skip to main content
research-article
Open access

ParseMVS: Learning Primitive-aware Surface Representations for Sparse Multi-view Stereopsis

Published: 10 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Multi-view stereopsis (MVS) recovers 3D surfaces by finding dense photo-consistent correspondences from densely sampled images. In this paper, we tackle the challenging MVS task from sparsely sampled views (up to an order of magnitude fewer images), which is more practical and cost-efficient in applications. The major challenge comes from the significant correspondence ambiguity introduced by the severe occlusions and the highly skewed patches. On the other hand, such ambiguity can be resolved by incorporating geometric cues from the global structure. In light of this, we propose ParseMVS, boosting sparse MVS by learning the P rimitive-A waR e S urface rE presentation. In particular, on top of being aware of global structure, our novel representation further allows for the preservation of fine details including geometry, texture, and visibility. More specifically, the whole scene is parsed into multiple geometric primitives. On each of them, the geometry is defined as the displacement along the primitives' normal directions, together with the texture and visibility along each view direction. An unsupervised neural network is trained to learn these factors by progressively increasing the photo-consistency and render-consistency among all input images. Since the surface properties are changed locally in the 2D space of each primitive, ParseMVS can preserve global primitive structures while optimizing local details, handling the 'incompleteness' and the 'inaccuracy' problems. We experimentally demonstrate that ParseMVS constantly outperforms the state-of-the-art surface reconstruction method in both completeness and the overall score under varying sampling sparsity, especially under the extreme sparse-MVS settings. Beyond that, ParseMVS also shows great potential in compression, robustness, and efficiency.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (MM22-fp0726.mp4)
Presentation video. The video shows our effort to tackle the sparse MVS task, ParseMVS, which contains a primitive-based neural surface representation and an unsupervised learning pipeline for sparse MVS task, which enables achieving both complete and accurate reconstruction under the setting of sparse observation. Experiments on large-scale dataset prove the effectiveness of our method.

