Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 22, 2022

The Lie algebra structure of the degree one Hochschild cohomology of the blocks of the sporadic Mathieu groups

  • William Murphy
From the journal Journal of Group Theory

Abstract

Let 𝐺 be one of the sporadic simple Mathieu groups M 11 , M 12 , M 22 , M 23 or M 24 , and suppose 𝑘 is an algebraically closed field of prime characteristic 𝑝, dividing the order of 𝐺. In this paper, we describe some of the Lie algebra structure of the first Hochschild cohomology groups of the 𝑝-blocks of k G . In particular, we calculate the dimension of HH 1 ( B ) for the 𝑝-blocks 𝐵 of k G , and in almost all cases, we determine whether HH 1 ( B ) is a solvable Lie algebra.

A The dimension of the first Hochschild cohomology group of a finite group algebra

Using the following result, we are able to construct a simple GAP code to find the dimensions of the degree one Hochschild cohomology of a group algebra, coming from the centraliser decomposition.

Lemma A.1

The 𝑘-vector space Hom ( G , k ) is non-zero if and only if 𝐺 has a quotient isomorphic to a non-trivial 𝑝-group. In particular,

dim k ( Hom ( G , k ) ) = dim k ( Hom ( R / Φ ( R ) , k ) ) ,

where R = G / O p ( G ) .

Once a group 𝐺 is defined in GAP, the command div below gives the set of prime divisors of | G | , π ( G ) . The functions following div then take as input either 𝐺, or 𝐺 and a prime p π ( G ) , and output the following lists respectively:

  1. the centralisers of a complete set of conjugacy class representatives of 𝐺,

  2. for each conjugacy class representative x G / , the groups

    C G ( x ) / O p ( C G ( x ) ) = R ,

  3. the elementary abelian 𝑝-groups R / Φ ( R ) ,

  4. the rank of R / Φ ( R ) .

The final function then produces a list of dimensions dim k ( HH 1 ( k G ) ) , with one entry for each p π ( G ) .

div:=PrimeDivisors(Size(G));

ListFpCentralisers:=function(X); > return List(ConjugacyClasses(X),i-> Image(IsomorphismFpGroup(Centralizer(X,Representative(i))))); > end;;

ListMaxPQuot:=function(X,p); > return List(ListFpCentralisers(X),i -> Image(EpimorphismPGroup(i,p))); > end;;

ListElAb:=function(X,p); > return List(ListMaxPQuot(X,p), i -> i/FrattiniSubgroup(i)); > end;;

ListPRank:=function(X,p); > return List(ListElAb(X,p), i -> RankPGroup(i)); > end;;

dimHH1:=function(X); > return List(div,i->Sum(ListPRank(X,i))); > end;

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to the referee for their helpful and constructive comments, in particular with regards to the structure of this paper. I would also like to thank Xin Huang for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper, and Markus Linckelmann for his support and for many interesting conversations.

  1. Communicated by: Olivier Dudas

References

[1] J. B. An and M. Conder, The Alperin and Dade conjectures for the simple Mathieu groups, Comm. Algebra 23 (1995), no. 8, 2797–2823. 10.1080/00927879508825370Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. Benson, R. Kessar and M. Linckelmann, On the BV structure of the Hochschild cohomology of finite group algebras, Pacific J. Math. 313 (2021), no. 1, 1–44. 10.2140/pjm.2021.313.1Search in Google Scholar

[3] D. J. Benson, Representations and Chomology. II: Cohomology of Groups and Modules, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 31, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. J. Benson and J. F. Carlson, Diagrammatic methods for modular representations and cohomology, Comm. Algebra 15 (1987), no. 1–2, 53–121. 10.1080/00927878708823414Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. Brauer, On the arithmetic in a group ring, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 30 (1944), 109–114. 10.1073/pnas.30.5.109Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] B. Briggs and L. Rubio y Degrassi, Stable invariance of the restricted Lie algebra structure of Hochschild cohomology, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13871. Search in Google Scholar

[7] K. S. Brown, Cohomology of Groups, Grad. Texts in Math. 87, Springer, New York, 1982. 10.1007/978-1-4684-9327-6Search in Google Scholar

[8] C. Chaparro, S. Schroll and A. Solotar, On the Lie algebra structure of the first Hochschild cohomology of gentle algebras and Brauer graph algebras, J. Algebra 558 (2020), 293–326. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2020.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. H. Conway, R. T. Curtis, S. P. Norton, R. A. Parker and R. A. Wilson, A T L A S of Finite Groups, Oxford University, Eynsham, 1985. Search in Google Scholar

[10] C. W. Curtis and I. Reiner, Methods of Representation Theory. Vol. I: With Applications to Finite Groups and Orders, Pure Appl. Math., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981. Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Dokchitser, https://people.maths.bris.ac.uk/~matyd/GroupNames/index.html. Search in Google Scholar

[12] F. Eisele and T. Raedschelders, On solvability of the first Hochschild cohomology of a finite-dimensional algebra, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020), no. 11, 7607–7638. 10.1090/tran/8064Search in Google Scholar

[13] K. Erdmann, Blocks of Tame Representation Type and Related Algebras, Lecture Notes in Math. 1428, Springer, Berlin, 1990. 10.1007/BFb0084003Search in Google Scholar

[14] N. Farrell and R. Kessar, Rationality of blocks of quasi-simple finite groups, Represent. Theory 23 (2019), 325–349. 10.1090/ert/530Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. Fleischmann, I. Janiszczak and W. Lempken, Finite groups have local non-Schur centralizers, Manuscripta Math. 80 (1993), no. 2, 213–224. 10.1007/BF03026547Search in Google Scholar

