skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Quantifying and Mitigating Popularity Bias in Conversational Recommender Systems

Published: 17 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Conversational recommender systems (CRS) have shown great success in accurately capturing a user's current and detailed preference through the multi-round interaction cycle while effectively guiding users to a more personalized recommendation. Perhaps surprisingly, conversational recommender systems can be plagued by popularity bias, much like traditional recommender systems. In this paper, we systematically study the problem of popularity bias in CRSs. We demonstrate the existence of popularity bias in existing state-of-the-art CRSs from an exposure rate, a success rate, and a conversational utility perspective, and propose a suite of popularity bias metrics designed specifically for the CRS setting. We then introduce a debiasing framework with three unique features: (i) Popularity-Aware Focused Learning, to reduce the popularity-distorting impact on preference prediction; (ii) Cold-Start Item Embedding Reconstruction via Attribute Mapping, to improve the modeling of cold-start items; and (iii) Dual-Policy Learning, to better guide the CRS when dealing with either popular or unpopular items. Through extensive experiments on two frequently used CRS datasets, we find the proposed model-agnostic debiasing framework not only mitigates the popularity bias in state-of-the-art CRSs but also improves the overall recommendation performance.

References

[1]
Himan Abdollahpouri. 2019. Popularity bias in ranking and recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 529--530.
[2]
Himan Abdollahpouri and Robin Burke. 2019. Reducing Popularity Bias in Recommendation Over Time. CoRR, Vol. abs/1906.11711 (2019). [arXiv]1906.11711 http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.11711
[3]
Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2017. Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems. 42--46.
[4]
Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019a. Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking. In The thirty-second international flairs conference.
[5]
Himan Abdollahpouri, Masoud Mansoury, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019b. The unfairness of popularity bias in recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13286 (2019).
[6]
Himan Abdollahpouri, Masoud Mansoury, Robin Burke, Bamshad Mobasher, and Edward Malthouse. 2021. User-Centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems. In UMAP.
[7]
Alex Beutel, Ed H. Chi, Zhiyuan Cheng, Hubert Pham, and John Anderson. 2017. Beyond Globally Optimal: Focused Learning for Improved Recommendations. In TheWebConf.
[8]
Ludovico Boratto, Gianni Fenu, and Mirko Marras. 2021. Connecting user and item perspectives in popularity debiasing for collaborative recommendation. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 58, 1 (2021), 102387.
[9]
M. Craig Brown. 1994. Using Gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta data. Social science & medicine (1994).
[10]
Erik Brynjolfsson, Yu Jeffrey Hu, and Michael D Smith. 2006. From niches to riches: Anatomy of the long tail. Sloan management review, Vol. 47, 4 (2006), 67--71.
[11]
Zuohui Fu, Yikun Xian, Shijie Geng, Gerard de Melo, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2021a. Popcorn: Human-in-the-Loop Popularity Debiasing in Conversational Recommender Systems. In CIKM.
[12]
Zuohui Fu, Yikun Xian, Yaxin Zhu, Shuyuan Xu, Zelong Li, Gerard De Melo, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2021b. HOOPS: Human-in-the-Loop Graph Reasoning for Conversational Recommendation. In SIGIR.
[13]
Chongming Gao, Wenqiang Lei, Xiangnan He, M. de Rijke, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Advances and Challenges in Conversational Recommender Systems: A Survey. ArXiv, Vol. abs/2101.09459 (2021).
[14]
Mark P. Graus and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2015. Improving the User Experience during Cold Start through Choice-Based Preference Elicitation. In RecSys.
[15]
Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173--182.
[16]
Dietmar Jannach, Lukas Lerche, Iman Kamehkhosh, and Michael Jugovac. 2015. What Recommenders Recommend: An Analysis of Recommendation Biases and Possible Countermeasures. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2015).
[17]
Dietmar Jannach, Ahtsham Manzoor, Wanling Cai, and Li Chen. 2021. A survey on conversational recommender systems.
[18]
Hai Jiang, Xin Qi, and He Sun. 2014. Choice-based recommender systems: a unified approach to achieving relevancy and diversity. In Operations Research.
[19]
Toshihiro Kamishima, Shotaro Akaho, Hideki Asoh, and Jun Sakuma. 2014. Correcting Popularity Bias by Enhancing Recommendation Neutrality. In RecSys Posters.
[20]
Wenqiang Lei, Xiangnan He, Yisong Miao, Qingyun Wu, Richang Hong, Min-Yen Kan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020a. Estimation-action-reflection: Towards deep interaction between conversational and recommender systems. In WSDM.
[21]
Wenqiang Lei, Gangyi Zhang, Xiangnan He, Yisong Miao, Xiang Wang, Liang Chen, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020b. Interactive path reasoning on graph for conversational recommendation. In KDD.
[22]
Shijun Li, Wenqiang Lei, Qingyun Wu, Xiangnan He, Peng Jiang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Seamlessly unifying attributes and items: Conversational recommendation for cold-start users. In TOIS.
[23]
Zeming Liu, Haifeng Wang, Zheng-Yu Niu, Hua Wu, Wanxiang Che, and Ting Liu. 2020. Towards Conversational Recommendation over Multi-Type Dialogs. In ACL.
[24]
Yoon-Joo Park and Alexander Tuzhilin. 2008. The long tail of recommender systems and how to leverage it. In RecSys.
[25]
Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2012. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2618 (2012).
[26]
Guy Shani and Asela Gunawardana. 2011. Evaluating Recommendation Systems. Recommender Systems Handbook.
[27]
Harald Steck. 2011. Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. 125--132.
[28]
Yueming Sun and Yi Zhang. 2018. Conversational recommender system. In SIGIR.
[29]
Jianling Wang, Ya Le, Bo Chang, Yuyan Wang, Ed H Chi, and Minmin Chen. 2022. Learning to Augment for Casual User Recommendation. In TheWebConf.
[30]
Tianxin Wei, Fuli Feng, Jiawei Chen, Ziwei Wu, Jinfeng Yi, and Xiangnan He. 2021. Model-agnostic counterfactual reasoning for eliminating popularity bias in recommender system. In KDD.
[31]
Ronald J Williams. 1992. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine learning, Vol. 8, 3 (1992), 229--256.
[32]
Kerui Xu, Jingxuan Yang, Jun Xu, Sheng Gao, Jun Guo, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2021a. Adapting User Preference to Online Feedback in Multi-Round Conversational Recommendation.
[33]
Kerui Xu, Jingxuan Yang, Jun Xu, Sheng Gao, Jun Guo, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2021b. Adapting user preference to online feedback in multi-round conversational recommendation. In WSDM.
[34]
Xiaoying Zhang, Hong Xie, Hang Li, and John C.S. Lui. 2020. Conversational Contextual Bandit: Algorithm and Application.
[35]
Yongfeng Zhang, Xu Chen, Qingyao Ai, Liu Yang, and W. Bruce Croft. 2018. Towards Conversational Search and Recommendation: System Ask, User Respond. In CIKM.
[36]
Kun Zhou, Wayne Xin Zhao, Shuqing Bian, Yuanhang Zhou, Ji-Rong Wen, and Jingsong Yu. 2020. Improving Conversational Recommender Systems via Knowledge Graph Based Semantic Fusion. In KDD.
[37]
Ziwei Zhu, Yun He, Xing Zhao, and James Caverlee. 2021a. Popularity Bias in Dynamic Recommendation. In KDD.
[38]
Ziwei Zhu, Yun He, Xing Zhao, Yin Zhang, Jianling Wang, and James Caverlee. 2021b. Popularity-Opportunity Bias in Collaborative Filtering. In WSDM.
[39]
Jie Zou, Yifan Chen, and Evangelos Kanoulas. 2020. Towards Question-Based Recommender Systems. In SIGIR.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)FairCRS: Towards User-oriented Fairness in Conversational Recommendation SystemsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688150(126-136)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)NoteLLM: A Retrievable Large Language Model for Note RecommendationCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3648314(170-179)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)Cluster Anchor Regularization to Alleviate Popularity Bias in Recommender SystemsCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3648312(151-160)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Quantifying and Mitigating Popularity Bias in Conversational Recommender Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '22: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
    October 2022
    5274 pages
    ISBN:9781450392365
    DOI:10.1145/3511808
    • General Chairs:
    • Mohammad Al Hasan,
    • Li Xiong
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. conversational recommender system
    2. debiasing
    3. popularity bias