References

[1]
Henrik Aanæs, Rasmus Ramsbøl Jensen, George Vogiatzis, Engin Tola, and Anders Bjorholm Dahl. 2016. Large-Scale Data for Multiple-View Stereopsis. International Journal of Computer Vision (2016), 1--16.
[2]
Neill DF Campbell, George Vogiatzis, Carlos Hernández, and Roberto Cipolla. 2008. Using multiple hypotheses to improve depth-maps for multi-view stereo. In European Conference on Computer Vision. 766--779.
[3]
Rohan Chabra, Jan Eric Lenssen, Eddy Ilg, Tanner Schmidt, Julian Straub, Steven Lovegrove, and Richard Newcombe. 2020. Deep Local Shapes: Learning Local SDF Priors for Detailed 3D Reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.10983 (2020).
[4]
Rui Chen, Songfang Han, Jing Xu, et al. 2020. Visibility-Aware Point-Based Multi-View Stereo Network. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2020).
[5]
Rui Chen, Songfang Han, Jing Xu, and Hao Su. 2019. Point-Based Multi-View Stereo Network. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[6]
Shuo Cheng, Zexiang Xu, Shilin Zhu, Zhuwen Li, Li Erran Li, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Hao Su. 2020. Deep stereo using adaptive thin volume representation with uncertainty awareness. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2524--2534.
[7]
Brian Curless and Marc Levoy. 1996. A volumetric method for building complex models from range images. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 303--312.
[8]
Yasutaka Furukawa, Brian Curless, Steven M Seitz, and Richard Szeliski. 2009. Manhattan-world stereo. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1422--1429.
[9]
Yasutaka Furukawa and Jean Ponce. 2010. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 32, 8 (2010), 1362--1376.
[10]
Silvano Galliani, Katrin Lasinger, and Konrad Schindler. 2015. Massively parallel multiview stereopsis by surface normal diffusion. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 873--881.
[11]
S. Galliani and K. Schindler. 2016. Just Look at the Image: Viewpoint-Specific Surface Normal Prediction for Improved Multi-View Reconstruction. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5479--5487.
[12]
David Gallup, Jan-Michael Frahm, and Marc Pollefeys. 2010. Piecewise planar and non-planar stereo for urban scene reconstruction. In 2010 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, 1418--1425.
[13]
Kyle Genova, Forrester Cole, Avneesh Sud, Aaron Sarna, and Thomas Funkhouser. 2020. Local Deep Implicit Functions for 3D Shape. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4857--4866.
[14]
Michael Goesele, Noah Snavely, Brian Curless, Hugues Hoppe, and Steven Seitz. 2007. Multi-View Stereo for Community Photo Collections. 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408933
[15]
Thibault Groueix, Matthew Fisher, Vladimir G Kim, Bryan C Russell, and Mathieu Aubry. 2018. A papier-mâché approach to learning 3d surface generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 216--224.
[16]
Xiaodong Gu, Zhiwen Fan, Siyu Zhu, Zuozhuo Dai, Feitong Tan, and Ping Tan. 2019. Cascade Cost Volume for High-Resolution Multi-View Stereo and Stereo Matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06378 (2019).
[17]
Xufeng Han, Thomas Leung, Yangqing Jia, Rahul Sukthankar, and Alexander. C. Berg. 2015. MatchNet: Unifying Feature and Metric Learning for Patch-Based Matching. In CVPR.
[18]
Zhizhong Han, Chao Chen, Yu-Shen Liu, and Matthias Zwicker. 2020. ShapeCaptioner: Generative caption network for 3D shapes by learning a mapping from parts detected in multiple views to sentences. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1018--1027.
[19]
Qian He, Desen Zhou, Bo Wan, and Xuming He. 2021. Single Image 3D Object Estimation with Primitive Graph Networks. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2353--2361.
[20]
Paul Henderson and Vittorio Ferrari. 2019. Learning single-image 3D reconstruction by generative modelling of shape, pose and shading. International Journal of Computer Vision (2019), 1--20.
[21]
Jingwei Huang, Yanfeng Zhang, and Mingwei Sun. 2021. PrimitiveNet: Primitive Instance Segmentation with Local Primitive Embedding under Adversarial Metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 15343--15353.
[22]
Michal Jancosek and Tomas Pajdla. 2011a. Multi-View Reconstruction Preserving Weakly-Supported Surfaces. 3121 -- 3128. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995693
[23]
Michal Jancosek and Tomás Pajdla. 2011b. Multi-view reconstruction preserving weakly-supported surfaces. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3121--3128.
[24]
Mengqi Ji, Juergen Gall, Haitian Zheng, Yebin Liu, and Lu Fang. 2017. Surfacenet: An end-to-end 3d neural network for multiview stereopsis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2307--2315.
[25]
Mengqi Ji, Jinzhi Zhang, Qionghai Dai, and Lu Fang. 2020. SurfaceNet: An End-to-end 3D Neural Network for Very Sparse Multi-view Stereopsis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2020).
[26]
Chiyu Jiang, Avneesh Sud, Ameesh Makadia, Jingwei Huang, Matthias Nießner, and Thomas Funkhouser. 2020. Local implicit grid representations for 3d scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 6001--6010.
[27]
Angjoo Kanazawa, Michael J Black, David W Jacobs, and Jitendra Malik. 2018a. End-to-end recovery of human shape and pose. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 7122--7131.
[28]