[16] G. Hochschild, On the cohomology groups of an associative algebra, Ann. of Math. (2) 46 (1945), 58–67. 10.2307/1969145Search in Google Scholar

[17] T. R. Hoffman, Constructing Basic Algebras for the Principal Block of Sporadic Simple Groups, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Arizona, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Holm, Derived equivalent tame blocks, J. Algebra 194 (1997), no. 1, 178–200. 10.1006/jabr.1996.7007Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. Holm, Hochschild cohomology of tame blocks, J. Algebra 271 (2004), no. 2, 798–826. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2003.09.030Search in Google Scholar

[20] G. D. James, The modular characters of the Mathieu groups, J. Algebra 27 (1973), 57–111. 10.1016/0021-8693(73)90165-8Search in Google Scholar

[21] C. Jansen, K. Lux, R. Parker and R. Wilson, AnAtlas of Brauer Characters, London Math. Soc. Monogr. (N. S.) 11, Oxford University, New York, 1995. Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Kalaycıoğlu, Computing the projective indecomposable modules of large finite groups, PhD thesis, The University of Arizona, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

[23] G. Karpilovsky, Group Representations. Vol. 2, North-Holland Math. Stud. 177, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993. Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. Kessar, A remark on Donovan’s conjecture, Arch. Math. (Basel) 82 (2004), no. 5, 391–394. 10.1007/s00013-004-4880-8Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. Knörr and G. R. Robinson, Some remarks on a conjecture of Alperin, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 39 (1989), no. 1, 48–60. 10.1112/jlms/s2-39.1.48Search in Google Scholar

[26] S. Koshitani, The Loewy structure of the projective indecomposable modules for SL ( 3 , 3 ) and its automorphism group in characteristic 3, Comm. Algebra 15 (1987), no. 6, 1215–1253. 10.1080/00927878708823466Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. Koshitani and K. Waki, The Loewy structure of the projective modules of the Mathieu group M 12 and its automorphism group in characteristic 3, Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), no. 1, 1–36. 10.1080/00927879908826419Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. Külshammer and G. R. Robinson, An alternating sum for Hochschild cohomology of a block, J. Algebra 249 (2002), no. 1, 220–225. 10.1006/jabr.2001.9066Search in Google Scholar

[29] W. Lempken and R. Staszewski, The structure of the projective indecomposable modules of 3 ^ M 22 in characteristic 2, Math. Comp. 62 (1994), no. 206, 841–850. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1994-1216260-9Search in Google Scholar

[30] M. Linckelmann, The Block Theory of Finite Group Algebras. Vol. I, London Math. Soc. Stud. Texts 91, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2018. 10.1017/9781108349307Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. Linckelmann, The Block Theory of Finite Group Algebras. Vol. II, London Math. Soc. Stud. Texts 92, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2018. 10.1017/9781108349307Search in Google Scholar

[32] M. Linckelmann and L. Rubio y Degrassi, Block algebras with H H 1 a simple Lie algebra, Q. J. Math. 69 (2018), no. 4, 1123–1128. Search in Google Scholar

[33] M. Linckelmann and L. Rubio y Degrassi, On the Lie algebra structure of H H 1 ( A ) of a finite-dimensional algebra ��, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 148 (2020), no. 5, 1879–1890. 10.1090/proc/14875Search in Google Scholar

[34] K. Lux and M. Wiegelmann, Determination of socle series using the condensation method, J. Symbolic Comput. 31 (2001), 163–178. 10.1006/jsco.1999.1009Search in Google Scholar

[35] T. Okuyama, Some examples of derived equivalent blocks of finite groups, unpublished 1999. Search in Google Scholar

[36] R. Rouquier, Block theory via stable and Rickard equivalences, Modular Representation Theory of Finite Groups (Charlottesville 1998), De Gruyter, Berlin (2001), 101–146. 10.1515/9783110889161.101Search in Google Scholar

[37] L. Rubio y Degrassi, S. Schroll and A. Solotar, The first Hochschild cohomology as a Lie algebra, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12145v3. 10.2989/16073606.2022.2115424Search in Google Scholar

[38] S. F. Siegel and S. J. Witherspoon, The Hochschild cohomology ring of a group algebra, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 79 (1999), no. 1, 131–157. 10.1112/S0024611599011958Search in Google Scholar

[39] S. F. Siegel and S. J. Witherspoon, The Hochschild cohomology ring of a cyclic block, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (2000), no. 5, 1263–1268. 10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05466-6Search in Google Scholar

[40] Y. Usami, Principal blocks with extra-special defect groups of order 27, Groups and Combinatorics—In Memory of Michio Suzuki, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 32 Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo (2001), 413–421. 10.2969/aspm/03210413Search in Google Scholar

[41] K. Waki, The Loewy structure of the projective indecomposable modules for the Mathieu groups in characteristic 3, Comm. Algebra 21 (1993), no. 5, 1457–1485. 10.1080/00927879308824631Search in Google Scholar

[42] C. A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 38, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1994. 10.1017/CBO9781139644136Search in Google Scholar

[43] R. Wilson, J. Thackray, R. Parker, F. Noeske, J. Müller, K. Lux, F. Lübeck, C. Jansen, G. Hiß and T. Breuer, The Modular Atlas, http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/LDFM/homes/MOC/. Search in Google Scholar

[44] S. J. Witherspoon, Products in Hochschild cohomology and Grothendieck rings of group crossed products, Adv. Math. 185 (2004), no. 1, 136–158. 10.1016/S0001-8708(03)00168-3Search in Google Scholar

[45] The GAP Group, GAP – Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, Version 4.11.1, https://www.gap-system.org, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-10-26
Revised: 2022-03-10
Published Online: 2022-07-22
Published in Print: 2023-01-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.10.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2021-0176/html
Scroll to top button