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • NSF

    Conference

    CIKM '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 621 of 2,257 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)388
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)FairCRS: Towards User-oriented Fairness in Conversational Recommendation SystemsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688150(126-136)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
    • (2024)NoteLLM: A Retrievable Large Language Model for Note RecommendationCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3648314(170-179)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Cluster Anchor Regularization to Alleviate Popularity Bias in Recommender SystemsCompanion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589335.3648312(151-160)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Debiasing Recommendation with Personal PopularityProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202410.1145/3589334.3645421(3400-3409)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)Maximum Entropy Policy for Long-Term Fairness in Interactive Recommender SystemsIEEE Transactions on Services Computing10.1109/TSC.2024.334963617:3(1029-1043)Online publication date: May-2024
    • (2024)A survey on popularity bias in recommender systemsUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10.1007/s11257-024-09406-0Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Enhancing Calibration and Reducing Popularity Bias in Recommender SystemsEnterprise Information Systems10.1007/978-3-031-64755-0_1(3-24)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Bias Assessment Approaches for Addressing User-Centered Fairness in GNN-Based Recommender SystemsInformation10.3390/info1402013114:2(131)Online publication date: 17-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Sparks of Artificial General Recommender (AGR): Experiments with ChatGPTAlgorithms10.3390/a1609043216:9(432)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2023
    • (2023)A review on individual and multistakeholder fairness in tourism recommender systemsFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2023.11686926Online publication date: 10-May-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media