Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 5, 2018

Shape sensitivity analysis for identification of voids under Navier’s boundary conditions in linear elasticity

  • Bochra Méjri ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

This work is devoted to the study of the void identification problem from partially overdetermined boundary data in the 2D-elastostatic case. In a first part, a shape identifiability result from a Cauchy data is presented, i.e. with traction field and boundary displacement as measurements. Then this geometric inverse problem is tackled by the minimization of two cost functionals, an energy gap functional and an L2-gap functional, which enable the reconstruction of voids under Navier’s boundary conditions. The shape derivatives of these cost functionals are computed for the purpose of sensitivity analysis.

MSC 2010: 35R30; 74B05; 49Q12

Funding statement: This work was supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Pr. Amel Ben Abda for numerous discussions on the subject of this article.

References

[1] G. Allaire, F. de Gournay, F. Jouve and A.-M. Toader, Structural optimization using topological and shape sensitivity via a level set method, Control Cybernet. 34 (2005), no. 1, 59–80. Search in Google Scholar

[2] H. B. Ameur, M. Burger and B. Hackl, Cavity identification in linear elasticity and thermoelasticity, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 30 (2007), no. 6, 625–647. 10.1002/mma.772Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. Ben Abda, E. Jaïem, S. Khalfallah and B. Méjri, Voids identification from partially overspecified boundary data, New Trends Math. Sci., to appear. Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Ben Abda, E. Jaïem, S. Khalfallah and A. Zine, An energy gap functional: Cavity identification in linear elasticity, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 25 (2017), no. 5, 573–595. 10.1515/jiip-2016-0067Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Bonnet, Topological sensitivity of energy cost functional for wave-based defect identification, C. R. Mecanique 338 (2010), 377–389. 10.1016/j.crme.2010.07.016Search in Google Scholar

[6] F. Bouchon, G. H. Peichl, M. Sayeh and R. Touzani, A free boundary problem for the Stokes equations, ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 23 (2017), no. 1, 195–215. 10.1051/cocv/2015045Search in Google Scholar

[7] F. Brezzi, On the existence, uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from Lagrangian multipliers, Rev. Franc. Automat. Inform. Rech. Operat. R 8 (1974), no. R-2, 129–151. 10.1051/m2an/197408R201291Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. Caubet, M. Dambrine, D. Kateb and C. Z. Timimoun, A Kohn–Vogelius formulation to detect an obstacle immersed in a fluid, preprint (2012), https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00678036. 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.123Search in Google Scholar

[9] P. Destuynder and M. Djaoua, Sur une interprétation mathématique de l’intégrale de Rice en théorie de la rupture fragile, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 3 (1981), no. 1, 70–87. 10.1002/mma.1670030106Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Garreau, P. Guillaume and M. Masmoudi, The topological asymptotic for PDE systems: The elasticity case, SIAM J. Control Optim. 39 (2001), no. 6, 1756–1778. 10.1137/S0363012900369538Search in Google Scholar

[11] S.-C. Hsieh and T. Mura, Nondestructive cavity identification in structures, Internat. J. Solids Structures 30 (1993), no. 12, 1579–1587. 10.1016/0020-7683(93)90191-9Search in Google Scholar

[12] E. Jaïem, Shape derivative of an energy error functional for voids detection from sub-Cauchy data, Electron. J. Differential Equations 2016 (2016), Paper No. 265. Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Kohn and M. Vogelius, Determining conductivity by boundary measurements, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (1984), no. 3, 289–298. 10.1002/cpa.3160370302Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. V. Kohn and M. Vogelius, Relaxation of a variational method for impedance computed tomography, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 40 (1987), no. 6, 745–777. 10.1002/cpa.3160400605Search in Google Scholar

[15] S. Kubo, Inverse problems related to the mechanics and fracture of solids and structures, JSME Int. J. 31 (1988), no. 2, 157–166. 10.1299/jsmea1988.31.2_157Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Meftahi and J.-P. Zolésio, Sensitivity analysis for some inverse problems in linear elasticity via minimax differentiability, Appl. Math. Model. 39 (2015), no. 5–6, 1554–1576. 10.1016/j.apm.2014.09.026Search in Google Scholar

[17] N. I. Muskhelishvili, Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Noordhoff International, Leiden, 1977. 10.1007/978-94-017-3034-1Search in Google Scholar

[18] J. Nečas and I. Hlaváček, Mathematical Theory of Elastic and Elasto-plastic Bodies: An Introduction, Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, 1980. Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. A. Novotny, R. A. Feijóo, E. Taroco and C. Padra, Topological sensitivity analysis for three-dimensional linear elasticity problem, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196 (2007), no. 41–44, 4354–4364. 10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.006Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Sokoł owski and A. Żochowski, On the topological derivative in shape optimization, SIAM J. Control Optim. 37 (1999), no. 4, 1251–1272. 10.1137/S0363012997323230Search in Google Scholar

[21] J. Sokoł owski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimization. Shape Sensitivity Analysis, Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 16, Springer, Berlin, 1992. 10.1007/978-3-642-58106-9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-04-09
Revised: 2018-09-24
Accepted: 2018-11-10
Published Online: 2018-12-05
Published in Print: 2019-06-01

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.10.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jiip-2018-0029/html
Scroll to top button