Angjoo Kanazawa, Shubham Tulsiani, Alexei A Efros, and Jitendra Malik. 2018b. Learning category-specific mesh reconstruction from image collections. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 371--386.
[29]
Abhishek Kar, Christian H"ane, and Jitendra Malik. 2017. Learning a multi-view stereo machine. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 30 (2017).
[30]
Hiroharu Kato, Yoshitaka Ushiku, and Tatsuya Harada. 2018. Neural 3d mesh renderer. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3907--3916.
[31]
Alex Kendall, Hayk Martirosyan, Saumitro Dasgupta, Peter Henry, Ryan Kennedy, Abraham Bachrach, and Adam Bry. 2017. End-to-End Learning of Geometry and Context for Deep Stereo Regression. CoRR, Vol. abs/1703.04309 (2017).
[32]
Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
[33]
Arno Knapitsch, Jaesik Park, Qian-Yi Zhou, and Vladlen Koltun. 2017a. Tanks and Temples: Benchmarking Large-Scale Scene Reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 36, 4 (2017).
[34]
Arno Knapitsch, Jaesik Park, Qian-Yi Zhou, and Vladlen Koltun. 2017b. Tanks and temples: Benchmarking large-scale scene reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), Vol. 36, 4 (2017), 1--13.
[35]
Patrick Knöbelreiter, Christian Reinbacher, Alexander Shekhovtsov, and Thomas Pock. 2017. End-to-End Training of Hybrid CNN-CRF Models for Stereo. In 2017 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[36]
K. N. Kutulakos and S. M. Seitz. 1999. A theory of shape by space carving. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 1. 307--314.
[37]
Lubor Ladicky, Olivier Saurer, SoHyeon Jeong, Fabio Maninchedda, and Marc Pollefeys. 2017. From point clouds to mesh using regression. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 3893--3902.
[38]
Victor Lempitsky and Yuri Boykov. 2007. Global optimization for shape fitting. In 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 1--8.
[39]
M. Lhuillier and L. Quan. 2005. A quasi-dense approach to surface reconstruction from uncalibrated images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 27, 3 (March 2005), 418--433. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2005.44
[40]
Lingxiao Li, Minhyuk Sung, Anastasia Dubrovina, Li Yi, and Leonidas J Guibas. 2019. Supervised fitting of geometric primitives to 3d point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2652--2660.
[41]
Yangyan Li, Xiaokun Wu, Yiorgos Chrysathou, Andrei Sharf, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Niloy J Mitra. 2011. Globfit: Consistently fitting primitives by discovering global relations. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 papers. 1--12.
[42]
Chen-Hsuan Lin, Oliver Wang, Bryan C Russell, Eli Shechtman, Vladimir G Kim, Matthew Fisher, and Simon Lucey. 2019. Photometric Mesh Optimization for Video-Aligned 3D Object Reconstruction. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[43]
Chen Liu, Kihwan Kim, Jinwei Gu, Yasutaka Furukawa, and Jan Kautz. 2019a. Planercnn: 3d plane detection and reconstruction from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4450--4459.
[44]
Lingjie Liu, Jiatao Gu, Kyaw Zaw Lin, Tat-Seng Chua, and Christian Theobalt. 2020. Neural sparse voxel fields. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020).
[45]
Shichen Liu, Tianye Li, Weikai Chen, and Hao Li. 2019b. Soft rasterizer: A differentiable renderer for image-based 3d reasoning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 7708--7717.
[46]
David Marshall, Gabor Lukacs, and Ralph Martin. 2001. Robust segmentation of primitives from range data in the presence of geometric degeneracy. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, Vol. 23, 3 (2001), 304--314.
[47]
Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Noha Radwan, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Jonathan T Barron, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Daniel Duckworth. 2020. NeRF in the Wild: Neural Radiance Fields for Unconstrained Photo Collections. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02268 (2020).
[48]
Paul Merrell, Amir Akbarzadeh, Liang Wang, Philippos Mordohai, Jan-Michael Frahm, Ruigang Yang, David Nisté r, and Marc Pollefeys. 2007. Real-Time Visibility-Based Fusion of Depth Maps. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 1--8.
[49]
Lars Mescheder, Michael Oechsle, Michael Niemeyer, Sebastian Nowozin, and Andreas Geiger. 2019. Occupancy networks: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4460--4470.
[50]
Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. 2020. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.08934 (2020).
[51]
Peer Neubert and Peter Protzel. 2014. Compact watershed and preemptive slic: On improving trade-offs of superpixel segmentation algorithms. In 2014 22nd international conference on pattern recognition. IEEE, 996--1001.
[52]
Michael Niemeyer, Lars Mescheder, Michael Oechsle, and Andreas Geiger. 2020. Differentiable volumetric rendering: Learning implicit 3d representations without 3d supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3504--3515.
[53]
Michael Oechsle, Lars Mescheder, Michael Niemeyer, Thilo Strauss, and Andreas Geiger. 2019. Texture fields: Learning texture representations in function space. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 4531--4540.
[54]
Sven Oesau, Florent Lafarge, and Pierre Alliez. 2016. Planar shape detection and regularization in tandem. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 35. Wiley Online Library, 203--215.
[55]
Jeong Joon Park, Peter Florence, Julian Straub, Richard Newcombe, and Steven Lovegrove. 2019. Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 165--174.
[56]
Tahir Rabbani, Frank Van Den Heuvel, and George Vosselmann. 2006. Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint. International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Vol. 36, 5 (2006), 248--253.
[57]
Gernot Riegler, Ali Osman Ulusoy, Horst Bischof, and Andreas Geiger. 2017. Octnetfusion: Learning depth fusion from data. In 2017 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV). IEEE, 57--66.
[58]
Ruwen Schnabel, Roland Wahl, and Reinhard Klein. 2007. Efficient RANSAC for point-cloud shape detection. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 26. Wiley Online Library, 214--226.
[59]
Johannes Lutz Schönberger, Enliang Zheng, Marc Pollefeys, and Jan-Michael Frahm. 2016. Pixelwise View Selection for Unstructured Multi-View Stereo. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV).
[60]
Thomas Schops, Johannes L Schonberger, Silvano Galliani, Torsten Sattler, Konrad Schindler, Marc Pollefeys, and Andreas Geiger. 2017. A multi-view stereo benchmark with high-resolution images and multi-camera videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 3260--3269.
[61]
Akihito Seki and Marc Pollefeys. 2017. SGM-Nets: Semi-Global Matching With Neural Networks. In CVPR.
[62]
Ayan Sinha, Asim Unmesh, Qixing Huang, and Karthik Ramani. 2017. Surfnet: Generating 3d shape surfaces using deep residual networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 6040--6049.
[63]
Sudipta Sinha, Drew Steedly, and Rick Szeliski. 2009. Piecewise planar stereo for image-based rendering. In 2009 International Conference on Computer Vision. 1881--1888.
[64]
Vincent Sitzmann, Michael Zollhöfer, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2019. Scene representation networks: Continuous 3d-structure-aware neural scene representations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1121--1132.
[65]
Engin Tola, Christoph Strecha, and Pascal Fua. 2012. Efficient large-scale multi-view stereo for ultra high-resolution image sets. Machine Vision and Applications (2012), 1--18.
[66]
Fangjinhua Wang, Silvano Galliani, Christoph Vogel, Pablo Speciale, and Marc Pollefeys. 2021. Patchmatchnet: Learned multi-view patchmatch stereo. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 14194--14203.
[67]
Meng Wang, Lingjing Wang, and Yi Fang. 2017. 3densinet: A robust neural network architecture towards 3d volumetric object prediction from 2d image. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 961--969.
[68]
Nanyang Wang, Yinda Zhang, Zhuwen Li, Yanwei Fu, Wei Liu, and Yu-Gang Jiang. 2018. Pixel2mesh: Generating 3d mesh models from single rgb images. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 52--67.
[69]
Peng Xiang, Xin Wen, Yu-Shen Liu, Yan-Pei Cao, Pengfei Wan, Wen Zheng, and Zhizhong Han. 2021. Snowflakenet: Point cloud completion by snowflake point deconvolution with skip-transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. 5499--5509.
[70]
Qingshan Xu and Wenbing Tao. 2020. Planar Prior Assisted PatchMatch Multi-View Stereo. In AAAI.
[71]
Qiangeng Xu, Zexiang Xu, Julien Philip, Sai Bi, Zhixin Shu, Kalyan Sunkavalli, and Ulrich Neumann. 2022. Point-NeRF: Point-based Neural Radiance Fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08845 (2022).
[72]
Yao Yao, Zixin Luo, Shiwei Li, Tian Fang, and Long Quan. 2018. MVSnet: Depth inference for unstructured multi-view stereo. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 767--783.
[73]
Yao Yao, Zixin Luo, Shiwei Li, Tianwei Shen, Tian Fang, and Long Quan. 2019. Recurrent mvsnet for high-resolution multi-view stereo depth inference. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 5525--5534.
[74]
Lior Yariv, Yoni Kasten, Dror Moran, Meirav Galun, Matan Atzmon, Basri Ronen, and Yaron Lipman. 2020. Multiview Neural Surface Reconstruction by Disentangling Geometry and Appearance. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020).
[75]
Hongwei Yi, Zizhuang Wei, Mingyu Ding, Runze Zhang, Yisong Chen, Guoping Wang, and Yu-Wing Tai. 2019. Pyramid Multi-view Stereo Net with Self-adaptive View Aggregation. arxiv preprint arXiv:1912.03001 (2019).
[76]
Fenggen Yu, Zhiqin Chen, Manyi Li, Aditya Sanghi, Hooman Shayani, Ali Mahdavi-Amiri, and Hao Zhang. 2021. CAPRI-Net: Learning Compact CAD Shapes with Adaptive Primitive Assembly. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.05652 (2021).
[77]
Christopher Zach. 2008. Fast and High Quality Fusion of Depth Maps. (01 2008).
[78]
Jinzhi Zhang, Mengqi Ji, Guangyu Wang, Xue Zhiwei, Shengjin Wang, and Lu Fang. 2021b. SurRF: Unsupervised Multi-view Stereopsis by Learning Surface Radiance Field. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2021).
[79]
Jianing Zhang, Jinzhi Zhang, Shi Mao, Mengqi Ji, Guangyu Wang, Zequn Chen, Tian Zhang, Xiaoyun Yuan, Qionghai Dai, and Lu Fang. 2021c. GigaMVS: A Benchmark for Ultra-large-scale Gigapixel-level 3D Reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence 01 (2021), 1--1.
[80]
Xuancheng Zhang, Yutong Feng, Siqi Li, Changqing Zou, Hai Wan, Xibin Zhao, Yandong Guo, and Yue Gao. 2021a. View-guided point cloud completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 15890--15899.
[81]
Fan Zhu, Li Liu, Jin Xie, Fumin Shen, Ling Shao, and Yi Fang. 2018. Learning to synthesize 3d indoor scenes from monocular images. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 501--509.io

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Addressing Low-Shot MVS by Detecting and Completing Planar Surfaces2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)10.1109/3DV62453.2024.00015(549-558)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Toward Large-Scale Plenoptic ReconstructionPlenoptic Imaging and Processing10.1007/978-981-97-6915-5_5(191-325)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2024
  • (2023)PARF: Primitive-Aware Radiance Fusion for Indoor Scene Novel View Synthesis2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.01623(17660-17670)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023

Index Terms

  1. ParseMVS: Learning Primitive-aware Surface Representations for Sparse Multi-view Stereopsis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MM '22: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
    October 2022
    7537 pages
    ISBN:9781450392037
    DOI:10.1145/3503161
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. multi-view stereopsis
    2. primitive
    3. sparse views

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Shanghai Biren Technology Co., Ltd.
    • Ministry of Science and Technology of China
    • Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
    • Shenzhen Key Laboratory of next generation interactive media innovative technology

    Conference

    MM '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 995 of 4,171 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    MM '24
    The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
    October 28 - November 1, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)267
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)65
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Addressing Low-Shot MVS by Detecting and Completing Planar Surfaces2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)10.1109/3DV62453.2024.00015(549-558)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Toward Large-Scale Plenoptic ReconstructionPlenoptic Imaging and Processing10.1007/978-981-97-6915-5_5(191-325)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2024
    • (2023)PARF: Primitive-Aware Radiance Fusion for Indoor Scene Novel View Synthesis2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.01623(17660-17670)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2023

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media