUCvAQ6AF6BAgbEAM#v=onepage&q=iwo%20jima%201083%20prisoners&f=false

https://books.google.it/books?id=rAKmUiGeTyoC&pg=RA1-PA91&lpg=RA1-PA91&dq=iwo+jima+1083+prisoners&source=bl&ots=C-aNkti8nM&sig=ACfU3U3CmDKeWdxfqkDJFIeBxh0bNmWeSQ&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmh7iDj9z2AhUWRPEDHeMUCvAQ6AF6BAgcEAM#v=onepage&q=iwo%20jima%201083%20prisoners&f=false

--195.225.41.202 (talk) 11:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Names of holdouts

edit

The Pacific Stars and Stripes article was initial reporting that may have gotten some names inaccurately. https://www.marines.mil/portals/1/Publications/A%20Brief%20History%20of%20the%2025th%20Marines%20%20PCN%2019000308300.pdf states "Kofuku Yamakage" which matches the Japanese characters which presumably come from the Japanese source. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lots of Pictures

edit

There are a lot of pictures in a few sections of this article. I think a Gallery section should be created and most of the photos moved there. If not, then perhaps moving each picture to a relevant part of the section instead of having them stacked on top of each other. Isz Chepewéssin (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The purpose of images are to support related text. They should be placed relative to the text they support. They are not intended for decoration, including galleries. Excessive images not fulfilling this function should be removed. Cinderella157 (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Then what about moving the picture to different points in the sections? A a few of the pictures in the First Day section show points in the battle that take place later on the first day, yet they're all listed at the top? Isz Chepewéssin (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Moving to a section where they better serve their purpose is fine. Cinderella157 (talk) 05:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tank losses in infobox

edit

Sormando, per WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE, the infobox is for key facts from the article (ie it should reflect content in the body of the article). It is certainly not a repository for every factoid. We are also told that less is better when it comes to infoboxes. You have added tank losses and when reverted, reinstated the losses without establishing consensus per WP:ONUS and WP:BRD. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply