Talk:3 May Constitution Day

In Anglophone countries such as the United States, the equivalent of the Polish "święto" is not "holiday" but simply "day" — e.g., "New Year's Day," "Martin Luther King Day," "Memorial Day," "Independence Day," "Labor Day," "Veterans Day," "Thanksgiving Day," "Christmas Day."

Thus the English equivalent of "Święto Konstytucji 3 Maja" would be "May 3rd Constitution Day."

"May 3 National Holiday," by comparison, is opaque in the extreme.

English-language equivalents of foreign terms are often paraphrastic rather than metaphrastic. Example: "Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów" is rendered in Wikipedia not literally (metaphrastically) as "Republic of the Two Nations" but descriptively (paraphrastically) as "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth." Nihil novi (talk) 08:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, that seems convincing, so I moved the article to May 3rd Constitution Day.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

A very interesting article. I have a few comments and suggestions.

Infobox

• The caption should say "the Constitution", not just "Constitution"

Background

• Consider moving note [a] before the numbered footnotes
• Consider adding 2010 to the photo caption

Celebrations

• "this day, free from work": Is Constitution Day a paid holiday? Please clarify
• List of dignitaries: consider using semi-colons to clarify (title, name; title, name; etc.)
• "known as Polish Constitution Day": Try to clarify. Consider "The holiday has been a focal point of ethnic celebrations of Polish-American pride in the Chicago area, where it is known as Polish Constitution Day, since 1892."
• "prominent guests nationwide": consider "guests of national stature"
• "lobby": consider "ingratiate themselves with"
• Kennedy doesn't seem to be mentioned in the sources
• In general, the sources for the last paragraph are not of the same quality as the rest of the article
• Consider adding 2007 to the photo caption

— Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the review, most issues done. Kennedy is mentioned in this ref: [1]. And yes, the sources for Polish-American issues are poor; I am however not seeing anything better. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on May 3rd Constitution Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327162022/http://www.partydigest.com/news_detail.php?nid=514&city_id=18 to http://www.partydigest.com/news_detail.php?nid=514&city_id=18
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327120124/http://www.kielce.ap.gov.pl/najciekawsze/trzeci_maj.pdf to http://www.kielce.ap.gov.pl/najciekawsze/trzeci_maj.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply